Jump to content
Classifieds is broken, please do not submit any new ads ×

Mabie Todd Swan "safety Pen" Eyedropper: Can You Help With Information?


stephanos
 Share

Recommended Posts

I was given a rather lovely Swan pen yesterday, of a sort that (in my limited experience) I haven't seen before. So I would very much like to know more about it. This is a long post, but I'm putting as much detail in as I can to increase the chances that someone will be able to help. I didn't find anything on FPN that might help - but if I've missed something, please just point me in the right direction.

 

It looks like a good quality piece, and there are no leaks or cracks. An overnight soak of the nib revealed lots of gunk, and it needs further cleaning, but it is unblocked enough that water flows through. I guess it's pre-WWII, given that it's an eyedropper. But it has clearly been reasonably well looked after, so I doubt the nib is a replacement. It also seems likely that the box is original to the pen. Pictures follow, but I don't have a good camera with me, so please note the following details (all writing on the pen is in CAPS, and / indicates a new line):

 

* Cap: feels like solid metal, and is gold coloured (rolled gold?), with the Swan logo at the top of the clip. No finial 'jewel'. It's a screw-cap.

 

* Barrel: deep green - can read as black in poor light. No evidence of fading. Smells a bit funny - if I had to guess, I'd say it isn't plastic. Barrel imprint is slightly faded, but still reasonably crisp. It has the Swan logo with "trade mark" written underneath. The imprint says, "'Swan' Safety Pen / Mabie Todd & co. Ltd / Made in England"

 

* Section is black and has an imprint: "Swan"

 

* Nib appears to be fairly rigid - much less flexible than the thin Swan eyedropper (e.g.) and Blackbird lever-filler (e.g.) pens I have (EDIT for clarity. It's not a nail - you can get some line variation out of it, from what I can see when it is filled with water - but it differs markedly in feel from the other Mabie Todd pens I have tried). The nib seems to be a number 1: it is marked, "Swan / 1 / 14ct / Mabie Todd / & Co Ltd

 

* Feed is black, smells a little like the Noodler's pens and is marked "Swan". I haven't yet removed the nib and feed for cleaning.

 

The box is as shown in the first picture - pretty standard. The end of the box is marked "Safety" in black and "Fine" in red.

 

I'm including a picture of a bottom side of the box which quotes postage costs in both then-standard and imperial denominations, in case that helps to date it more exactly.

 

Finally, the pen came with an eyedropper in the box. The rubber feels a little old and slightly inflexible, but it works fine. I don't imagine it is original.

 

Pictures:

 

post-106543-0-63991100-1424294998_thumb.jpg

Entire ensemble

 

post-106543-0-81433200-1424295009_thumb.jpg

Pen: nib, barrel & cap

 

post-106543-0-36910500-1424295032_thumb.jpg

Nib close-up (to the extent that my camera does close-ups)

 

post-106543-0-49610000-1424295040_thumb.jpg

Finallly, instructions on exchanging nibs, including postage prices

Edited by stephanos
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 2
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • stephanos

    2

  • Cob

    1

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Yes Swan made these eye-dropper safety pens in the 1950s; similarly Macniven & Cameron produced an eye-dropper (manufactured in fact by Burnham) with the famous Waverley nib. I know that the Macniven and Cameron pen was manufactured for use in the Civil Service in the colonies since rubber sacs had a very short life in tropical conditions. I imagine that Mabie Todd made these eye-droppers for similar reasons.

 

I imagine that the rubber on the eye-dropper is original... You can buy new ones from Vintage Pens in the USA. The nib looks quite fine. Of course it should be removed and the feed thoroughly cleaned as the channels are likely to be partially clogged with dried very old ink.

 

Cob

Edited by Cob

fpn_1428963683__6s.jpg “The pen of the British Empire” fpn_1423349537__swan_sign_is.jpg


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you, Cob.

1950s is more in keeping with the style of the pen, and the reason for an eye-dropper makes a lot of sense. So 1950s seems quite plausible.

 

And oh yes, there was an enormous amount of gunk in the channels. Even after a thorough manual clean it's still putting out a line of dirty water: clearly a good candidate for the ultrasonic cleaner, when I get one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      37779
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      30899
    3. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    4. jar
      jar
      26101
    5. wimg
      wimg
      25595
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • Matthew TWP
      @Ruaidhri This was an absolutely wonderful bit of writing, and I hope that you're able to maintain the style once all of the medications are out of your system.  Take care and recover quickly!
    • Dr.X
      Very punny daniel
    • danielfalgerho
      These comments make me sad as I sympathise with Ruaidhri, having great difficulties in being taken seriously. Or being taken at all (no off-colors jokes, please!) In spite of overwhelming odds,  Ruaidhri -now I know how to spell it- made a courageous decision and stuck to it. I was diagnosed with a similar growth in a place I will not reveal. Oh, well, if you insist it was Mount Sinai Hospital. But I firmly intend to walk in Ruaidhri's footsteps, if he will let me, on my next visit to Dublin.
    • ParramattaPaul
      Reminds me of the day my associates and I developed a cure for all mankind's ills and mistakenly wrote it down with invisible ink.
    • AnneD
      Was that the end of the Laboratory? Somehow the exactitude created a fully destructive device, as always!
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Expiring Soon

    • By benbot517
      51 years and 11 months
    • By benbot517
      51 years and 11 months
    • By benbot517
      51 years and 11 months
    • By Okami
      51 years and 11 months
    • By Okami
      51 years and 11 months
  • Random Adverts

  • Files

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Armand K
      Armand K
      (39 years old)
    2. BKJ
      BKJ
      (61 years old)
    3. charleydido
      charleydido
      (76 years old)
    4. concord2000
      concord2000
      (69 years old)
    5. Denibird
      Denibird





×
×
  • Create New...