Jump to content

Jinhao 650 - 'deep Sea Bright Pearl' – The Brass Behemoth



TheVintagelife

Recommended Posts

TheVintagelife

While I do not write too many reviews, posting this here, since I thought this is an interesting pen and there are very few reviews online, unlike the more common Jinhao models like the x450/750/159/992 etc.

 

General notes:

 

  1. This is one of the variants of the Jinhao 650. As far as I can tell, there is another in a red wood variant.
  2. This pen cost me the equivalent of $15. Not the cheapest Jinhao or indeed, Chinese pen out there, but still lower than most offerings of ‘upper end’ Chinese brands like penBBS, Moonman, Kaigelu, Lorelei etc., so firmly ‘mid range’ as Chinese offerings go. The pen in this review, therefore, will be judged according to the standards expected of this price range.
  3. The entire pen appears to be constructed of brass. The cap has a black laquer paint with gold-color plated clip and ring; the barrel is the same black laquer paint with the signature feature of this pen – the mother of pearl and abalone strips cut in small rectangular stripes(longer side arranged along the length of the pen) and arranged neatly in rows – 3 down and 6 around – 18 in total. The section appears to be plastic coating on a brass base.
  4. As regards the hardware – the clip is a sword and shield design, with the shield carrying the jinhao logo of a horse drawn chariot. The shield part of the logo is chrome while the rest of the clip (basically the sword part) is gold-color plated.
  5. The pen is a cartridge converter and comes with a aged-brass accented converted. the clip-ring is visible. There are other gold-finsihed rings at various places in the pen - namely - bottom of cap; joint between the thicker middle portion of the barrel and the thinner tail-end, and at the top of the section. the cap is a push-to-lock/ pull to open variety.
  6. It has a standard #6 two tone jinhao nib with 18KGP printed and the jinhao chariot motif. The nib was advertised as a 0.7mm line (which I’d say is on the broad side of medium or a Japanese broad). However, I find it to be provide a thinner line – about 0.5mm

fpn_1582128285__jinhao_650.jpg

 

 

Now, on to the qualitative review and some comparisons.

 

Build quality : 3.75/5: For $15, you get a really well built tank of a pen. Nothing rattles and everything feels solid. The execution is almost at par with plus $100 except for a couple of minor points:

1) The gold plating, while otherwise very well executed, appears to scuff easily. I already have some scuff marks around the bottom of the clip despite handling the pen very gently till date. It appears that the underlying chrome/brass will eventually show through in places sometime in the future

2) The ring at the bottom the barrel rotates freely and is not fixed to the barrel. I do not know if this is by design or just my piece, but I don’t think this should be the case.

 

fpn_1582138818__jinhao_2_-small.jpg

 

(The top finial is the same gold finish as the clip and bands. It looks pink in this picture, probably because of the uneven lighting)

 

Dimensions and Ergonomics 3.5/5: the pen is bloody heavy. Like really. Heavy. It is 65gms (2.2 oz) with cap on, and 36 gms (1.2 oz) without the cap. It is not overly lengthy though – at about 142mm with capped, 124mm uncapped, and 170mm posted. It posts securely but not deeply. The disappointing thing about the posting is that the cap does not travel all the way to the ring at the bottom of the barrel where there is a step up to the middle part of the barrel (see pic below). If the ring on the cap ended up flush with this step up point, I think it would have both looked neater and been a more comfortable length. As it is, I wouldn’t recommend posting as it backweights the pen too much.

 

Having said that, I do not find the weight overly uncomfortable (when un-posted). I like bigger (though not necessarily very heavy) pens, and while this is certainly the heaviest pen I own, it is surprisingly usable. This is mainly because the weight is mostly in the middle of the barrel (when un-posted) and this makes the pen very well balanced with the webbing between the thumb-forefinger taking the weight naturally.

 

Here is the pen next to the decidedly mid-sized Moonman M600s which also has the same general shape and price range (plus black finials and section). The length of the two are almost similar (with the 650 edging it slightly). But the 650 is appreciably thicker and more than twice as heavy (note that line width of the Jinhao's writing is very close to that of the 'F' nib in the Moonman - more of that later).

 

fpn_1582128301__moonman_m600s_and_jinhao

 

As you can see from the un-capped pictures - it has a short section with a step down from the barrel. However, I did not experience any discomfort in gripping the pen on this account (note: I do hold the pen quite low down - very close to the nib). It helps that it is a push to lock design and hence there are no threads. the section has a plastic feel and therefore is not very slippery. However, it can get slippery on prolonged use.

 

 

Appearance4.25/5 : it is an attractive design, which is bold but (in my opinion) just short of loud. The gold-accents are done extremely well for a pen of this price range. This is usually what looks cheap in most low end pens, but that is not the case here. The mother of pearl and abalone strips look the real deal – they have great depth and chatoyance and vibrancy of color – held up against the light, they look 3D – the pictures do not come close to doing them justice. It is amazing that this kind of material is being used a on $15 pen.

My only nitpick in this category is that that the drop in diameter between the middle of the barrel and the section on one end, and the bottom finial on the other, gives this almost a ‘kit pen’ type of appearance. This is personally off-putting though many won’t care. If the reduction in diameter served a purpose in helping the pen post flush with the bottom ring, it could be forgiven, but that is not the case, as discussed above.

 

fpn_1582138877__jinhao_-in_hand_-small.j

 

Writing performance: 4/5 The standard #6 jinhao nib is a very smooth and wrote smoothly out of the box. The ink flow was not the wettest, but not overly or unusably dry either; just on the dryer side of medium. By this I mean, medium blues like the Lamy blue I used for this review showed up lighter than the really wet pens, but amazingly, the nib kept up very well to fast writing, never skipped; and only rarely had a false start (that too if kept uncapped for a while). If used after a couple of days, the first stroke of the first letter may be a little thinner and then the pen immediately reverts to its normal line.

Overall, I would say a really good writing experience out of the box. Jinhao feeds are known to take a bit of time to really be primed, so, as expected, it became slightly wetter (about medium wetness) in a couple of days. It also helped that I ran a razor along the slit of the feed (just once was enough). Now I feel that the nib performs just as I would like. Quite happy really.

I was considering using one of the ‘wet Taiwan nibs’ from Bobby at esty; but after a few hours of trying one, I reverted to the Jinhao. I have too many ‘gushers’ already and the line was too fat for my liking, talking of which…

As mentioned above, this nib is finer than some of the other Jinhaos I have used, which is pleasant surprise (for me- personally like a medium-fine rather than a medium-broad).

The supplied cartridge converter does not have the greatest suction – I struggle to fill the entire tube despite repeated tries, which is a pity since it doesn’t have a great capacity to begin with (I’d say about 0.8 ml). However, it seems to be supplying the feed adequately as the feed has never dried up amidst writing, which has happened in a couple of my Moonmen/penBBSes.

 

A small written sample is below. Notice how the Lamy blue shows up into its 'middle' darkness for most part.

 

 

fpn_1582138888__jinhao_650_ws-small.jpg

 

 

Value: 4.5/5 : Are you kidding me – actual abalone and mother of pearl strips in a $15 pen and a build quality this good, makes the pen absolutely worth the money spent. I am deducting half a point since it may be a bit too heavy to be a daily writer for some and hence may find itself in a weird middle space of being too weighty for copious writing, but not a ‘posh’ enough to be a signature pen. However, as an occasional dalliance and a conversation piece (I lost count of how many colleagues asked me how expensive this pen was only to be shocked when I told them), it’s a great bargain.

Edited by TheVintagelife
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • TheVintagelife

    3

  • OCArt

    2

  • sansenri

    2

  • Beechwood

    1

Top Posters In This Topic

Thanks for the detailed review, I must admit that it is good to see a pen break away from the pack in terms of looks.

 

 

You havent mentionned the step down from the barrel to the section, it looks quite acute, but I presume that it is not an issue.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for a great review and nice photos. I have the same pen but haven't used it yet. I can't get a converter full of ink with most/all of my Chinese pens. Don't know why???

 

 

(much snipped...)

 

The supplied cartridge converter does not have the greatest suction – I struggle to fill the entire tube despite repeated tries, which is a pity since it doesn’t have a great capacity to begin with (I’d say about 0.8 ml).

 

 

"It's funny; in this era of email and voice mail and all those things that I did not even grow up with, a plain old paper letter takes on amazing intimacy."  Elizabeth Kostova

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

dreaded double post :(

Edited by OCArt

"It's funny; in this era of email and voice mail and all those things that I did not even grow up with, a plain old paper letter takes on amazing intimacy."  Elizabeth Kostova

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

nice review and pictures.
I cannot say the same for the pen, but that is a personal opinion.
Quite some time ago I did go through a Chinese phase and tried out several of the then available Jinhao pens, like the X450/500/750.

These brass pens have a similar construction and a low cost (often 4-5 $ shipping included).
The brass construction makes them extremely resistant, but mostly too heavy to handle comfortably.
In contrast to this, the external finish is often weak, plating wears off, enamel chips, other coloured coating often looks somewhat cheap.
The provided converters are very often faulty, and need replacement.
The nibs are usually not bad, smooth but very stiff. The gold plating on the nib is reasonably accurate.
The worst part I have often found is the threading section to barrel is gritty and inaccurate.
And those step downs barrel to section are not only steep but also sharp! ouch!

You have captured the essence of those issues quite well but have nonetheless considered them minor and have blessed the pen with a relatively positive judgement.
My personal opinion is that those issues, put together, are enough to steer well away from these pens, even for the price (I save the X750 which suffers less of the concomitant issues). The pen in object also looks ugly to me, but again that is just my opinion.

That said, your review is really well focused, clear and nicely done, thank you.

Edited by sansenri
Link to post
Share on other sites
TheVintagelife

Thanks for the detailed review, I must admit that it is good to see a pen break away from the pack in terms of looks.

 

 

You havent mentionned the step down from the barrel to the section, it looks quite acute, but I presume that it is not an issue.

 

Did talk about this a bit here:

 

 

 

 

As you can see from the un-capped pictures - it has a short section with a step down from the barrel. However, I did not experience any discomfort in gripping the pen on this account (note: I do hold the pen quite low down - very close to the nib). It helps that it is a push to lock design and hence there are no threads.
Edited by TheVintagelife
Link to post
Share on other sites
TheVintagelife

nice review and pictures.

I cannot say the same for the pen, but that is a personal opinion.

Quite some time ago I did go through a Chinese phase and tried out several of the then available Jinhao pens, like the X450/500/750.

 

These brass pens have a similar construction and a low cost (often 4-5 $ shipping included).

The brass construction makes them extremely resistant, but mostly too heavy to handle comfortably.

In contrast to this, the external finish is often weak, plating wears off, enamel chips, other coloured coating often looks somewhat cheap.

The provided converters are very often faulty, and need replacement.

The nibs are usually not bad, smooth but very stiff. The gold plating on the nib is reasonably accurate.

The worst part I have often found is the threading section to barrel is gritty and inaccurate.

And those step downs barrel to section are not only steep but also sharp! ouch!

 

You have captured the essence of those issues quite well but have nonetheless considered them minor and have blessed the pen with a relatively positive judgement.

My personal opinion is that those issues, put together, are enough to steer well away from these pens, even for the price (I save the X750 which suffers less of the concomitant issues). The pen in object also looks ugly to me, but again that is just my opinion.

 

That said, your review is really well focused, clear and nicely done, thank you.

 

Absolutely, I quite understand why these things will be problematic to some. This was mostly a $15 indulgence for me - I don't see myself using it extensively as I have other EDCs and of course its a little on the louder side (and not pedigreed enough) to flaunt in meetings. I find it 'interesting' for what it is. An occasional rotation piece to write some notes/ journal entries with....

Edited by TheVintagelife
Link to post
Share on other sites

I do understand your point, mind you, I indulged a few times too many then, and now find myself with a bunch of pens I should really get rid of, but then again I paid so little for them, so they lie around as spare pens scattered in pen holders in the office and at home...

 

At slightly higher prices my attention is all for traditional Indian treasures like some of the Gama ED pens...

Edited by sansenri
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      37512
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      30213
    3. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    4. jar
      jar
      26101
    5. wimg
      wimg
      25570
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • A Smug Dill
      Even so, you'd end up with a fragmented list, and it becomes an O(N²) process for each prospective requestor to check what is available: effectively recreate the list of currently active servers (without any reliable up-to-date info upfront about the inks and number of samples on offer in the thread) from the sequential list of posts, which may be spread over two or even more pages, and then query each server independently to check what is currently on offer.   It comes down to not hav
    • LizEF
      If one wanted to do this, one could just use the "About Me" field which appears to be unlimited in size.  And if a bunch of people wanted to cooperate, the Member Title field (or signature) could be used to this end - "Ink Giver" (or some such) could be used by those with inks to give...  No software edits required.
    • Arkanabar
      I suppose the update issue could be mitigated.  One would post a link in signature, to the particular part of your profile where you list the inks that you're willing to post samples to others, gratis.  But looking at profiles, I suspect that would require an edit to the board's software, potentially a nontrivial task.
    • A Smug Dill
      I read your idea as getting willing givers to publicly register as members of a set of heterogenous servers, in a system in which a client would explicitly select an available server from a list, to which he/she will then send a request privately and asynchronously. Request handling in the system is unmanaged, and individual requests are handled by the targeted servers completely independently on each other. I think the model is fine, although there are some operational concerns you may want to
    • Daneaxe
      First thought on the method/system of ink sharing: Think the best way, to begin with, is to follow the way of the US thread: offer up a (small) list of inks you are willing to PIF, to whoever expresses interest. Write clearly in the "mission statement" how it works, with a tiny "quid pro quo" that even a struggling student can comply with, i.e. post your opinion and a writing sample, with option of a full review if desired.   So yours truly might say: "I'm offering up samples of D
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Expiring Soon

    • By benbot517
      51 years and 5 months
    • By benbot517
      51 years and 5 months
    • By benbot517
      51 years and 5 months
    • By Okami
      51 years and 5 months
    • By Okami
      51 years and 5 months
  • Random Adverts

  • Files

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Adrianc
      Adrianc
    2. alcecena
      alcecena
      (70 years old)
    3. cchan
      cchan
      (29 years old)
    4. ChelleW
      ChelleW
      (48 years old)
    5. CooperCarl
      CooperCarl
      (51 years old)





×
×
  • Create New...