Jump to content

Faber Castell Progress 44P ?



Recommended Posts

Is anyone able to tell me anything about a new acquisition?

 

Picked up on ebay for not a lot as an impulse purchase.

 

Standard smallish plastic pen with a hooded nib and a stainless steel cap (with cone finial).

 

Appears to be a cartridge converter (standard international?).

 

Faber Castell Progress on the cap band

 

44p lightly engraved on barrell with either an OF or OS below it.

 

Nib is probably steel (or chromed).

 

Currently soaking as the feed is rather clogged with blue ink.

 

I'm guessing inexpensive late 60's early 70s?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 2
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • ManofKent

    2

  • OMASsimo

    1

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Sounds like a standard description of the Progress line of pens from the mid 60s. Surprisingly, this pen was marketed under both names, Faber-Castell or Osmia Progress, and came in various sizes, designs, and nib qualities. 44 stands for the size (smallish) and P for cartridge ('Patrone'). I have a 77S which is a decently sized piston filler with a steel nib (77G had a 14k gold nib). It's a reliable workhorse pen, not comparable to one from the glorious Osmia times, but you don't see very many of them.

 

Enjoy the pen - and I'd love to see pictures if you have a chance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like a standard description of the Progress line of pens from the mid 60s. Surprisingly, this pen was marketed under both names, Faber-Castell or Osmia Progress, and came in various sizes, designs, and nib qualities. 44 stands for the size (smallish) and P for cartridge ('Patrone'). I have a 77S which is a decently sized piston filler with a steel nib (77G had a 14k gold nib). It's a reliable workhorse pen, not comparable to one from the glorious Osmia times, but you don't see very many of them.

 

Enjoy the pen - and I'd love to see pictures if you have a chance.

 

Thanks - Apologies for cameraphone quality:

 

post-135466-0-50978700-1493196562_thumb.jpg

 

post-135466-0-49852500-1493196576_thumb.jpg

 

Inked up it reminds me of a Parker Jotter - writes without skipping, nail like nib, fine to medium line - smooth enough but with quite definite feedback.

Edited by ManofKent
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      37512
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      30258
    3. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    4. jar
      jar
      26101
    5. wimg
      wimg
      25570
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • A Smug Dill
      Even so, you'd end up with a fragmented list, and it becomes an O(N²) process for each prospective requestor to check what is available: effectively recreate the list of currently active servers (without any reliable up-to-date info upfront about the inks and number of samples on offer in the thread) from the sequential list of posts, which may be spread over two or even more pages, and then query each server independently to check what is currently on offer.   It comes down to not hav
    • LizEF
      If one wanted to do this, one could just use the "About Me" field which appears to be unlimited in size.  And if a bunch of people wanted to cooperate, the Member Title field (or signature) could be used to this end - "Ink Giver" (or some such) could be used by those with inks to give...  No software edits required.
    • Arkanabar
      I suppose the update issue could be mitigated.  One would post a link in signature, to the particular part of your profile where you list the inks that you're willing to post samples to others, gratis.  But looking at profiles, I suspect that would require an edit to the board's software, potentially a nontrivial task.
    • A Smug Dill
      I read your idea as getting willing givers to publicly register as members of a set of heterogenous servers, in a system in which a client would explicitly select an available server from a list, to which he/she will then send a request privately and asynchronously. Request handling in the system is unmanaged, and individual requests are handled by the targeted servers completely independently on each other. I think the model is fine, although there are some operational concerns you may want to
    • Daneaxe
      First thought on the method/system of ink sharing: Think the best way, to begin with, is to follow the way of the US thread: offer up a (small) list of inks you are willing to PIF, to whoever expresses interest. Write clearly in the "mission statement" how it works, with a tiny "quid pro quo" that even a struggling student can comply with, i.e. post your opinion and a writing sample, with option of a full review if desired.   So yours truly might say: "I'm offering up samples of D
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Expiring Soon

    • By benbot517
      51 years and 5 months
    • By benbot517
      51 years and 5 months
    • By benbot517
      51 years and 5 months
    • By Vicary
      51 years and 5 months
    • By Okami
      51 years and 5 months
  • Random Adverts

  • Files

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. 123mjc92
      123mjc92
      (29 years old)
    2. 77kath
      77kath
    3. abs
      abs
      (49 years old)
    4. baxtrom
      baxtrom
      (43 years old)
    5. clrobert60
      clrobert60
      (61 years old)





×
×
  • Create New...