Jump to content

Sheaffer Patents And What Might Have Been (Capillary Filling And Capless Retractable)


IThinkIHaveAProblem

Recommended Posts

I've recently fallen down the rabbit hole of Sheaffer pens. The Triumph style nibs (Early lifetime ones and later style) just draw me in.

I'm also a nerd. As such, I like knowing how things work. A great way to understand how things work is to look up the patents filed by the inventors.
While looking for the patents for Touchdown and Snorkel filling systems
(Snorkel as near as I could find:https://patents.google.com/patent/US2799247A )
Bonus:
I found some other fascinating things that AFAIK were never put into production but would have likely changed things Vis-a-vis Parker if they had:
Secondary Ink Chamber and Shutoff Valve:
Retractable Nib / Capless fountain pen
Extreme ways of dealing with over pressure
And last but certainly NOT least CAPILLARY Filling Snorkel!
Snorkel with a Capillary reservoir but quick filling
To the best of my (admittedly limited) knowledge, none of these things were put into production
It's fun to imagine how a capillary filling snorkel would have done against a Parker 61...
I hope this was entertaining and you learned something!

Just give me the Parker 51s and nobody needs to get hurt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 10
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • IThinkIHaveAProblem

    5

  • Nathaniel Harter

    3

  • Parker Quink Turquoise

    1

  • OCArt

    1

How cool, it's like finding industrial secrets!

 

I've recently fallen down the rabbit hole of Sheaffer pens. The Triumph style nibs (Early lifetime ones and later style) just draw me in.

...............................................................

We Are Our Ancestors’ Wildest Dreams

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

There is a prototype of this

there is!??

 

Are there pics or an article anywhere you can link to? PLS?

Just give me the Parker 51s and nobody needs to get hurt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

there is!??

 

Are there pics or an article anywhere you can link to? PLS?

That's a good idea, I'll write an article about it! Will link when done.

Nathaniel Harter
Sheaffer Pen Museum Volunteer
spmlogofpn.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's a good idea, I'll write an article about it! Will link when done.

Awesome. I can’t wait :)

Just give me the Parker 51s and nobody needs to get hurt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting stuff.Thanks for posting.

you're welcome! :)

Just give me the Parker 51s and nobody needs to get hurt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fascinating. When skimming over the text of the "capillary" patent and looking at the corresponding image, it seemed to just be describing a regular Snorkel. But if there actually *is* a prototype, as NathanielHarter said, that's really interesting.

Especially in light of my joking about how Sheaffer's response to the encroachment of ballpoints was to design the Snorkel (the most convoluted fill system on the planet) while Parkers's response was, well, the Parker 61 capillary fill....

And before you ask, the answer is "Yes, I have several of each...." :rolleyes:

Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth

"It's very nice, but frankly, when I signed that list for a P-51, what I had in mind was a fountain pen."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awesome. I can’t wait :)

 

 

Fascinating. When skimming over the text of the "capillary" patent and looking at the corresponding image, it seemed to just be describing a regular Snorkel. But if there actually *is* a prototype, as NathanielHarter said, that's really interesting.

Especially in light of my joking about how Sheaffer's response to the encroachment of ballpoints was to design the Snorkel (the most convoluted fill system on the planet) while Parkers's response was, well, the Parker 61 capillary fill....

And before you ask, the answer is "Yes, I have several of each...." :rolleyes:

Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth

Here is the article about the prototype capless pens: https://fountainpentastic.com/2020/05/22/sheaffer-1041-a-prototype-cap-less-fountain-pen/

Nathaniel Harter
Sheaffer Pen Museum Volunteer
spmlogofpn.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great article!

 

Anyone else think the pens look a lot like the new Curidas? To me, far more than the vanishing point.

 

I think that's a function of two things:

1- Most of them are made of clear (demonstrator) plastic, like the curidas

2- they all seem to be about the same visual "fatness" as a curidas. Whereas the VP seems slimmer. Again, that might be materials/optical illusion

 

Is it me, or does the D1 look like for a "nib" they just took a (fatter) snorkel tube and added a pointed bit and some tipping? kinda like if they grafted a Parker "51" nib onto a (fat) snorkel tube?

 

Thanks again for the article, it's really cool!

Just give me the Parker 51s and nobody needs to get hurt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43844
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      33494
    3. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    4. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      26624
    5. jar
      jar
      26101
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • Shanghai Knife Dude
      I have the Sailor Naginata and some fancy blade nibs coming after 2022 by a number of new workshop from China.  With all my respect, IMHO, they are all (bleep) in doing chinese characters.  Go use a bush, or at least a bush pen. 
    • A Smug Dill
      It is the reason why I'm so keen on the idea of a personal library — of pens, nibs, inks, paper products, etc. — and spent so much money, as well as time and effort, to “build” it for myself (because I can't simply remember everything, especially as I'm getting older fast) and my wife, so that we can “know”; and, instead of just disposing of what displeased us, or even just not good enough to be “given the time of day” against competition from >500 other pens and >500 other inks for our at
    • adamselene
      Agreed.  And I think it’s good to be aware of this early on and think about at the point of buying rather than rationalizing a purchase..
    • A Smug Dill
      Alas, one cannot know “good” without some idea of “bad” against which to contrast; and, as one of my former bosses (back when I was in my twenties) used to say, “on the scale of good to bad…”, it's a spectrum, not a dichotomy. Whereas subjectively acceptable (or tolerable) and unacceptable may well be a dichotomy to someone, and finding whether the threshold or cusp between them lies takes experiencing many degrees of less-than-ideal, especially if the decision is somehow influenced by factors o
    • adamselene
      I got my first real fountain pen on my 60th birthday and many hundreds of pens later I’ve often thought of what I should’ve known in the beginning. I have many pens, the majority of which have some objectionable feature. If they are too delicate, or can’t be posted, or they are too precious to face losing , still they are users, but only in very limited environments..  I have a big disliking for pens that have the cap jump into the air and fly off. I object to Pens that dry out, or leave blobs o
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...