Jump to content

Montblanc Royal Blue - one of the best washable blues around?


bunnspecial

Recommended Posts

I've used most of the big brands of washable blue on the market, and when I say use I mean I keep plenty of them onhand and even have a couple half-empty bottles of Waterman around. I'm not a cartridge user, but they have their place(and I have one pen that is cartridge only) and have piles of Pelikan blue cartridges not to mention bottles. When Waterman was on sale for $5 a bottle last month on Amazon, I couldn't resist stocking up on a few spares.

 

I bought a bottle Montblanc Royal Blue a while back, but hadn't really paid much attention to it. This past week, I had a new to me MB 142 arrive, and I thought that ink might be a good match for it.

 

II was rewarded with a lovely, rich and very wet writing blue line. Waterman and Pelikan have always felt rather washed out to me, and Pelikan is of course dry as a bone. Comparing in a few other pens as a "known reference" the Montblanc seems wetter than Waterman, an ink I've always considered on the wet side.

 

I have to say that this may now be one of my favorite go-to inks. The only real downside to it is the cost-it's ~$25 for a 60mL bottle as opposed to ~$10 for 50mL of Waterman or about the same for 62.5mL of Pelikan(not counting buying 1L bottles of Pelikan).

 

Has anyone else had a similar experience to me with this ink? Alternatively, is there another, perhaps more economical, washable blue with similar properties?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • bunnspecial

    2

  • Karmachanic

    2

  • TitoThePencilPimp

    1

  • arcfide

    1

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Given that you like/enjoy the ink, it may be more beneficial to think in terms of cost per annum. How long will that 60ml bottle last you?

Add lightness and simplicate.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good point on that.


With that said, Pelikan and Waterman have become my defacto "pen testing" inks, which is why I tend to use a fair bit of Waterman in particular. They are economical to use for that, but assuming everything is good I'm happy to keep using them until the pen is empty(or I get tired of using it and decide to dump and clean it).

 

Maybe the MB needs to be saved for actual use, for lack of a better term.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I prefer Pelikan Royal Blue. You can always add something to it, ie, photoflow, to make it more wet writing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hrm, interesting. I agree that MB Royal Blue is a good candidate. I wonder, I really like the swabs of Sailor Blue, but haven't had a chance to try it out for any long period of time. Maybe that's another "rich" candidate that is still washable? 

 

There's also some great Diamine inks in that color range. Pilot's Blue is probably too washed out for you as well, and Lamy's blue is a total classic that I get the impression has the same "emotive reputation" in some places in Germany as Parker Quink Washable Blue evokes for some people in the U.S. and other countries, that is, the "school boy" blue. 

 

I also wouldn't rule out the offerings from Monteverde either. 

 

To me though, I think you can go "too far" with a nice blue into the realm of just a rich, non-water resistant blue, such that it no longer fits the "washable blue" category for me. At least the term "washable blue" for me denotes that classic blue fountain pen ink that is intentionally *not* too rich, but well flowing without excessive features, and completely "inoffensive" in nearly every way. It's supposed to be the sort of ink that caters to ease and "parental sanity" above character and dynamic qualities. In that sense, I almost think MB Royal Blue might be "too good". 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I agree with you , bunnspecial.  Compared to Waterman, for example, MB RB is a bit richer, perhaps more saturated, but very well behaved, and it is a striking color. I consider it a bit more purple, perhaps more royal, than Waterman. But it is very well behaved, and I didn't have any issues with it on even mediocre paper. Considering I primarily bought it for the unique bottle I wanted to try, I was impressed. It is one I will use regularly, for sure.

Adam

Dayton, OH

It is the glory of God to conceal a matter; to search out a matter is the glory of kings.

-- Prov 25:2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Without question MB inks are reliable and quality inks, with their Royal Blue a nice example. 
 

However, my favorite is Parker Penman Sapphire blue of which I have a very large supply.  I love the Greek seller of cartridges many years ago that I bought several thousand from, because they have been partially dehydrated in the plastic, their use yields an indescribable rich, well performing , beautifully red sheening blue ink.
 

I have not found another blue like it, including several recipes. It also uses phenol as a preservative, so this holds up long term if you can find it. 

With the new FPN rules, now I REALLY don't know what to put in my signature.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43844
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      33583
    3. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    4. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      26772
    5. jar
      jar
      26105
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • Shanghai Knife Dude
      I have the Sailor Naginata and some fancy blade nibs coming after 2022 by a number of new workshop from China.  With all my respect, IMHO, they are all (bleep) in doing chinese characters.  Go use a bush, or at least a bush pen. 
    • A Smug Dill
      It is the reason why I'm so keen on the idea of a personal library — of pens, nibs, inks, paper products, etc. — and spent so much money, as well as time and effort, to “build” it for myself (because I can't simply remember everything, especially as I'm getting older fast) and my wife, so that we can “know”; and, instead of just disposing of what displeased us, or even just not good enough to be “given the time of day” against competition from >500 other pens and >500 other inks for our at
    • adamselene
      Agreed.  And I think it’s good to be aware of this early on and think about at the point of buying rather than rationalizing a purchase..
    • A Smug Dill
      Alas, one cannot know “good” without some idea of “bad” against which to contrast; and, as one of my former bosses (back when I was in my twenties) used to say, “on the scale of good to bad…”, it's a spectrum, not a dichotomy. Whereas subjectively acceptable (or tolerable) and unacceptable may well be a dichotomy to someone, and finding whether the threshold or cusp between them lies takes experiencing many degrees of less-than-ideal, especially if the decision is somehow influenced by factors o
    • adamselene
      I got my first real fountain pen on my 60th birthday and many hundreds of pens later I’ve often thought of what I should’ve known in the beginning. I have many pens, the majority of which have some objectionable feature. If they are too delicate, or can’t be posted, or they are too precious to face losing , still they are users, but only in very limited environments..  I have a big disliking for pens that have the cap jump into the air and fly off. I object to Pens that dry out, or leave blobs o
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...