Jump to content
Classifieds is broken, please do not submit any new ads ×

Help Needed: Edison With 1,5 Stub Or 1,1 Custom Grind Ci?


Recommended Posts

Hello everybody!


I'm planing to buy a double ended pearl from Edison, one nib is going to be a full flex from Richard Binder and the second one is a problem ...


I know for sure, that I want a nib with line variation, but which one? For comparison I have only my Lamy nibs in 1,1 (which is just not broad enough for me and doesn't give the line variation I'd like), the 1,5 (which I like) and the 1,9 (which is my favorite).


As far as I read, most compare the Lamy nibs to stubs, right? So I'd be intrigued to have a cursive italic for comparison. But that would leave me with 1,1 which sounds small. 1,5 sound better, but that would be a stub again ...


Can anyone compare the line variations given by these two nibs? Which one gives more variation? Cause in the end that's more important to me (at least I think so) than the broadness.


Thanks for the input,


Edited by Antaria
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • jjlax10


  • Antaria


  • kbrede


Top Posters In This Topic

Bump :)


No one out there so fortunate to have both to compare? Already googled a lot but haven't come to any conclusion yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Franklin Christoph uses the same nibs as Edison, Jowo. I've got the F-C 1.1 and a broad CI ground by Masuyama. I would go with the Masuyama nib between the two I have. It lays down a .8 to .9 line, depending on which ink I'm using. The Masuyama has more line variation than the 1.1. The 1.1 and 1.5 don't have any tipping material. I don't have a Lamy 1.1 to compare with.


But it sounds like you're looking for wider than what I'm describing. If you're talking steel nibs they aren't that expensive. Buy the 1.1 and 1.5 and give them a try. :) They easily screw in an out of the pens.



Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you, Kent :)


Yeah, right now I'm a bit more for the 1.5 just because it's wider.


Getting both would be an option, too. Will have to calculate, if my budget can be streched so far (cause I really don't know how it could happen, that I bought an Parker vacumatic in the bay ... they are just so pretty).


Well, perhaps someone else can give an insight, too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The tip of these nibs are sharp like a CI, but the corners are rounded to give a smoother experience, and thus, you have a slight loss of line variation compared to the true CI. I think you will be pleased with the 1.5 because it does give a nice amount of variation, and there is no additional cost. If you later felt like you wanted a different nib, the same nibs are available for $15 without the feed and collar assemblies from Goulet or Anderson. You can get a 1.1, or a broad to be reground, but you will have a nib marked with the logo of these retailers.

President, Big Apple Pen Club

Follow us on Instagram @big_apple_pen_club


"Let other pens dwell on guilt and misery."


J.J. Lax Pen Co.

www.jjlaxpenco.comOn Instagram: @jjlaxpenco

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Create New...