Jump to content

Wearever (I think) information request. Unusual clip.


kestrel

Recommended Posts

I am looking for information on the pen in the photo below.  The barrel/nib/feed is Wearever with a Kahn nib.  The celluloid on the cap matches the barrel and I have seen the design on the cap band on Wearever pens.  Obviously the clip is a custom build.  Has anyone else seen anything like this?  Is the black cap on the end of the barrel found on any other Wearever/Pioneer models?  The only markings on the pen are the initials on the clip and "14K Pat'd USA" on the nib.  Any help would be appreciated.

 

1396048306_P4170069copy.thumb.JPG.4d7cab20602519a2d54df62b1af7c5a1.JPG

Dave Campbell
Retired Science Teacher and Active Pen Addict
Every day is a chance to reduce my level of ignorance.

fpn_1425200643__fpn_1425160066__super_pi

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 6
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • kestrel

    4

  • Zookie

    1

  • Bristol24

    1

  • Colin Salter

    1

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

The initials on the clip are the original owners. The makers are probably under those.

With a magnifying glass, you might find the wearever  imprint on the barrel. They can be awfully hard to see sometimes.

I've never seen that nib before, but Wear ever was made by David Kahn in New Jersey. 

Good luck in your search 😎

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is no imprint of any kind on the barrel.  The two piece nib appeared on several pen models made by Mr. Kahn but none of the ones I have seen in the hand or in photos have a cap anything like this one.  As I said above, I am almost certain that the barrel/section/nib are a Wearever and the celluloid in cap and barrel are perfect matches so I don't think cap/barrel are from different pens.

 

It has to be a custom pen but I am trying to find out if anyone on the forum knows anything more about it or its possible provenance.

Dave Campbell
Retired Science Teacher and Active Pen Addict
Every day is a chance to reduce my level of ignorance.

fpn_1425200643__fpn_1425160066__super_pi

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I have numerous Wearever pens and combos and agree with you that the components are Wearever.  The problem is that Wearever/David Kahn had so many marketing channels that it is virtually impossible to even begin to sort it out.  They could have supplied components or even unbranded completed pens to various pen makers and/or retailers.  Truly, "anything for a buck" could easily have been the company motto.  Do keep us posted should you find anything.  I'm trying to find a Wearever catalog from the 40's...so far to no avail.

“The only thing most people do better than anyone else is read their own handwriting.”  John Adams

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you, Bristol24.  For a company that made so many pens I am having a difficult time getting information on the company.  My best guess is it came from a stationer or department store where the customer could select the letters to go on the modified clip when the pen was purchased.

Dave Campbell
Retired Science Teacher and Active Pen Addict
Every day is a chance to reduce my level of ignorance.

fpn_1425200643__fpn_1425160066__super_pi

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

I have several identical Wearever pens, but without the personalisation and without that nib. Goodness knows what the model is - it's quite unlike any other Wearevers, with those heavy black jewels (the Pacemaker has one only, covering the fill button). I also have a mechanical pencil with the same personalisation initials on it, which was sold to me as a Wearever - but there are no identifying marks except for the general style.

The lack of definitive information about the various Wearever models is driving me mad!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Colin Salter said:

I have several identical Wearever pens, but without the personalisation and without that nib. Goodness knows what the model is - it's quite unlike any other Wearevers, with those heavy black jewels (the Pacemaker has one only, covering the fill button). I also have a mechanical pencil with the same personalisation initials on it, which was sold to me as a Wearever - but there are no identifying marks except for the general style.

The lack of definitive information about the various Wearever models is driving me mad!

Thanks for the input.  A few weeks ago I found a very similar pen without the initials on the clip but with a slightly mangled A.A. Waterman nib.  I agree that trying to identify the various Wearever models and sub brands and jobber lots is an exercise in frustration.  Fortunately, it can't drive me mad because I am already there.

Dave Campbell
Retired Science Teacher and Active Pen Addict
Every day is a chance to reduce my level of ignorance.

fpn_1425200643__fpn_1425160066__super_pi

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43844
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      33558
    3. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    4. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      26730
    5. jar
      jar
      26101
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • Shanghai Knife Dude
      I have the Sailor Naginata and some fancy blade nibs coming after 2022 by a number of new workshop from China.  With all my respect, IMHO, they are all (bleep) in doing chinese characters.  Go use a bush, or at least a bush pen. 
    • A Smug Dill
      It is the reason why I'm so keen on the idea of a personal library — of pens, nibs, inks, paper products, etc. — and spent so much money, as well as time and effort, to “build” it for myself (because I can't simply remember everything, especially as I'm getting older fast) and my wife, so that we can “know”; and, instead of just disposing of what displeased us, or even just not good enough to be “given the time of day” against competition from >500 other pens and >500 other inks for our at
    • adamselene
      Agreed.  And I think it’s good to be aware of this early on and think about at the point of buying rather than rationalizing a purchase..
    • A Smug Dill
      Alas, one cannot know “good” without some idea of “bad” against which to contrast; and, as one of my former bosses (back when I was in my twenties) used to say, “on the scale of good to bad…”, it's a spectrum, not a dichotomy. Whereas subjectively acceptable (or tolerable) and unacceptable may well be a dichotomy to someone, and finding whether the threshold or cusp between them lies takes experiencing many degrees of less-than-ideal, especially if the decision is somehow influenced by factors o
    • adamselene
      I got my first real fountain pen on my 60th birthday and many hundreds of pens later I’ve often thought of what I should’ve known in the beginning. I have many pens, the majority of which have some objectionable feature. If they are too delicate, or can’t be posted, or they are too precious to face losing , still they are users, but only in very limited environments..  I have a big disliking for pens that have the cap jump into the air and fly off. I object to Pens that dry out, or leave blobs o
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...