Jump to content

Please Help Me Date This Vacumatic!


ThirdeYe

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone! I was at an antiques market today and found some good deals on a few pens. Apparently it was from an estate of a collector and there were over 700 excellent pens, including many Sheaffer, Parker, Waterman, Conway-Stewart, Eversharp, etc.

 

I ended up grabbing a few with the little cash I had on hand, including this Vacumatic. All of my Vacumatics are the plastic filler from the 1940s, but this one had a lockdown filler that intrigued me, plus I have a matching pencil for it that I've had for a few years already. I also enjoy the way these double-jeweled pens look. This one isn't in the greatest cosmetic condition, but the nib looks straight and smooth and it'll be a good user-grade pen. I know it also needs restoration, but for $32.50, I can't complain.

 

I've been trying to date this pen and I'm completely confused. The nib says "36" with no dots. I assume this means 3rd quarter 1936. No real confusion there. However, the imprint on the barrel is ".47.", I was under the impression that the only 2 digit date codes with dots were from the late 40s/early 50s? I have a few Vacs in my collection with single digit date codes with dots, but nothing like this. I am also aware that some Vacumatics had 2 digit date codes, but all of the sources I'm finding say nothing about dots along with 2 digits... just one. Could anyone help with this? I have attached some pics, hopefully they turned out as it was hard to get my phone to focus that closely.

Thanks! I really appreciate it.

 

http://i326.photobucket.com/albums/k420/ThirdeYe1337/20150531_211102_zpsj2xyjxtt.jpg

 

http://i326.photobucket.com/albums/k420/ThirdeYe1337/20150531_210707_zpsrpybhaxh.jpg

 

http://i326.photobucket.com/albums/k420/ThirdeYe1337/20150531_211208_zpszwnj92dq.jpg

Derek's Pens and Pencils

I am always looking for new penpals! Send me a pm if you'd like to exchange correspondence. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 16
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • ThirdeYe

    4

  • Lazard 20

    3

  • penmanila

    2

  • corgicoupe

    2

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

4th quarter, 1937.

 

That's what I was kinda thinking, but the dots threw me off. I'm also guessing that the nib is 3rd quarter yet the pen is 4th quarter, maybe made around the time they did the changeover for that quarter?

Derek's Pens and Pencils

I am always looking for new penpals! Send me a pm if you'd like to exchange correspondence. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The dots just narrow things down to quarters, so I don't mind them too much. It's really the general shape and features of the body (cap, barrel and blind cap) that will tell you the Vac generation, and the imprint will then yield the year. Mastering Vac taxonomy takes a bit of learning given all the variants, but it's not rocket science ;) nice pen (a Major) you got there for a great price.

Check out my blog and my pens

Link to comment
Share on other sites

+1 on what pen manila said about the price. I have a Silver Pearl Major (don't recall the date code offhand) and I paid more than twice what you did a couple of years ago on Ebay. Mind, it didn't need to have the diaphragm or any other repair work done when I got it.

I also paid a little under that for an Azure Blue Pearl Debutante or Sub-Debutante (opinions vary) but with the refurbishing costing more than I paid for the pen it ended up being more expensive than the Major (OTOH, I got the pen on Saturday at DCSS two summers ago, and on Sunday got it overhauled with a new diaphragm at the Indy-Pen-Dance table -- on the spot with no waiting). :thumbup:

Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth

"It's very nice, but frankly, when I signed that list for a P-51, what I had in mind was a fountain pen."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice catch. Just don't tell everyone where the shop is, the pens will disappear on you if you tell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was in a very populated antiques market that happens once a month. I'm sure most of the pens are gone by now. Perhaps some other members here were lucky to pick up a few. The table was crowded and I was hardly able to really take a good amount of time to sort through them all properly.

 

Also, about this pen, based on the date codes wouldn't the nib be 3rd quarter 1936 and the pen itself be 4th quarter 1937? I'm guessing these have to be mismatched, unless there's something else I'm missing.

Edited by ThirdeYe

Derek's Pens and Pencils

I am always looking for new penpals! Send me a pm if you'd like to exchange correspondence. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

these "mismatches" between nib and barrel are pretty common with vacs and aren't a big deal. an earlier nib means they had some left over, and put them on the newer pens. the more important consideration, for correctness' sake, is that nib and body should belong to the same generation, as yours do.

Check out my blog and my pens

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I stand corrected on the nib. After looking at it more closely, the nib says "37" not "36", so I believe the pen to be from the last quarter of 1937 after all. That makes more sense than a 36 nib being paired with a 47 date coded body :) Thanks for the help everyone.

Derek's Pens and Pencils

I am always looking for new penpals! Send me a pm if you'd like to exchange correspondence. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some questions about barrels and nibs date code with 2 digits and dots.

 

Until at least the second quarter of 1938 we can observe this code system.

In this system of two digits, we only can see three options(*), namely: without dot, with 1 dot and with 2 dots, so my theory is that, in these cases, the DOTS MEAN MONTHS of quarter, so, e.g.:

27 June-1937 (third month of the second quarter of 1937)
.37. July-1937 (first month of the third quarter)
37. August 1937 (second month of the third quarter)
37 September 1937 (third month of the third quarter)
.47. October 1937 (first month fourth quarter)

...

 

.18. January 1938

18. February 1938

18 March 1938

.28. April 1938

 

(*) In contrast to code date single-digit that there are 4 options (0, 1, 2 or 3 dots) as many quarters.

 

Some examples:

 

http://s17.postimg.org/il6cswujj/Lazard_Parker_Vacumatic_2digits_dots.jpg

Edited by Lazard 20
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would like to know how you take those closeups.

 

The first one has a single digit code 3 followed by one dot, the long blind cap, and a black section. The jewels on both ends of the pen are black.

 

Perhaps one of you can help me date these Vacumatics. The second one has no date code, and has the short blind cap with the lock-down filler, and the section has the same pattern as the cap and body. The third photo shows the jewel on the short blind cap, and the jewel on the pen cap is the same. There is a name E.C. Brown nicely engraved in cursive along the body of the pen, but is only visible with a lens.

 

 

post-120091-0-18692200-1433891792_thumb.jpg

post-120091-0-75197000-1433891793_thumb.jpg

post-120091-0-54729100-1433891795_thumb.jpg

Baptiste knew how to make a short job long

For love of it. And yet not waste time either.

Robert Frost

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would like to know how you take those closeups.

 

The first one has a single digit code 3 followed by one dot, the long blind cap, and a black section. The jewels on both ends of the pen are black.

 

Perhaps one of you can help me date these Vacumatics. The second one has no date code, and has the short blind cap with the lock-down filler, and the section has the same pattern as the cap and body. The third photo shows the jewel on the short blind cap, and the jewel on the pen cap is the same. There is a name E.C. Brown nicely engraved in cursive along the body of the pen, but is only visible with a lens.

 

 

 

The first one has a coherent barrel with the third quarter of 1943. I would like to see a photograph of the blind cap because "the jewels on both ends.."

 

The second one will be prior to mid 1934 when the coding system appears (the oldest imprint I've seen with code date is third quarter of 1934).

 

As others curiosities the clip has "wide feather" both above and below consistent with first vacs, the "misalignment" of alternating layers of celluloid is also typical of the first vacs, the thread of the blind cap will in the celluloid -not in a metal cover- and in the imprint we can read MADE IN USA with PAT. (PAT disappears one year later).

Edited by Lazard 20
Link to comment
Share on other sites

More photos addressing your points. The first two show the jewels on the two pens; all are conical. The third is what I assume you mean by "wide feathers". Both blind caps are threaded in the celluloid.

 

 

post-120091-0-57971800-1433948811_thumb.jpg

post-120091-0-04857500-1433948813_thumb.jpg

post-120091-0-40407800-1433948814_thumb.jpg

Baptiste knew how to make a short job long

For love of it. And yet not waste time either.

Robert Frost

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 1943 barrel have imprint MADE IN USA or MADE IN CANADA?

 

About lockdown with "rectangular" clip (first and like yours) vs "trapeze" clip (later) and blind cap threads directly on celluloid (first and like yours) vs blind cap with threaded metal inserted (later), here you've got a comparative images.

 

About lockdown blind caps:

 

http://s24.postimg.org/68ivcevdh/PARKER_LOCKDOWN_2_TYPES_BLIND_CAP_LAZARD.jpg

 

(If they are different, you can appear to be a soothsayer with a friend less informed :) about what vac lockdown is prior to another -without to see code date- just watching the blind cap )

 

About lockdown clips:

 

Standard model feather measures

http://s24.postimg.org/rgqktz5n9/PARKER_VACUMATIC_LOCKDOWN_CLIP_LAZARD.jpg

http://s15.postimg.org/twq8hnk6j/PARKER_VACUMATIC_LOCKDOWN_FIRST_CLIP_LAZARD.jpg

http://s8.postimg.org/5dm4r8vb9/PARKER_VACUMATIC_LOCKDOWN_2_TYPES_CLIP_2_LAZARD.jpg

You can read at the following link an approach to the dates on which these lockdown small changes arise:

 

https://www.fountainpennetwork.com/forum/index.php/topic/281078-vac-blind-cap-inserts-what-do-they-tell-us/page-1

Edited by Lazard 20
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 9 months later...

Is it possible this pen has the incorrect blind cap ?

I find it very odd that a new colour introduced 2 years after production of VF ,s ceased would be stamped with an Old model imprint. They were trying to sell Vacs so why would you offer a customer a brand new colour with an old model imprint?

Other possibilities - production error , prototype made earlier but with later alterations ie the blind cap

 

Keith

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43844
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      33563
    3. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    4. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      26747
    5. jar
      jar
      26101
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • Shanghai Knife Dude
      I have the Sailor Naginata and some fancy blade nibs coming after 2022 by a number of new workshop from China.  With all my respect, IMHO, they are all (bleep) in doing chinese characters.  Go use a bush, or at least a bush pen. 
    • A Smug Dill
      It is the reason why I'm so keen on the idea of a personal library — of pens, nibs, inks, paper products, etc. — and spent so much money, as well as time and effort, to “build” it for myself (because I can't simply remember everything, especially as I'm getting older fast) and my wife, so that we can “know”; and, instead of just disposing of what displeased us, or even just not good enough to be “given the time of day” against competition from >500 other pens and >500 other inks for our at
    • adamselene
      Agreed.  And I think it’s good to be aware of this early on and think about at the point of buying rather than rationalizing a purchase..
    • A Smug Dill
      Alas, one cannot know “good” without some idea of “bad” against which to contrast; and, as one of my former bosses (back when I was in my twenties) used to say, “on the scale of good to bad…”, it's a spectrum, not a dichotomy. Whereas subjectively acceptable (or tolerable) and unacceptable may well be a dichotomy to someone, and finding whether the threshold or cusp between them lies takes experiencing many degrees of less-than-ideal, especially if the decision is somehow influenced by factors o
    • adamselene
      I got my first real fountain pen on my 60th birthday and many hundreds of pens later I’ve often thought of what I should’ve known in the beginning. I have many pens, the majority of which have some objectionable feature. If they are too delicate, or can’t be posted, or they are too precious to face losing , still they are users, but only in very limited environments..  I have a big disliking for pens that have the cap jump into the air and fly off. I object to Pens that dry out, or leave blobs o
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...