Jump to content

LAMY cp1 time table


christof

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone! Just made an account to respond to this thread :) I started hunting CP1s down a while ago, their shape and clip type are very nice! I'll attach a picture of the ones I already have in case someone's interested; still looking for the white one and the metal with a black strip.

 

On my brushed finish model, the cap and body of the pen have noticeably different textures; I'm wondering if perhaps they stem from different pens. I'm not sure if you can tell the difference in textures in the photo. The body might even be from a LAMY st, which have a very similar shape - I have one and the cap is totally interchangeable with all of my CPs.

 

Thank you for compiling the table with dates! Tried making one myself a while ago, but it was far less complete than yours :P From what I've heard, the white one comes in two slightly different variations: the black "LAMY" text on the cap appears on different sides of the clip. Not sure if this is important enough to be added to the table though, I think they're still the same model.

cp1s.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • christof

    11

  • lucraak

    9

  • bonnie-scott

    8

  • Pen Engineer

    4

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Recently I found this pen on the Bay, it was advertised as a LAMY pre-CP1, model 19. With exception of clip, it seems to be identical to a second generation CP1 (9,5 mm diameter). Nib is unmarked. Body and cap made from glossy Alu etched with a nice chevron type design. Any information about what it is?

P1140272.JPG

P1140277.JPG

P1140278.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, jungkind said:

Recently I found this pen on the Bay, it was advertised as a LAMY pre-CP1, model 19. With exception of clip, it seems to be identical to a second generation CP1 (9,5 mm diameter). Nib is unmarked. Body and cap made from glossy Alu etched with a nice chevron type design. Any information about what it is?

It's not a version of the CP1.  It is called the Lamy Linea (Model 49) with a herringbone (fish bone) pattern.  The same pen can be had with stripes (there is another thread discussing the model with stripes at the moment) or checks (square pattern).  It is very similar to the St, at least I think the feed sections are a direct swap.  This pattern/model also came in Black.

 

According to the information that I have the original version of the CP1 came out in 1974, the later revised version of the CP1 (fatter) came out in 1983.  The Lamy St came out in 1979 and the Linea came out in 1986.  So the Lines was the later of the three models to be produced.

 

Regards,

Julian

Edited by bonnie-scott
fix auto correct - bah!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks, that makes sense. If the Linea came out in 1986, that was after the CP1 was revised and explains the the similarity to the CP1.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, bonnie-scott said:

I

 

According to the information that I have the original version of the CP1 came out in 1974, the later revised version of the CP1 (fatter) came out in 1983.  The Lamy St came out in 1979 and the Linea came out in 1986.  So the Lines was the later of the three models to be produced.

 

Regards,

Julian

 

Only the ballpoint pen and the mechanical pencil of the cp1 series came out in 1974. The fountain pen came later in 1977.

C.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, christof said:

Only the ballpoint pen and the mechanical pencil of the cp1 series came out in 1974. The fountain pen came later in 1977

Hi Christof,

 

thanks for clarifying that.  My mistake I was just working off a chart of dates for various Lamy Models and forgot that for the CP1 the fountain pen came out later.

 

Cheers,

Julian

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Nice post !

I've got the brushed steel and the sterling silver models but don't know if it is 70's o 80's.

A very nice pen.

LYTH

http://i1226.photobucket.com/albums/ee402/LYTH1/031.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/10/2022 at 1:13 PM, LYTH said:

I've got the brushed steel and the sterling silver models but don't know if it is 70's o 80's.

According to Christop's table on the first page, if you have a sterling silver one that is pre update in 1983 - so the thinner one.  If the brushed steel has the same diameter (can you swap caps) then that is also pre-1983.

 

best wises 

Julian

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am trying to complete Christof's list with a bit more information. 

I am wondering something. I don't seem to be able to remove the feed from the older model CP1's. Did somebody manage to remove the feed from their older models?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/11/2022 at 5:54 PM, bonnie-scott said:

According to Christop's table on the first page, if you have a sterling silver one that is pre update in 1983 - so the thinner one.  If the brushed steel has the same diameter (can you swap caps) then that is also pre-1983.

 

best wises 

Julian

Great thanks, Julian.

 

So I could guess now they are pre-1983.

 

Kind regards, Lionel

LYTH

http://i1226.photobucket.com/albums/ee402/LYTH1/031.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, lucraak said:

I am trying to complete Christof's list with a bit more information. 

I am wondering something. I don't seem to be able to remove the feed from the older model CP1's. Did somebody manage to remove the feed from their older models?

 

Yes, I did:

 

51009964232_9afabccbc4_3k.jpgLAMY cp1 section feed nib by C.M.Z, auf Flickr

 

i would be very interested in hearing your informations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, lucraak said:

Mine didnt work really well :(

 

D361FFB4-50AA-4991-B3C4-502438E0A025.jpeg

Darn!!!!  I have to admit I'm not brave enough to take pens apart in this way.  I have had some feeds come out the changing pens, but otherwise I leave well alone and enjoy the pictures from people who are braver than me to understand how these things work 🙂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, bonnie-scott said:

Darn!!!!  I have to admit I'm not brave enough to take pens apart in this way.  I have had some feeds come out the changing pens, but otherwise I leave well alone and enjoy the pictures from people who are braver than me to understand how these things work 🙂


Haha i shall not rest before i am able to fully dissasemble an old cp1. No clue what i did wrong here but i’ll definately give it another try with another pen some day ;) (maybe invest in some crypto first before doing so.. ) but firstly i’ll try to remove the feed of this broken pen (i cannot break it any further so violence is an option now ;))

 

i’ll share my progress here ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/5/2021 at 9:54 PM, bonnie-scott said:

The White version was made in the earlier/slimmer version.  In the attached picture the bottom three pens are of the earlier/slimmer type and the top two are the later/fatter type although it is difficult to see.

 

Regards,

Julian 667633743_CP1first.thumb.jpg.bab7d3dfc5632c07f31d1c0f38e0e57a.jpg

 

If you are ever thinking about selling the thin white one... please let me know :) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lamy CP1 Timetable

21 January 2022

As a follow up of the topic of Christof1 I tried to find out a bit more about the CP1 timetable. I do not claim to be entirely accurate but this is what I found and maybe we jointly can fill in the blanks. 

In addition to Christof’s post I used several sources to come up with this summary: 2,3,4

Model coding

All CP1 models share the number 5 in the model coding. It is prefixed or suffixed based on the pen type and finish respectively. Only the fountain pen does not have a prefix and therefore only has a 2 digit model coding where the others have a 3 digit code.

5X: Fountain pen
15X: Mechanical pencil
25X: Ballpoint
35X: Rollerball
45X: Multi color ballpoint
55X: Fineliner
65X: Twin pen ("Mehrsystemschreiber", ballpoint and mechanical pencil?) 6 is also used for tri-pen??

The X in the list above represents a finish for the pen. 

Color coding

0: Brushed Steel
1: White gold plated (???)
2: Silver plated
3: Silver (Sterling Silver 925, later replaced by Platinum finish)
4: Chrome plated (???)
5: Metallic (present in 1988 catalog)
6: Matte Black (post 1983 replacement of color 8)
7: White and black
8: Matte Black
9: Brushed Steel (post 1983 replacement of color 0)

?: Hematite / Gun metal / Glossy grey black

All CP1 models

Disclaimer: I only mention introductions, when a pen was already in production, they are not mentioned. I have no information about when a pen was discontinued.

YEAR NUMBER TYPE SURFACE NIB LENGTH (MM) THICKNESS (MM)
1974 250+150 Ballpoint and mechanical pencil (0.7) Brushed Steel n.a. ? ?
1974 251+151 Ballpoint and mechanical pencil only White gold plated n.a. ? ?
1975 255T+255A+255J Ballpoint Tigereye, Amethyst, Jade (without clip) n.a. ? ?
1975 251+151 Ballpoint and mechanical pencil (0.7) Silver plated n.a. ? ?
1976 258+158 Ballpoint and mechanical pencil (0.5) Matte Black n.a. ? ?
1976 253+153 Ballpoint and mechanical pencil Silver sterling silver 925) n.a. ? ?
1977 5,6 50 Fountain pen Brushed Steel 14c (platinum plated) 133,91 8,56
1977 150 Mechanical pencil (0.5) Brushed Steel n.a. ? ?
1978 58 Fountain pen Matte Black Steel 134,25 8,62
1978 558 Fineliner Matte Black n.a. ? ?
1978 550 Fineliner Brushed Steel n.a. ? ?
1978 53 Fountain pen Sterling Silver 14c (platinum plated) TODO TODO
19797 59 Fountain pen (clip with longitudinal black stripe) Matte steel Steel 133,93 8,59
1979 259 Ballpoint Matte steel n.a. ? ?
19798 252+152 Ballpoint and mechanical pencil Silver plated 20 edged facetted design n.a. ? ?
1979 458 Multi pen Matte Black n.a. ? ?
1979 450 Multi pen Brushed Steel n.a. ? ?
1981 251+151 Ballpoint and mechanical pencil only Silver plated n.a. ? ?
1981 350+358 Rollerball Brushed Steel + Matte Black n.a. ? ?
1982 57 Fountain pen White and Black Steel (black) ? ?
1982 257 Ballpoint White and Black n.a. ? ?
1983 157 Mechanical pencil (0.5) White and Black n.a. ? ?
1984 357+557 Rollerball + Fineliner White and Black n.a. ? ?
1984 359+559 Rollerball + Fineliner Brushed Steel n.a. ? ?
1984 356+556 Rollerball + Fineliner Matte Black n.a. ? ?

This is where my biggest information source stops. I know there are Mercedes Benz editions of the pens and there might also be other versions of (some of the models of the pens)

Fountain Pens only

YEAR NUMBER TYPE SURFACE NIB LENGTH (MM) THICKNESS (MM)
1977 5,6 50 Fountain pen Brushed Steel 14c (platinum plated) 133,91 8,56
1978 6 58 Fountain pen Matte Black Steel 134,25 8,62
1978 53 Fountain pen Sterling Silver 14c (platinum plated) 133,79 8,64
19797 59 Fountain pen (clip with longitudinal black stripe) Matte steel Steel 133,93 8,59
1982 57 Fountain pen White and Black Steel (black) ? ?
19839 57 Fountain pen White and Black Steel (black) 134,41 9,49
1983 59 (was 50) Fountain pen Brushed Steel Steel 133,94 9,42
1983 56 (was 58) Fountain pen Matte Black Steel 134,55 9,44
198810, 11 55 Fountain pen Metallic Steel 134,52 9,45
? 54 Fountain pen Chrome Plated / Polished? Steel 134,31 9,45
? ? Fountain pen Gunmetal / Hematite (grey black). Glossy Steel (black) 134,33 9,43
2013 53 Fountain pen 12 Platinum plated 14c (bi-colour plated) 134,28 9,52

1983 Model revisions

Around 1983 the model was redesigned. It got a tiny bit longer (about half a millimeter) but quite a bit thicker (about 1 millimeter). Nib and feed were adopted from the 1980 Safari model. The nib got a breather hole (yet, no markings on the nib as we do see nowadays). 

Another small change after 1983 - the feed (and nib?)

Not sure when but after a while the feed again was changed, maybe around a similar time the nibs got their markings (LAMY (585 14k) and Nib size). This did not result in a noticeable external change (measurements). Probably only the internal structure of the section was needed for this change. Why they changed it is not clear to me, I think it probably changed for all models at a certain time, maybe the new feed performed better. Any help on the time when this change happened and why this happened is very welcome.


  1. https://www.fountainpennetwork.com/forum/topic/358837-lamy-cp1-time-table/ ↩︎

  2. https://www.fountainpennetwork.com/forum/topic/155782-lamy-cp50-vs-cp1-black/ ↩︎

  3. https://www.flickr.com/photos/lamy_fp/27999602665/in/album-72157670433720525/ ↩︎

  4. Lamy Schreibgerätearchiv 1932-1989 (internal? scanned written document with all versions of all Lamy pens). Received from a respected Ebay seller.  ↩︎

  5. Lamy explicitly mentions the introduction of the new ink cartridge T10 ↩︎

  6. Some of these have LAMY W.GERMANY etched into the cap or barrel, some don’t. I don’t have a clue as to which year’s models have this.  ↩︎

  7. Unreadable note in Lamy internal document ↩︎

  8. Found in 1979 catalog. 20 edged facetted design, not mentioned in Lamy internal document.  ↩︎

  9. Model revision. ↩︎

  10. Introduction of different feed? (as current models used in most Lamy pens) ↩︎

  11. Metallic color is present in 1988 catalog. The fountain pen is not depicted on one of the pages of the catalog, but the other pens (ballpoint and twin pen) are. The table with pens denotes that there is a fountain pen (models introduced: 55,255,655). Metallic is described as: “Grau-metallic, siebenfach beschichted. Schlank und zylindrisch. Massiver, abgefehderter, hochglanzpolierter Edelstahlclip”. The metallic twin pen was still in a 1997 catalog ↩︎

  12. Replacement for Sterling Silver model, keeps same reference number  ↩︎

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, lucraak said:

Only the fountain pen does not have a prefix and therefore only has a 2 digit model coding where the others have a 3 digit code.

Great work, will have a look and see if I can add any more detail.

 

As a point of interest I believe the initial code on the three digit code is consistent across the Lamy ranges so anything that starts with 2XX is a ballpoint, anything that starts 3XX is a rollerball and so on.

 

Cheers,

Julian

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, bonnie-scott said:

As a point of interest I believe the initial code on the three digit code is consistent across the Lamy ranges so anything that starts with 2XX is a ballpoint, anything that starts 3XX is a rollerball and so on.

 

Cheers,

Julian

Yes indeed it is. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have questions for the Lamy slim fountain pen specialists.

 

Three weeks ago I bought a cp1 (black version); although I tend to prefer the chucky, bulkier fountain pens, the cp1 charmed me and has been used daily ever since.


Today, by chance, I came across this fountain pen in a second-hand shop:

 

043858DA-3E9D-4414-BB00-41FFA126D9B0.thumb.jpeg.8e140648d5bd7a2f9467e4f1293b1c06.jpeg
If I understand you correctly, it's not a cp1, but a Lamy Linea. Funnily enough, the grip section is exactly the same, even the sprue points for the injection moulding are in the same place, the caps are interchangeable and can also be posted to the other pen and the dimensions are completely the same. The hole for pressure compensation when opening and closing (under the clip) is also in exactly the same position.
Only the clip is different, even very different.

 

Was this pen launched before the cp1 or did both models exist in parallel? Does anyone know in which period the model with the squares was manufactured?
The Lamy lettering on the clip is quite worn, but otherwise the pen has no signs of wear.

 

Does anyone know if the aluminium box I bought it in today is contemporary to the pen or could have had nothing to do with it?
Questions about questions.... Thank you very much if anyone can give me any information!

 

Oh, one more thing unrelated to Lamy: I bought this blotter in the same shop, in black stone and brass, for a whole €4 (tax included). I'm at least as happy about it!

B195DE28-E29C-41E3-B58B-A84B540CE131.thumb.jpeg.1348e1b12ff76823d0f2b756c2c99678.jpeg

You will be forgiven that you cannot, but never more that you do not want to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43844
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      33583
    3. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    4. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      26772
    5. jar
      jar
      26105
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • Shanghai Knife Dude
      I have the Sailor Naginata and some fancy blade nibs coming after 2022 by a number of new workshop from China.  With all my respect, IMHO, they are all (bleep) in doing chinese characters.  Go use a bush, or at least a bush pen. 
    • A Smug Dill
      It is the reason why I'm so keen on the idea of a personal library — of pens, nibs, inks, paper products, etc. — and spent so much money, as well as time and effort, to “build” it for myself (because I can't simply remember everything, especially as I'm getting older fast) and my wife, so that we can “know”; and, instead of just disposing of what displeased us, or even just not good enough to be “given the time of day” against competition from >500 other pens and >500 other inks for our at
    • adamselene
      Agreed.  And I think it’s good to be aware of this early on and think about at the point of buying rather than rationalizing a purchase..
    • A Smug Dill
      Alas, one cannot know “good” without some idea of “bad” against which to contrast; and, as one of my former bosses (back when I was in my twenties) used to say, “on the scale of good to bad…”, it's a spectrum, not a dichotomy. Whereas subjectively acceptable (or tolerable) and unacceptable may well be a dichotomy to someone, and finding whether the threshold or cusp between them lies takes experiencing many degrees of less-than-ideal, especially if the decision is somehow influenced by factors o
    • adamselene
      I got my first real fountain pen on my 60th birthday and many hundreds of pens later I’ve often thought of what I should’ve known in the beginning. I have many pens, the majority of which have some objectionable feature. If they are too delicate, or can’t be posted, or they are too precious to face losing , still they are users, but only in very limited environments..  I have a big disliking for pens that have the cap jump into the air and fly off. I object to Pens that dry out, or leave blobs o
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...