Jump to content

Converting Paper Weight In Pounds To Gsm


Paul-in-SF

Recommended Posts

The idiotic (because let's be honest, there's no other word for it) insistence on using equally idiotic units for measuring things in the US is very telling of this culture's willingness to embrace change. I used to think that having landed on the moon despite this was irrefutable proof of God's existence, but then I learned that all the calculations where done in SI units (after all, NASA's program owed much to the nazis' R & D in this area.

 

It is only in the realm of illegal drugs that people here are familiar with the Kilogram, so don't expect to be understood when asking for 100 grams of ham. The one time I had the crazy idea of asking for 0.3 POUNDS of something at the deli, it took three people to get it right).

 

Anyway, paper...

 

We measure paper in pounds, but pounds of what? For regular paper (y'know, the one we buy in reams of 500 sheets), that would be the weight of 500 22" x 17" sheets of paper. Why 22" x 17"? Because that's the size those sheets come in before they're cut (i.e. one such sheet produces 4 letter-sized sheets when cut twice or 2 11" x 17" sheets). I'm sure there's some history behind this, going back to the colonial period, but who knows. You can learn more than you ever wanted to by visiting wikipedia's entry on the subject: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paper_size#Standardized_American_paper_sizes

 

To make things more confusing, which is something we have extraordinary talent for, that base size - 22" x 17" - does NOT apply to all kinds of paper. Some kinds of paper use other "basis sizes." See https://pariscorp.com/paper-weight-guide/

 

Europeans, who are far more rational than we are, and this probably originated in Germany, whose people have a knack for norms (and also because I can't imagine, for example, people who run away from loose bulls on the streets would be interested in any of this), came up with an equally rational approach: let's weigh a SINGLE 1-square meter sheet.

 

The short of it is that to convert paper poundage (couldn't come up with another term) to gsm, you must multiply pounds by 3.76. Conversely, to make the inverse calculation, you must divide by 3.76.

 

The math:

 

22" x 17" = 0.2413 square meters.

0.2413 m2 x 500 sheets = 120.65 m2

1 Lb = 454 grams

 

454 g / 120.65 m2 = 3.76 g/m2 or gsm.

 

Alex

---------------------------------------------------------

We use our phones more than our pens.....

and the world is a worse place for it. - markh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 22
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • A Smug Dill

    4

  • Kenlowe

    3

  • Anne-Sophie

    2

  • XYZZY

    2

Very Interesting analysis

 

Due to my bad memory, the rule  I  have  been using for a while is that  the 24-lb  paper and the 90-gsm paper are about the same weight, at least  extremely close.

 

This can  help anyone  derive the scale factor back and forth, in case   they are like me and can not keep a number like 3.76  in their head for long.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43844
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      33583
    3. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    4. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      26772
    5. jar
      jar
      26105
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • Shanghai Knife Dude
      I have the Sailor Naginata and some fancy blade nibs coming after 2022 by a number of new workshop from China.  With all my respect, IMHO, they are all (bleep) in doing chinese characters.  Go use a bush, or at least a bush pen. 
    • A Smug Dill
      It is the reason why I'm so keen on the idea of a personal library — of pens, nibs, inks, paper products, etc. — and spent so much money, as well as time and effort, to “build” it for myself (because I can't simply remember everything, especially as I'm getting older fast) and my wife, so that we can “know”; and, instead of just disposing of what displeased us, or even just not good enough to be “given the time of day” against competition from >500 other pens and >500 other inks for our at
    • adamselene
      Agreed.  And I think it’s good to be aware of this early on and think about at the point of buying rather than rationalizing a purchase..
    • A Smug Dill
      Alas, one cannot know “good” without some idea of “bad” against which to contrast; and, as one of my former bosses (back when I was in my twenties) used to say, “on the scale of good to bad…”, it's a spectrum, not a dichotomy. Whereas subjectively acceptable (or tolerable) and unacceptable may well be a dichotomy to someone, and finding whether the threshold or cusp between them lies takes experiencing many degrees of less-than-ideal, especially if the decision is somehow influenced by factors o
    • adamselene
      I got my first real fountain pen on my 60th birthday and many hundreds of pens later I’ve often thought of what I should’ve known in the beginning. I have many pens, the majority of which have some objectionable feature. If they are too delicate, or can’t be posted, or they are too precious to face losing , still they are users, but only in very limited environments..  I have a big disliking for pens that have the cap jump into the air and fly off. I object to Pens that dry out, or leave blobs o
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...