Jump to content

"A man of letters"?


Eoghan2009

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 28
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • ParramattaPaul

    4

  • TSherbs

    3

  • LizEF

    3

  • Karmachanic

    3

8 hours ago, Eoghan2009 said:

What do you understand this phrase to mean?

Just so I don't completely ruin your thread...  I've always understood this to mean someone with a university-level education in the arts / humanities.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LizEF said:

Just so I don't completely ruin your thread...  I've always understood this to mean someone with a university-level education in the arts / humanities.

 

Seconded.  Hence Doctor of Letters being a sometime terminal degree in the humanities.

bayesianprior.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, BayesianPrior said:

 

Seconded.  Hence Doctor of Letters being a sometime terminal degree in the humanities.

There is that, and strictly speaking one would say it is true.  Yet, there are those who would suggest the term includes those who are well versed in the humanities; including the self-educated and those who have a tertiary education in humanities but no formal academic qualification; i.e., BA Hum., etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, ParramattaPaul said:

There is that, and strictly speaking one would say it is true.  Yet, there are those who would suggest the term includes those who are well versed in the humanities; including the self-educated and those who have a tertiary education in humanities but no formal academic qualification; i.e., BA Hum., etc.

I would agree.  The playwright August Wilson, a Pittsburgh native and Pulitzer Prize winner, was largely self-taught.  He skipped school on a regular basis, apparently -- instead of formal education, he'd spend days in the library reading.

Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth

"It's very nice, but frankly, when I signed that list for a P-51, what I had in mind was a fountain pen."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Karmachanic said:

And writers.

This thread is just a wealth of inspiration! :D

large.AManofLetters2.jpg.e1a3c7c9de180f7fef104a4be69382bd.jpg

 

large.AManofLetters3.jpg.4b803e71e44e09f9ad8a2a6d0584fc43.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, inkstainedruth said:

instead of formal education, he'd spend days in the library reading.

Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth

On first reading, I missed the period, and wondered what of yours he was reading for so long. 

 

Anyway, I have always thought a man (or woman) of letters was mostly a scholarly person who writes and publishes a lot of scholarly works, whether amateur or professional. I would not necessarily think of a classical composer as a person of letters, for example, nor an accomplished painter or sculptor. It has always resonated to me as a person who uses written language in an educated and sophisticated way. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And then there's Joe Bloggs BA, MBA, MSc, PhD, MD, MPH, LLB, DFC

Add lightness and simplicate.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A few years ago I stumbled upon an explanation of the term (in some sort of connection to Stephen Fry). Roughly, and leaving room for an imperfect memory, the explanation was that the term originated in the 18th century, and was used to describe intellectuals - often of a rebellious sort - who wrote letters that were then printed and circulated in the pamphlets that were a kind of newspapers of the day. The use of the term in modern times, then, refers to persons who participate in the public discourse by writing books or articles about matters of e.g. social and cultural importance. 

 

In my mind it also carries a connotation of a person whose command of the written language is superb, and has a certain elegance and perhaps an artistic flair. It is not, to be sure, applicable to the writers of tabloid journalism or boring textbooks on politics and government. 

 

 - P. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Many moons ago, when most people had no formal education, a “man of letters” would describe a person who could read and write. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Arcadian's explanation comes really close to the Spanish meaning, but we take it back a century or two. A man who was a skilled writers and a good soldier was the best courtesan for the old Spanish empire. Nowadays things are way less formal, did it become a new trend in people looking for smart and fit men? It sort of checks out.

Always looking for new ways to downsize my collection.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I take it to mean "A man who has a love for letters" whether they be alphabetical letters or mailed/mailing letters. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, TSherbs said:

This dude never came back to the thread.

Perhaps all he wanted was rhe replies and not a conversation. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43844
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      33494
    3. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    4. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      26624
    5. jar
      jar
      26101
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • Shanghai Knife Dude
      I have the Sailor Naginata and some fancy blade nibs coming after 2022 by a number of new workshop from China.  With all my respect, IMHO, they are all (bleep) in doing chinese characters.  Go use a bush, or at least a bush pen. 
    • A Smug Dill
      It is the reason why I'm so keen on the idea of a personal library — of pens, nibs, inks, paper products, etc. — and spent so much money, as well as time and effort, to “build” it for myself (because I can't simply remember everything, especially as I'm getting older fast) and my wife, so that we can “know”; and, instead of just disposing of what displeased us, or even just not good enough to be “given the time of day” against competition from >500 other pens and >500 other inks for our at
    • adamselene
      Agreed.  And I think it’s good to be aware of this early on and think about at the point of buying rather than rationalizing a purchase..
    • A Smug Dill
      Alas, one cannot know “good” without some idea of “bad” against which to contrast; and, as one of my former bosses (back when I was in my twenties) used to say, “on the scale of good to bad…”, it's a spectrum, not a dichotomy. Whereas subjectively acceptable (or tolerable) and unacceptable may well be a dichotomy to someone, and finding whether the threshold or cusp between them lies takes experiencing many degrees of less-than-ideal, especially if the decision is somehow influenced by factors o
    • adamselene
      I got my first real fountain pen on my 60th birthday and many hundreds of pens later I’ve often thought of what I should’ve known in the beginning. I have many pens, the majority of which have some objectionable feature. If they are too delicate, or can’t be posted, or they are too precious to face losing , still they are users, but only in very limited environments..  I have a big disliking for pens that have the cap jump into the air and fly off. I object to Pens that dry out, or leave blobs o
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...