Jump to content

Would A Pilot 78G Bb Be Suitable For Humanist Roman Bookhands?



SIrNibCollector

Recommended Posts

SIrNibCollector

Would a Pilot 78G BB or B be suitable for these hands? If not, could you recommend an alternative in the same price range?

 

I know I've seen it chiefly recommended for Italic hands, but Pickering mentions a Rotring Art pen with a sharpened nib in his exemplar and those seem to be primarily used for Italic penmanship as well. Since the hands don't have massive variations in lineweight, I don't think I'll need it either, though it's possible they're subtle and I just don't yet have the eye to pick up on them.

 

http://www.jp29.org/00cal03.jpg

 

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a2/Bracciolini_-_ita%2C_neli_anni_di_Cristo_MCCCCLXXVI_a_octo_di_marzo_-_540471.jpg

Edited by SIrNibCollector
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 10
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • SIrNibCollector

    5

  • Inky.Fingers

    2

  • pepsiplease69

    1

  • BaronWulfraed

    1

pepsiplease69

The pilot should be good. I have limited experience with the rotring.

 

Maybe you should also consider a Lamy Safari where you have a wide range of nib widths to choose from. With the safari, you have a couple of things to be aware of. It has a triangular grip section which youre either going to love or hate. And you have a proprietary system from Lamy which wont work with non lamy nibs. You might also have to tweak it a bit if the flow is not generous.

 

The nib option for lamy are 1.1, 1.5, and 1.9. If you get just the one pen and multiple nib sizes you can swap them out anytime.

 

Alternatively you can try a noodlers konrad or ahab with bock or jowo #6 nibs. Same nib grade options as the lamy options mentioned above, but the ahab/konrad is a tinkerers pen. You wont see any flow issues with it.

 

Lastly, the pilot parallel may also be something you might consider. Its very popular with calligraphers.

Link to post
Share on other sites
SIrNibCollector

Thanks. I actually have a few Lamy Safaris, so I might look into acquiring some nibs. Any recommendations for the hands I linked to?

 

I don't have the experience to know which nib is appropriate for what. I just know that Pickering mentioned his Rotring Art pen with sharpened nib and a Waterman Ideal, which is not an Italic nib I don't think. Perhaps I should have just asked what type of nib would be suitable.

Edited by SIrNibCollector
Link to post
Share on other sites

Any straight edge would do. Pickering was referring to the extra-small lettering that he is best of.

 

When learning, use a large edged nib. The larger the easier to learn. Then progressive downgrade nib size as you feel comfortable. Eventually to a CI nib...that is a crisp italic nib. Same with CI...large first then small.

Link to post
Share on other sites
SIrNibCollector

Thanks. I guess I'll start by swapping out one of the Fine nibs in my Lamy Safari with a 1.1 mm nib and see how that treats me.

Link to post
Share on other sites
BaronWulfraed

Your second linked example appears to be typeset -- only the illuminated A (and the squiggle in the margin) might be done by hand.

 

Look at the capital Ms in the body... The left vertical is thinner than the right vertical. Doing that by pen would require rotating the hand for each stroke. Most calligraphy/italic hands are designed to have the pen held at a constant angle: the thickest line thereby being a diagonal in line with the pen, and the thinnest transverse to it. The rotation angle varies depending upon the hand.

 

Compare to (blatantly linked from Wikipedia), which is supposed to be an actual example of Poggio's handwriting.Poggio_handwriting.jpg

Examine the M in Morte -- wherein the \ diagonals are thicker than the / diagonals. The rest of the text tends to follow that behavior.

Link to post
Share on other sites
SIrNibCollector

Oh. I had wondered about that, but figured he was just using an odd technique. Unfortunately, you appear to be correct as I've found the page from the actual handwritten manuscript, and it's less machine-like in its regularity. Shame. It's not badly rendered, but it's not quite what I'm looking for either. I'll just stick to Pickering's hand, modified a bit with some inspiration from the typeset page. It's just a shame I can't find any instructional material for it.

 

https://brbl-media.library.yale.edu/images/1443163_quarter.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

You definitely can do it with a FP with a CI nib (fine or medium). I think traditionally they use a quill and the paper is quite different or vellum.

 

In any case, use a FP with fine/medium and grind to a CI.

 

http://www.marcuslink.com/pens/aboutpens/ludwig-tan.html

 

Should you want to try, else send the pen to someone who can do it for you.

 

However, I think it is most difficult to use unless you are well endowed with skills to use a CI.

And, it is a very slow writing on very good paper.

 

Good Luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does the nib produce line variation between horizontals and verticals? If yes, BB is better than an F for beginners. You will write larger letter shapes with the broader nib, which helps to master letter shapes (most calligraphic letters consist of more than 1-2 pen strokes). Example of line variation:

 

fpn_1540074372__img_0631.jpg

 

The black is a 2.3mm italic (actually stub) Rotring Artpen (a B is around 0.9 and a BB around 1.1.-1.2mm in width). The blue is a regular medium Parker IM.

 

Sharpened Artpens would cease to be stubs. A stub has rounded rather than razor-type edges at the point of contact with the paper, so they do write even if you hold the pen vertically on the paper. As you might have guessed stubs -virtually all steel italic nibs are stubs these days- are better for beginners and can perform modern calligraphy as well as old-style calligraphy, so most professionals like them as they come from the factory.

Link to post
Share on other sites

To address your original question: The Pilot 78G B and BB nibs are more than adequate for italic, gothic, humanist bookhand or any other script requiring a chisel-tipped nib. I agree with _Inky that a broader nib is preferred when first learning a new script. The Pilot BB is around 1.5 mm, I believe. The B is around 1.0mm. If you want to use a fine chisel nib, I find the Pilot B is much better than the Lamy 1.1. The wider Lamy italic nibs are pretty crisp.

 

Another good, relatively inexpensive option is the Kaweco calligraphy set. Those are #5 Bock nibs and can be swapped into any pen that uses those nibs.

 

Custom grinding nibs is a whole other set of issues.

 

David

Link to post
Share on other sites
SIrNibCollector

In that case, I'll pick up a Lamy 1.5mm nib and the Pilot BB to compare semi-familiar against unfamiliar. The Kaweco calligraphy set definitely looks interesting, and I'll set my sights on that dependent on my upcoming experience. Thanks for the advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      37512
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      30258
    3. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    4. jar
      jar
      26101
    5. wimg
      wimg
      25570
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • A Smug Dill
      Even so, you'd end up with a fragmented list, and it becomes an O(N²) process for each prospective requestor to check what is available: effectively recreate the list of currently active servers (without any reliable up-to-date info upfront about the inks and number of samples on offer in the thread) from the sequential list of posts, which may be spread over two or even more pages, and then query each server independently to check what is currently on offer.   It comes down to not hav
    • LizEF
      If one wanted to do this, one could just use the "About Me" field which appears to be unlimited in size.  And if a bunch of people wanted to cooperate, the Member Title field (or signature) could be used to this end - "Ink Giver" (or some such) could be used by those with inks to give...  No software edits required.
    • Arkanabar
      I suppose the update issue could be mitigated.  One would post a link in signature, to the particular part of your profile where you list the inks that you're willing to post samples to others, gratis.  But looking at profiles, I suspect that would require an edit to the board's software, potentially a nontrivial task.
    • A Smug Dill
      I read your idea as getting willing givers to publicly register as members of a set of heterogenous servers, in a system in which a client would explicitly select an available server from a list, to which he/she will then send a request privately and asynchronously. Request handling in the system is unmanaged, and individual requests are handled by the targeted servers completely independently on each other. I think the model is fine, although there are some operational concerns you may want to
    • Daneaxe
      First thought on the method/system of ink sharing: Think the best way, to begin with, is to follow the way of the US thread: offer up a (small) list of inks you are willing to PIF, to whoever expresses interest. Write clearly in the "mission statement" how it works, with a tiny "quid pro quo" that even a struggling student can comply with, i.e. post your opinion and a writing sample, with option of a full review if desired.   So yours truly might say: "I'm offering up samples of D
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Expiring Soon

    • By benbot517
      51 years and 5 months
    • By benbot517
      51 years and 5 months
    • By benbot517
      51 years and 5 months
    • By Vicary
      51 years and 5 months
    • By Okami
      51 years and 5 months
  • Random Adverts

  • Files

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. 123mjc92
      123mjc92
      (29 years old)
    2. 77kath
      77kath
    3. abs
      abs
      (49 years old)
    4. baxtrom
      baxtrom
      (43 years old)
    5. clrobert60
      clrobert60
      (61 years old)





×
×
  • Create New...