Jump to content

An Unspectacular Video With A Spectacular Lens


EdgarK

Recommended Posts

While FPN was offline, I used the time to learn a bit more about ultrafast lenses, photography in general and filming :)

 

In photography, an ultrafast lens would typically have an f-stop at or below f/1.0. For the beginners: The lower the number, the more light can get into the lens. While this causes a shallow depth of field which can be very problematic (i.e. macro-photography), it can be very important for filming or just for aesthetic reasons. Stanley Kubricks film Barry Lyndon was basically only filmed in candle light (even if they modified the candles to have a brighter light) which lead to the requirement of an ultrafast lens. They used the Zeiss Planar f/0.7/50mm.

 

I was so fascinated of the look, that I finally bought an old Carl Zeiss Jena f/0.77/50 mm. It is very likely that this lens was produced at around 1966 and was originally used for X-ray machines:

 

(Click on the image for the video)

zeiss_f0_77_02.jpg

 

 

Since this lens simply was not made for cameras and there are no adapters available, it was not easy to use it on an ordinary camera. However, with the MFT system used in my Lumix G7 and a lot of dabbling I had success, since MFT has a relatively short flange distance:

 

zeiss_f0_77_holder.jpg

 

I tried to make photos; but, to be honest: Nooooo, they are not so good I think. Not for that amount of effort. The only photo I like is this one, shot with a Nikon APS-C sensor (a bit larger than MFT). It is an unedited file:

 

zeiss_f0_77_photo.jpg

 

I realized that this lens is way better for filming and so I decided to make a video. It was way harder than I expected and it is my first (and probably the last, I am more a photographer) video at all, but I think it is very interesting:

 

Video

(Click on the image for the video)

zeiss_f0_77_video.jpg

Restorations ▪ Guides ▪ Photos

https://www.pensink.org

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 3
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • EdgarK

    3

  • Schaumburg_Swan

    1

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 2 weeks later...

 Hi,

 

very interesting experiment with such an exotic lens! 🙂

Do you know for what negative size and scale was it designed?

I'm asking because the macro photo of the nib shows less spherical aberrations than the close-up of the swan bottle.

Or does that just look that way with it's very little dof?

 

Best and thank you for presenting

Jens

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Jens,

 

thanks for your feedback!

 

Unfortunately information is very rar. According to my information it is likely that they have been used for the Röntgenfernsehkameras (X-ray television cameras) by VEB Studiotechnik Berlin. After some research I found out that on products by VEB Studiotechnik Berlin they used the RFT logo (see according Wikipedia article). And I suspect that this lens (0.77/50) was used on a (RFT) RFK-4010, while the RFK must refer to the German word "Röntgenfernsehkamera" (X-ray television camera).

 

However, I still cannot find much information, also ZEISS doesn't know much about it any more.

 

Anyhow, in the German Wikipedia article of VEB is a photo of such an X-ray device:

 

Author: Michael Fuchs (1980) | License: Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported (CC BY-SA 3.0)

 

1237px-STTRFA.JPG

 

Restorations ▪ Guides ▪ Photos

https://www.pensink.org

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43844
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      33577
    3. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    4. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      26766
    5. jar
      jar
      26105
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • Shanghai Knife Dude
      I have the Sailor Naginata and some fancy blade nibs coming after 2022 by a number of new workshop from China.  With all my respect, IMHO, they are all (bleep) in doing chinese characters.  Go use a bush, or at least a bush pen. 
    • A Smug Dill
      It is the reason why I'm so keen on the idea of a personal library — of pens, nibs, inks, paper products, etc. — and spent so much money, as well as time and effort, to “build” it for myself (because I can't simply remember everything, especially as I'm getting older fast) and my wife, so that we can “know”; and, instead of just disposing of what displeased us, or even just not good enough to be “given the time of day” against competition from >500 other pens and >500 other inks for our at
    • adamselene
      Agreed.  And I think it’s good to be aware of this early on and think about at the point of buying rather than rationalizing a purchase..
    • A Smug Dill
      Alas, one cannot know “good” without some idea of “bad” against which to contrast; and, as one of my former bosses (back when I was in my twenties) used to say, “on the scale of good to bad…”, it's a spectrum, not a dichotomy. Whereas subjectively acceptable (or tolerable) and unacceptable may well be a dichotomy to someone, and finding whether the threshold or cusp between them lies takes experiencing many degrees of less-than-ideal, especially if the decision is somehow influenced by factors o
    • adamselene
      I got my first real fountain pen on my 60th birthday and many hundreds of pens later I’ve often thought of what I should’ve known in the beginning. I have many pens, the majority of which have some objectionable feature. If they are too delicate, or can’t be posted, or they are too precious to face losing , still they are users, but only in very limited environments..  I have a big disliking for pens that have the cap jump into the air and fly off. I object to Pens that dry out, or leave blobs o
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...