Jump to content

Dating Recent Montblanc 146



lvda

Recommended Posts

Dear All,

 

Hope that some of the experts here are able to help me. I am moving my interest from vintage to newer versions. Thanks to the various discussions here on dating I think I have a general clue on how to date the vintage versions. However, I now would like to buy the very latest version of the normal 146 (but still preferably 'used', in order to get it a bit cheaper).

 

So my questions are the following:

  • when was the latest change in the standard 146?
  • what were the changes (internally? use of the 'pink bubblegum'? externally?) and, most importantly, how can I recognise the latest version?

Many thanks for your help!!

 

Lucas

 

p.s. would that be the same for the 149?

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 2
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • lvda

    2

  • Valdair

    1

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

According to this thread, the "modern" 146 was standardized in 1992, with a 14K two-tone nib and striated ink window. There have been some alterations to authentication markings, most notably a period where "Pix" was stamped under the clip, then eventually on the cap band and under the clip, and the most modern 146s have "Made in Germany" and "Metal" underneath the clip (my 146 platinum, purchased last summer has the latter though I have a 145 from the mid-2000s with "Pix" on the cap band and under the clip). The generation before that was the 1970s~1980s model, which was ever so slightly smaller both in width and length, with a monotone 14k nib and non-striated ink window. There were some minor changes to the feed over that time and there are some early transition models with a blue ink window rather than a grey one.

 

The 146 has basically looked identical since 1992, though, and most pens you see for sale that aren't marked "Vintage" or something like that will be "modern".

Link to post
Share on other sites

Valdair,

 

Thanks for the clarification. I was aware of the older thread, but I thought that there might have been changes again since then. E.g. I thought I read somewhere that Montblanc has stopped using the pink bubble gum in the section, but I might have misunderstood.

 

Thanks again! Lucas

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Announcements


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      37512
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      30257
    3. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    4. jar
      jar
      26101
    5. wimg
      wimg
      25570
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • A Smug Dill
      Even so, you'd end up with a fragmented list, and it becomes an O(N²) process for each prospective requestor to check what is available: effectively recreate the list of currently active servers (without any reliable up-to-date info upfront about the inks and number of samples on offer in the thread) from the sequential list of posts, which may be spread over two or even more pages, and then query each server independently to check what is currently on offer.   It comes down to not hav
    • LizEF
      If one wanted to do this, one could just use the "About Me" field which appears to be unlimited in size.  And if a bunch of people wanted to cooperate, the Member Title field (or signature) could be used to this end - "Ink Giver" (or some such) could be used by those with inks to give...  No software edits required.
    • Arkanabar
      I suppose the update issue could be mitigated.  One would post a link in signature, to the particular part of your profile where you list the inks that you're willing to post samples to others, gratis.  But looking at profiles, I suspect that would require an edit to the board's software, potentially a nontrivial task.
    • A Smug Dill
      I read your idea as getting willing givers to publicly register as members of a set of heterogenous servers, in a system in which a client would explicitly select an available server from a list, to which he/she will then send a request privately and asynchronously. Request handling in the system is unmanaged, and individual requests are handled by the targeted servers completely independently on each other. I think the model is fine, although there are some operational concerns you may want to
    • Daneaxe
      First thought on the method/system of ink sharing: Think the best way, to begin with, is to follow the way of the US thread: offer up a (small) list of inks you are willing to PIF, to whoever expresses interest. Write clearly in the "mission statement" how it works, with a tiny "quid pro quo" that even a struggling student can comply with, i.e. post your opinion and a writing sample, with option of a full review if desired.   So yours truly might say: "I'm offering up samples of D
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Expiring Soon

    • By benbot517
      51 years and 5 months
    • By benbot517
      51 years and 5 months
    • By benbot517
      51 years and 5 months
    • By Okami
      51 years and 5 months
    • By Okami
      51 years and 5 months
  • Random Adverts

  • Files

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. 123mjc92
      123mjc92
      (29 years old)
    2. 77kath
      77kath
    3. abs
      abs
      (49 years old)
    4. baxtrom
      baxtrom
      (43 years old)
    5. clrobert60
      clrobert60
      (61 years old)





×
×
  • Create New...