Jump to content

Enough Interest In Mabie Todd, Swan Or Otherwise?


Recommended Posts

From the admin reply in another thread, it sounds like the dedicated subforums are really only for pen companies that still exist and still produce modern pens.

http://i.imgur.com/utQ9Ep9.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 157
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Cob

    53

  • Cepasaccus

    33

  • Greenie

    18

  • Goudy

    9

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

I think after all the "fuss" a simple British pens forum is sufficient. Being bi-continental MT does create an issue in this context. I doubt an MT forum would generate enough posting to be worthwhile.

That doesn't seem to bother anyone when including Parker and Waterman's does it? USA/Canada/GB/France...

 

Anyway despite its most honourable American Origins, Mabie Todd was in the end wholly British and certainly mainly British from about 1931.

 

Cob

Edited by Cob

fpn_1428963683__6s.jpg “The pen of the British Empire” fpn_1423349537__swan_sign_is.jpg


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh yes Goudy, I was watching it - and have bid...

 

Madness, but have got the other one for peanuts I suppose I might be able to splash out.

 

Cob

fpn_1428963683__6s.jpg “The pen of the British Empire” fpn_1423349537__swan_sign_is.jpg


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Funny. I almost bought that pen! Beautiful color. I was wondering how hard it would be to replace the clip when someone, apparentlt you, snatched it up. So, there is at least one more Swan afficionado who likes this pen even with the flaw.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's a very pretty pen; 58 is listed as Marine Bronze - a pattern that has escaped me: 57, 59, 63 and 64 yes but never 58!.

 

It's a shame about the nib: the nibs with the Swan around the breather hole are 1950s and the pen is early thirties. Being stamped H the nib might be quite firm. No-one has explained the significance of the letters. I once had a Blackbird nib stamped G which was delightful. I have seen D but not tried one. Still, it's not too difficult to find Swan 2 nibs.

 

As for the clip, I have done that job several times - but only once or twice on the pens that do not have the screw at the top of the pen - e.g. SF230. It's a fairly miserable fiddly pain in the neck.

 

Clips like that are not easily found and are expensive when they do turn up. You might want to send me a PM.

 

Incidentally today I received a Swan 100, possibly older than yours I think but I cannot be sure. Mine is stamped "The Swan Pen" on the barrel. The Swan appears on the cap and underneath him badly stamped, the number 100.

 

Cob

fpn_1428963683__6s.jpg “The pen of the British Empire” fpn_1423349537__swan_sign_is.jpg


Link to comment
Share on other sites

The letters usually (only?) appear on nibs with "14C-585" (for 58.5% gold content) written under the letter. G was used by Onoto to denote extra-flexible, as mentioned in some of their ads, and perhaps it meant the same for Mabie Todd. There's a theory that it means "Gregg shorthand" - but that seems odd on a pen for the UK market. Why not P for "Pitman"?

 

I did try to start a thread on this subject but it didn't get any answers.

http://i.imgur.com/utQ9Ep9.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a Swan 3H with the Swan around the breather which is pretty firm - that is, it is mildly flexible.

 

Your nib may be very nice to use

 

The letters usually (only?) appear on nibs with "14C-585" (for 58.5% gold content) written under the letter. G was used by Onoto to denote extra-flexible, as mentioned in some of their ads, and perhaps it meant the same for Mabie Todd. There's a theory that it means "Gregg shorthand" - but that seems odd on a pen for the UK market. Why not P for "Pitman"?

 

I did try to start a thread on this subject but it didn't get any answers.

I'm really sorry that your thread did not get taken up; it's a fascinating topic - and another reminder of how frustrating loss of records and data is.

 

Cob

fpn_1428963683__6s.jpg “The pen of the British Empire” fpn_1423349537__swan_sign_is.jpg


Link to comment
Share on other sites

I now see why my small gathering of ringtops has no MT - though I was trying at one time.

Thanks for sharing your photos.

The celluloids are gorgeous!

 

Thinking one reason for global forums is to connect the missing dots (and parts) of history. Post photos of frankenpens, detailing the necessary parts (by year/model) to make them whole?

 

With your interest this could be the root of "MT/S in UK" ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The harder the nib is, the more gold you get! :P

 

But don't think the nib is to hard. I like the swan on the nib.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When the pen gets to me I will be able to compare to the Swan 100. I do get the sinking feeling from this thread that I have made something of an error in going for this SM2/58. Oh well, it wouldn't be the first disaster that I have walked into, and I daresay it won't be the last. :rolleyes:

A SM2/58 is a pretty rare pen - and as we all agree here, very beautiful.

 

It is not the end of the world - far from it in fact - that provided that barrel and cap are in good condition, nice imprints etc., then that pen can be restored to pristine condition - and made to write as you want it to.

 

Once again I think that Mabie Todd had some of the most wonderful materials; of course as I said earlier I haven't a 58 sadly, but here are three together: 57 Blue-bronze, 59 Italian Marble and 63 Russet Jade.

 

Cob

 

fpn_1428570933__swan_57_59_63.jpg

Edited by Cob

fpn_1428963683__6s.jpg “The pen of the British Empire” fpn_1423349537__swan_sign_is.jpg


Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder why we can't buy pens with such wonderful colours today? Has the art of making the material been lost? Too expensive?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Colors like that are, I believe, only possible with celluloid. Celluloid is due to its flammability not a preferred material at the moment. I believe some Italian pen makers still work a bit with this material. The next best material is probably cellulose acetate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That doesn't seem to bother anyone when including Parker and Waterman's does it? USA/Canada/GB/France...

 

Anyway despite its most honourable American Origins, Mabie Todd was in the end wholly British and certainly mainly British from about 1931.

 

Cob

 

True, in that context it's not an issue. I've always thought of Mabie Todd as British despite it's origins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Either British or American (and Canadian), after reading about these pens on goodwriterspens.com, I'd love to see a separate forum too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For me it is a mixed company. I have N.Y. pens and England pens.

Quite so, it was. However, the assets were acquired by Mabie Todd & Co Ltd, London established in 1914. This company acquired all the assets in January 1916, the agreement having been concluded the previous month.

 

However the American company did continue and indeed I understand that all Mabie Todd nibs were manufactured in the USA up to 1931. It would seem that the American arm failed to prosper in the tough depression era in the USA.; the final incarnation of Mabie Todd USA was wound up in 1941.

 

Cob

Edited by Cob

fpn_1428963683__6s.jpg “The pen of the British Empire” fpn_1423349537__swan_sign_is.jpg


Link to comment
Share on other sites

I ma very pleased to have a really old Mabie Todd: in fact a Mabie Todd & Bard eye-dropper. It's delightful and in surprisingly good order. Mabie Todd & Bard ceased to exist in 1907, being replaced by Mabie Todd & Co. From what I have read I believe that my pen is one of the earliest Swans, made between 1889 and 1895. I writes really nicely and it does not leak, a testimony to the build quality to be found in Swans from the start, over 120 years ago.

 

Cob

 

fpn_1428960930__1.jpg

 

fpn_1428960947__3.jpg

fpn_1428963683__6s.jpg “The pen of the British Empire” fpn_1423349537__swan_sign_is.jpg


Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is said, that the Swan name was introduced 1895. So it should be later than that, perhaps "around 1900". To me it looks like a 3012 Pocket Pen. My Bard 3012 is capped 132 mm long and has a diameter of 8.7mm. It is a great writer! Unfortunately I do not trust the pen to be leak-proof. So I won't carry this Pocket Pen in my pocket. I have also a non-Bard 3012 with box and WWI medals from the pen owner.

 

Some photos of the Bard 3012 here:

http://www.penexchange.de/forum_neu/viewtopic.php?p=85706#p85706

http://www.penexchange.de/forum_neu/viewtopic.php?p=85875#p85875

http://www.penexchange.de/forum_neu/viewtopic.php?p=101200#p101200

 

I used it to sign at the notary once. :)

 

Cepasaccus, who didn't get the blue-bronze Blackbird today

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cepasaccus,

 

You MUST try harder and buy a BB 2/46

It is a Swan in almost every way. The quality and beauty is that of a Swan. Only the words on the section, feed, nib, clip make it a Blackbird. And mine has a wonderfully flexible nib as well.

 

fpn_1428979666__img_1533.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43844
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      33554
    3. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    4. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      26724
    5. jar
      jar
      26101
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • Shanghai Knife Dude
      I have the Sailor Naginata and some fancy blade nibs coming after 2022 by a number of new workshop from China.  With all my respect, IMHO, they are all (bleep) in doing chinese characters.  Go use a bush, or at least a bush pen. 
    • A Smug Dill
      It is the reason why I'm so keen on the idea of a personal library — of pens, nibs, inks, paper products, etc. — and spent so much money, as well as time and effort, to “build” it for myself (because I can't simply remember everything, especially as I'm getting older fast) and my wife, so that we can “know”; and, instead of just disposing of what displeased us, or even just not good enough to be “given the time of day” against competition from >500 other pens and >500 other inks for our at
    • adamselene
      Agreed.  And I think it’s good to be aware of this early on and think about at the point of buying rather than rationalizing a purchase..
    • A Smug Dill
      Alas, one cannot know “good” without some idea of “bad” against which to contrast; and, as one of my former bosses (back when I was in my twenties) used to say, “on the scale of good to bad…”, it's a spectrum, not a dichotomy. Whereas subjectively acceptable (or tolerable) and unacceptable may well be a dichotomy to someone, and finding whether the threshold or cusp between them lies takes experiencing many degrees of less-than-ideal, especially if the decision is somehow influenced by factors o
    • adamselene
      I got my first real fountain pen on my 60th birthday and many hundreds of pens later I’ve often thought of what I should’ve known in the beginning. I have many pens, the majority of which have some objectionable feature. If they are too delicate, or can’t be posted, or they are too precious to face losing , still they are users, but only in very limited environments..  I have a big disliking for pens that have the cap jump into the air and fly off. I object to Pens that dry out, or leave blobs o
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...