Jump to content

How Far We Can Define A Pen As Vintage!



Recommended Posts

Just my two cents: every pen older than a Parker 45 is vintage to me. And every pen after it is modern (Parker 45 included). Simple classification.

 

This is different from saying a pen has vintage looks. For example, that's the case of Pelikan M101N and M120N: modern pens that look like actual vintage pens.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 143
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Manalto

    16

  • H1N

    13

  • praxim

    13

  • Ursus

    11

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

The first couple of fountain pen collecting books that I got ahold of seemed to bring vintage (the golden age) into the early 40's, followed by modern from late 40's or 1950 up to the 80's, and contemporary from the 80's on. That's how I learned to think of them.

 

Of course, those books are 20 or more years old now themselves, and while they are useful they are no longer "contemporary" ;)

 

I concentrate on Pelikan with a growing love for MB and a large collection of Sheaffer types on the side (the beginnings of my pen addiction). Since I learned to call pens made up to the war years "vintage" and pens made after "modern", I now think of my collecting in terms of

1920-1948 or 1949 vintage

1950-1980 early modern

1981-early 1990's modern

mid-1990's to current contemporary

 

The term "classic" is then reserved for those key pens that marked something special... the Balance, P51, Lamy 2000, 400, Meisterstuck 149, etc. rather than a time period. Less confusing to me anyway, although perhaps not to other folks.

"Inspiration exists, but it has to find you working." -Pablo Picasso


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 1 month later...

Pens older than a hundred years

 

Was that also true in 1997?

 

How about in 1980?

 

Just trying to clarify your system for me. :)

X

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't understand why the cutoff should depend on a filling system (c/c). It's like saying a pen can't be antique unless it's a 19th century eyedropper, and all those lever-fillers approaching a hundred years old should be forever excluded. Even in the year 3000.

Link to post
Share on other sites
FOUR X FOUR

I don't understand why the cutoff should depend on a filling system (c/c). It's like saying a pen can't be antique unless it's a 19th century eyedropper, and all those lever-fillers approaching a hundred years old should be forever excluded. Even in the year 3000.

When I said the cutoff point should be 4 years, I was just trying to be humorous. Every body knows it's really 5 years. 😀
Link to post
Share on other sites

5 years, eh? Wow. All my ties are vintage! Who knew?

 

When you get done defining "Vintage" I think we should start another thread to define "Rare".

 

And the first person to post "walk the cow by the fire and then lead it to my table" has to buy the next round of inks.

"Inspiration exists, but it has to find you working." -Pablo Picasso


Link to post
Share on other sites

There are two terms in this realm that I have completely given up on trying to pin down. People will constantly misuse the terms, and now are even indignant if you bring up any form of calibration so that they actually mean something. When they mean different things to different people, they essentially become meaningless.

 

The terms? Vintage and grail (pen).

"When Men differ in Opinion, both Sides ought equally to have the Advantage of being heard by the Publick; and that when Truth and Error have fair Play, the former is always an overmatch for the latter."

~ Benjamin Franklin

Link to post
Share on other sites
inkstainedruth

5 years, eh? Wow. All my ties are vintage! Who knew?

 

When you get done defining "Vintage" I think we should start another thread to define "Rare".

 

And the first person to post "walk the cow by the fire and then lead it to my table" has to buy the next round of inks.

 

A friend of mine wanted a burger made from beef on an animal who's mother had been scared by a fire.... B)

Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth

"It's very nice, but frankly, when I signed that list for a P-51, what I had in mind was a fountain pen."

Link to post
Share on other sites
FOUR X FOUR

Off the top of my head, I would think 50 years would be a good starting point

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

When you get done defining "Vintage" I think we should start another thread to define "Rare".

 

I have the eBay definition of rare, if that helps: common and/or in poor condition

 

ETA: I know it doesn't help.

Edited by Manalto

James

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

And there are the 'extremely rare' and the 'hard to find' ones on ebay and other auction sites. Probably those are the frankenpens.

Khan M. Ilyas

Link to post
Share on other sites

And there are the 'extremely rare' and the 'hard to find' ones on ebay and other auction sites. Probably those are the frankenpens.

 

 

My experience as well. Although my first ever Pelikan turned out to be a frankenpen, it also turned out to be a fantastic writer so I'm not unhappy and finding the "correct" model wasn't difficult. I did see an "extremely rare" M150 for $999 OBO awhile back :wallbash:

"Inspiration exists, but it has to find you working." -Pablo Picasso


Link to post
Share on other sites

Frankly, I don't see the allure of 'rare' when it comes to something that may need replacement parts.

 

Isn't it nice, then, that it's not for everyone?

"When Men differ in Opinion, both Sides ought equally to have the Advantage of being heard by the Publick; and that when Truth and Error have fair Play, the former is always an overmatch for the latter."

~ Benjamin Franklin

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

This may make sense as a feeling one has, but on the other hand words should communicate something; and especially on the web where no one can see how old people are, such a subjective definition would make it very difficult to guess what a person means when he uses the word.

 

Doesn't get it.

"Don't hurry, don't worry. It's better to be late at the Golden Gate than to arrive in Hell on time."
--Sign in a bar and grill, Ormond Beach, Florida, 1960.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

In the antique trade (in which I was slightly involved once) a piece was considered vintage if it was (roughly) more than thirty years old. So Eighties pens would be considered Vintage.

An Antique item would be a hundred years old, more or less, so most of my BCHR pens would hover around that designation.

In China, a ceramic piece would get a red stamp if it was 100 years old (a small selection of low-end plates from the Ming period came stamped).

I miss the antique shows.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This topic has been bantered around here, on other boards, at pen shows, and in personal conversations for as long as I have been involved in the hobby. As is the case in this thread, there has been no consensus to date - not anywhere, not any time, no way, no how.

 

So, just to contribute to the confusion I'll offer my definition. I think of vintage as associated primarily with age of the object (pen). I tend to see 1960 as the delineation between vintage and 'modern' pens. This puts the cut-off over forty years ago, but, along with age, this date choice is also based on personal experiences. My parents used fountain pens until sometime in the late fifties to around 1960. At that point I began to see ball points in use in the house and the fountain pens went into drawers. That change has influenced my choice of 1960, however my affinity for using age as the primary determining factor has me waffling and beginning to consider some 1960s pens as vintage. See - I can't even be definitive in my own use of the word; how will we ever get to a commonly agreed to definition?

 

We won't.

 

When considering a pen, get the needed information to determine if it fits YOUR criteria and call it vintage or not.

 

Confused D.C.

D.C. in PA - Always bitin' off more than I can chew.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      37512
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      30258
    3. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    4. jar
      jar
      26101
    5. wimg
      wimg
      25570
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • A Smug Dill
      Even so, you'd end up with a fragmented list, and it becomes an O(N²) process for each prospective requestor to check what is available: effectively recreate the list of currently active servers (without any reliable up-to-date info upfront about the inks and number of samples on offer in the thread) from the sequential list of posts, which may be spread over two or even more pages, and then query each server independently to check what is currently on offer.   It comes down to not hav
    • LizEF
      If one wanted to do this, one could just use the "About Me" field which appears to be unlimited in size.  And if a bunch of people wanted to cooperate, the Member Title field (or signature) could be used to this end - "Ink Giver" (or some such) could be used by those with inks to give...  No software edits required.
    • Arkanabar
      I suppose the update issue could be mitigated.  One would post a link in signature, to the particular part of your profile where you list the inks that you're willing to post samples to others, gratis.  But looking at profiles, I suspect that would require an edit to the board's software, potentially a nontrivial task.
    • A Smug Dill
      I read your idea as getting willing givers to publicly register as members of a set of heterogenous servers, in a system in which a client would explicitly select an available server from a list, to which he/she will then send a request privately and asynchronously. Request handling in the system is unmanaged, and individual requests are handled by the targeted servers completely independently on each other. I think the model is fine, although there are some operational concerns you may want to
    • Daneaxe
      First thought on the method/system of ink sharing: Think the best way, to begin with, is to follow the way of the US thread: offer up a (small) list of inks you are willing to PIF, to whoever expresses interest. Write clearly in the "mission statement" how it works, with a tiny "quid pro quo" that even a struggling student can comply with, i.e. post your opinion and a writing sample, with option of a full review if desired.   So yours truly might say: "I'm offering up samples of D
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Expiring Soon

    • By benbot517
      51 years and 5 months
    • By benbot517
      51 years and 5 months
    • By benbot517
      51 years and 5 months
    • By Vicary
      51 years and 5 months
    • By Okami
      51 years and 5 months
  • Random Adverts

  • Files

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. AndreaDuni
      AndreaDuni
      (46 years old)
    2. bbodson
      bbodson
      (67 years old)
    3. bighappygoth39
      bighappygoth39
      (51 years old)
    4. darrin1200
      darrin1200
      (56 years old)
    5. gandalf11
      gandalf11
      (59 years old)





×
×
  • Create New...