Jump to content

Ten Notebook Bleed-Through Battle

jaysongo
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 149
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • jaysongo

    122

  • bob_hayden

    6

  • DrDebG

    4

  • KKay

    4

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Posted Images

jaysongo Mint

jaysongo

Posted
  • Author
Posted
SCORECARD
Round VI Standings:
1. Clairefontaine - 4.0
2. Maruman Mnemosyne - 6.0
T3. Rhodia 80gsm - 6.5
T3. Staples Sustainable Earth - 6.5
5. Cambridge - 7.0
6. Black n' Red (Germany) - 10.0
7. Black n' Red (Poland) - 10.5
8. Five Star Heavyweight - 13.5
9. Hilroy - 15.0

10. Staples Notes - 18.5

 

Overall Standings:

 

1. Clairefontaine - 8.5

2. Maruman Mnemosyne - 16.5
3. Rhodia 80gsm - 17.5

T4. Cambridge - 21.0
T4. Staples Sustainable Earth - 21.0

6. Black n' Red (Germany) - 31.5
7. Black n' Red (Poland) - 53.0
8. Five Star Heavyweight - 59.0
9. Hilroy - 60.5
10. Staples Notes - 119.0
Cumulative Bleed-Through Score By Sample:
Sample 51 - 3.0
Sample 52 - 16.5
Sample 53 - 54.0
Sample 54 - 0.5
Sample 55 - 0.0
Sample 56 - 3.0
Sample 57 - 7.0
Sample 58 - 2.5
Sample 59 - 2.5
Sample 60 - 8.5
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
jaysongo Mint

jaysongo

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Excellent work, thank you!

Thanks, it's great to hear that people enjoy this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jaysongo Mint

jaysongo

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)

SCORECARD

000Scoring.jpg

Round VII Standings:

1. Maruman Mnemosyne - 2.0

T2. Cambridge - 3.0
T2. Clairefontaine - 3.0
4. Staples Sustainable Earth - 3.5
5. Rhodia 80gsm - 4.0
6. Black n' Red (Germany) - 6.0
7. Black n' Red (Poland) - 7.0
8. Hilroy - 10.0
9. Five Star Heavyweight - 10.5
10. Staples Notes - 14.5

Overall Standings:

1. Clairefontaine - 11.5
2. Maruman Mnemosyne - 18.5
3. Rhodia 80gsm - 21.5
4. Cambridge - 24.0
5. Staples Sustainable Earth - 24.5
6. Black n' Red (Germany) - 37.5
7. Black n' Red (Poland) - 60.0
8. Five Star Heavyweight - 69.5
9. Hilroy - 70.5
10. Staples Notes - 133.5

Cumulative Bleed-Through Score By Sample:

Sample 61 - 4.5
Sample 62 - 6.0
Sample 63 - 2.5
Sample 64 - 1.0
Sample 65 - 6.0
Sample 66 - 3.5
Sample 67 - 0.5
Sample 68 - 10.5
Sample 69 - 23.0
Sample 70 - 6.0

Notes:

- I've added a refresher of the scoring rationale to the top of this post, to help from having to refer to the very cluttered first page of this thread. As always, a plus sign indicates that the ink has bled onto the subsequent sheet and the number following it indicates the number of sides bled onto.
Edited by jaysongo
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43844
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      33583
    3. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    4. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      26772
    5. jar
      jar
      26105

  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • Shanghai Knife Dude
      Links to web pages or articles about Chinese typesetting, signwriting, etc.

      By Shanghai Knife Dude · Posted

      I have the Sailor Naginata and some fancy blade nibs coming after 2022 by a number of new workshop from China.  With all my respect, IMHO, they are all (bleep) in doing chinese characters.  Go use a bush, or at least a bush pen. 
    • A Smug Dill
      Skeleton of a primer for a budding hobbyist

      By A Smug Dill · Posted

      It is the reason why I'm so keen on the idea of a personal library — of pens, nibs, inks, paper products, etc. — and spent so much money, as well as time and effort, to “build” it for myself (because I can't simply remember everything, especially as I'm getting older fast) and my wife, so that we can “know”; and, instead of just disposing of what displeased us, or even just not good enough to be “given the time of day” against competition from >500 other pens and >500 other inks for our at
    • adamselene
      Skeleton of a primer for a budding hobbyist

      By adamselene · Posted

      Agreed.  And I think it’s good to be aware of this early on and think about at the point of buying rather than rationalizing a purchase..
    • A Smug Dill
      Skeleton of a primer for a budding hobbyist

      By A Smug Dill · Posted

      Alas, one cannot know “good” without some idea of “bad” against which to contrast; and, as one of my former bosses (back when I was in my twenties) used to say, “on the scale of good to bad…”, it's a spectrum, not a dichotomy. Whereas subjectively acceptable (or tolerable) and unacceptable may well be a dichotomy to someone, and finding whether the threshold or cusp between them lies takes experiencing many degrees of less-than-ideal, especially if the decision is somehow influenced by factors o
    • adamselene
      Skeleton of a primer for a budding hobbyist

      By adamselene · Posted

      I got my first real fountain pen on my 60th birthday and many hundreds of pens later I’ve often thought of what I should’ve known in the beginning. I have many pens, the majority of which have some objectionable feature. If they are too delicate, or can’t be posted, or they are too precious to face losing , still they are users, but only in very limited environments..  I have a big disliking for pens that have the cap jump into the air and fly off. I object to Pens that dry out, or leave blobs o

  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More

  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...