Jump to content

Dating a Parker 51 Flighter


Paul-in-SF

Recommended Posts

I have just received a Parker 51 Flighter, stainless steel body and cap of course, gold-plated clip ring, clip and cap band. The barrel inscription says "MADE IN U.S.A. 9" very clearly with a strong imprint, it is not possible that it once said "59" for example.  

 

At Parker Penography, it says this: "Also in 1950 the Parker "51" Flighter was introduced. This pen was made of steel with GF trim and survided (sic) until 1960. In the late 1950's the gold cap ring was deleted from the Flighter pen." It also says this immediately prior to the above: "From 1950 the single "year" digit on the body became 2 digits. "MADE IN U.S.A. 50"" This information is repeated on the page about dating Parker pens in general. 

 

In addition, the aerometric filling instructions say to squeeze 6 times, and the filler sleeve is made of chromed steel rather than brushed steel. The arrow clip measures 42 mm long, and stops about 18 mm above the bottom of the clip. I don't know if that makes it one of the transitional clips or not (there is no blue diamond). The barrel threads (where the section screws into the barrel) appear to be raised above the level of the inside of the barrel. Based on Parker Penography, these things all point to the Mark II-A version, which was made in 1948-49; all those items changed with the Mark IIB version in 1950. 

 

So there seem to be some contradictions here. Could the pen have been made, say, in late 1949 even though it wasn't sold until the next year? That would account for the single digit year code, and the other features. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 9
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Paul-in-SF

    4

  • gyasko

    2

  • mitto

    2

  • joss

    1

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

2 hours ago, Paul-in-SF said:

Could the pen have been made, say, in late 1949 even though it wasn't sold until the next year? That would account for the single digit year code, and the other features. 

 

It had to be made before it could be sold, so a 1949 date code seems well within the realm of possibility.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, gyasko said:

 

It had to be made before it could be sold, so a 1949 date code seems well within the realm of possibility.

 

Logically, yes. I guess that would make this a very early Flighter. I wonder if there are any sales figures anywhere for USA-made Flighters for that first year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The first advertisements for the Parker 51 Flighter appeared in November and December 1949 in local newspapers such as the Janesville Daily Gazette, Billings Gazette, San Francisco Examiner and Philadelphia Inquirer. The ads specifically mention that the 51 Flighter was available as a set (FP + pencil). From these ads one can assume that the 51 Flighter was for sale from at least November 1949. This agrees with the observation that 51 Flighters with date code 3d quarter 1949 exist: see the last replies in this FPN thread.

 

It is a bit odd that the first full page colour advertisement mentioning or (correction, see below) showing the 51 Flighter appeared as late as October 1950 (Saturday Evening Post, October 7, 1950). That is probably where the confusion on the introduction date of the 51 Flighter stems from. But the introduction year is definitely 1949.

 

Addition:

I just checked my Parker advertisements and found that the list of available Parker 51 models includes "All-metal custom sets in Lustraloy, $29.75" in ads from December 3, 1949 onwards. This is the 51 Flighter set.

Edited by joss
text added
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, that makes sense then. Thanks for the other, more precise, sources of information (which is what I was hoping to get by posting this). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 1949 51 Flighter would be a Mark I Type 1.  It has a 40 mm gold filled arrow clip, a rolled gold trim band on the cap, a press 6 times Aerometric filler, a single digit date code, and the barrel threads are extended.

The 1950 51 Flighter would be a Mark I Type 2. It has a 36 mm gold filled arrow clip, a gold filled band on the cap, a press 4 times Aerometric filler, a two digit date code, and the barrel threads that are indented.

And since Parker was not always clean about transitions there are 1950 pens & pencils with the longer 1949 clips out there.  I have a 1949 in my collection and have sold two of them in the past.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43844
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      33558
    3. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    4. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      26730
    5. jar
      jar
      26101
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • Shanghai Knife Dude
      I have the Sailor Naginata and some fancy blade nibs coming after 2022 by a number of new workshop from China.  With all my respect, IMHO, they are all (bleep) in doing chinese characters.  Go use a bush, or at least a bush pen. 
    • A Smug Dill
      It is the reason why I'm so keen on the idea of a personal library — of pens, nibs, inks, paper products, etc. — and spent so much money, as well as time and effort, to “build” it for myself (because I can't simply remember everything, especially as I'm getting older fast) and my wife, so that we can “know”; and, instead of just disposing of what displeased us, or even just not good enough to be “given the time of day” against competition from >500 other pens and >500 other inks for our at
    • adamselene
      Agreed.  And I think it’s good to be aware of this early on and think about at the point of buying rather than rationalizing a purchase..
    • A Smug Dill
      Alas, one cannot know “good” without some idea of “bad” against which to contrast; and, as one of my former bosses (back when I was in my twenties) used to say, “on the scale of good to bad…”, it's a spectrum, not a dichotomy. Whereas subjectively acceptable (or tolerable) and unacceptable may well be a dichotomy to someone, and finding whether the threshold or cusp between them lies takes experiencing many degrees of less-than-ideal, especially if the decision is somehow influenced by factors o
    • adamselene
      I got my first real fountain pen on my 60th birthday and many hundreds of pens later I’ve often thought of what I should’ve known in the beginning. I have many pens, the majority of which have some objectionable feature. If they are too delicate, or can’t be posted, or they are too precious to face losing , still they are users, but only in very limited environments..  I have a big disliking for pens that have the cap jump into the air and fly off. I object to Pens that dry out, or leave blobs o
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...