Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Rhodia seems to be very popular with fountain pen users, but my experience with it has been less than stellar. It makes even my Pelikans skip a bit, and my cheap Chinese pens don't get along with that paper at all. So why is Rhodia so popular with the fountain pen crowd? Are people using pens that don't skip on it (if so, which pens?), or is it that people like smooth paper so much that they are willing to overlook the fact that it induces skipping?
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 23
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Lady P

    6

  • Sham69

    2

  • brewsky

    2

  • c4bb0ose

    1

And I just realized I posted in a wrong forum: I should have posted in "Paper and Pen Paraphernalia" rather than "Paper and Pen Paraphernalia Reviews and Articles." :blush: If possible, can the mods please move this thread?
Link to post
Share on other sites

Because of it's comparative smoothness and lack of absorption it is a fairly featherproof ink. Also, none of my pens have skipped on Rhodia, perhaps your nibs need a little tweaking? I could see Rhodia being fussy with very dry nibs.

Edited by Tangster
Link to post
Share on other sites
It's possible that some of my nibs could use a bit of tweaking. It's just that those of my pens that pretty much never skip on rougher paper will skip a little bit on Rhodia, and those of my pens that don't skip much (but do skip a bit) on rougher paper skip like crazy on Rhodia.


I see the point about feathering though. I do indeed see very little feathering on Rhodia.
Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that your pens may be suffering from baby bottoms, since the paper doesn't have the tooth to reach the ink in your nib kerf. Of the papers out there ,Rhodia is very consistent and works with more paper/pen/ink combinations. I have not had any issues with Rhodia with any of my pens. Depending on your nibs, that may be the cause.

 

It's possible that some of my nibs could use a bit of tweaking. It's just that those of my pens that pretty much never skip on rougher paper will skip a little bit on Rhodia, and those of my pens that don't skip much (but do skip a bit) on rougher paper skip like crazy on Rhodia.
I see the point about feathering though. I do indeed see very little feathering on Rhodia.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rhodia is reasonably affordable and very consistent with very little feathering, so people have sort of standardized around it. I also don't like it, because the coating on it can cause issues (like skipping) with some pens, especially if it absorbs hand oils (like from a hand resting on the page as you write), and it can take a very long time to dry. I prefer Paperblanks and HP 32 lb for my nice papers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I think that your pens may be suffering from baby bottoms, since the paper doesn't have the tooth to reach the ink in your nib kerf. Of the papers out there ,Rhodia is very consistent and works with more paper/pen/ink combinations. I have not had any issues with Rhodia with any of my pens. Depending on your nibs, that may be the cause.

 

 

Could be the case with some of my pens. My newest Pelikan (an M400) works fine on copier paper, but skips quite a lot on Rhodia. (Actually, it'll write on Rhodia as well, but it forces me to apply a bit of pressure, which I find annoying because one of my favorite things about writing with fountain pens is that they allow me to write while applying very little pressure.) I doubt that my cheap Chinese pens have baby bottoms, though. Or at least my understanding was that it's the high end pens that tend to suffer from baby bottoms (due to the fact that manufacturers polish them so much in order to produce super-smooth nibs).
I need to buy a loupe! :gaah:
Link to post
Share on other sites

Rhodia is reasonably affordable and very consistent with very little feathering, so people have sort of standardized around it. I also don't like it, because the coating on it can cause issues (like skipping) with some pens, especially if it absorbs hand oils (like from a hand resting on the page as you write), and it can take a very long time to dry. I prefer Paperblanks and HP 32 lb for my nice papers.

 

Yeah, that's consistent with what I've seen.
I also like Paperblanks! My latest journal is by Paperblanks. I was a bit reluctant to get it because of the price, but I like the paper quality, so I think I might just stick with the brand. (Now if I can just stop myself from buying more pens...)
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have never had one issue with quality or durability in their notebooks. All of my pens perform exactly how I want them to on paper. I am a huge rhodia fanboy, and I own over 10 notebooks. I have not experienced any issues with oens skipping or performance (other then misalligned tines, which has nothing to do with the paper. .)

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

 

Could be the case with some of my pens. My newest Pelikan (an M400) works fine on copier paper, but skips quite a lot on Rhodia. (Actually, it'll write on Rhodia as well, but it forces me to apply a bit of pressure, which I find annoying because one of my favorite things about writing with fountain pens is that they allow me to write while applying very little pressure.) I doubt that my cheap Chinese pens have baby bottoms, though. Or at least my understanding was that it's the high end pens that tend to suffer from baby bottoms (due to the fact that manufacturers polish them so much in order to produce super-smooth nibs).

 

I need to buy a loupe! :gaah:

 

Look on amazon, I got my loupe very cheap and it works wonder for pen maintenance.

Edited by brewsky
Link to post
Share on other sites

So far, Rhodia works well with all of my favorite pens: Esterbrook, Lamy Safari and various Watermans. I like Rhodia mainly because the inks I use don't bleed or feather on it. Also, very smooth.

Regards,

 

Ray

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think their paper is that great, I imagine people who feel similarly wouldn't really mention that though unless there is a thread about it. But of course my main gripe is that the paper is really too yellow, and it does seem to work for many folks, so as with all things, another one of those personal preferences. Consistency is something to be appreciated though I feel, especially in this day and age.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Look on amazon, I got my loupe very cheap and it works wonder for pen maintenance.

 

I just ordered a loupe. Two in fact: a x10 and x30 one. I wasn't really sure what I needed, and they were under 4EUR each (including shipping), so I figured why not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

it really is my favourite paper.. i use to like clairefontaine but with my nibs made so perfectly smooth the clairfontaine is also very smooth and hard to control haha.

 

Rhodia is the best i have gone through over 50 large notebooks over the years i would say.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Realistically it is paper that performs way better than others I have access to in terms of price. If other paper comes across my wallet that is of equal or better performance and cost less, I would use that instead.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rhodia Webby's makes my even my wettest pens skip. Also, the paper is too yellow for my taste.

Other than that nice notebooks though. The 'perfect' notebook I have yet to discover.

"Le vase donne une forme au vide, et la musique au silence"

Georges Braque

Link to post
Share on other sites

i just like the regular 80 gram.. no need for 90gram at all or you doing something wrong. the 80 gram is white.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't like it for the same reasons others have already stated:

- color

- coating

- dry time

- sound my pens make on it

all of it I don't like. I rather live with some feathering (separates the fountain pens from the ballpoints :) )

Greetings,

Michael

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      37512
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      30209
    3. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    4. jar
      jar
      26101
    5. wimg
      wimg
      25570
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • A Smug Dill
      Even so, you'd end up with a fragmented list, and it becomes an O(N²) process for each prospective requestor to check what is available: effectively recreate the list of currently active servers (without any reliable up-to-date info upfront about the inks and number of samples on offer in the thread) from the sequential list of posts, which may be spread over two or even more pages, and then query each server independently to check what is currently on offer.   It comes down to not hav
    • LizEF
      If one wanted to do this, one could just use the "About Me" field which appears to be unlimited in size.  And if a bunch of people wanted to cooperate, the Member Title field (or signature) could be used to this end - "Ink Giver" (or some such) could be used by those with inks to give...  No software edits required.
    • Arkanabar
      I suppose the update issue could be mitigated.  One would post a link in signature, to the particular part of your profile where you list the inks that you're willing to post samples to others, gratis.  But looking at profiles, I suspect that would require an edit to the board's software, potentially a nontrivial task.
    • A Smug Dill
      I read your idea as getting willing givers to publicly register as members of a set of heterogenous servers, in a system in which a client would explicitly select an available server from a list, to which he/she will then send a request privately and asynchronously. Request handling in the system is unmanaged, and individual requests are handled by the targeted servers completely independently on each other. I think the model is fine, although there are some operational concerns you may want to
    • Daneaxe
      First thought on the method/system of ink sharing: Think the best way, to begin with, is to follow the way of the US thread: offer up a (small) list of inks you are willing to PIF, to whoever expresses interest. Write clearly in the "mission statement" how it works, with a tiny "quid pro quo" that even a struggling student can comply with, i.e. post your opinion and a writing sample, with option of a full review if desired.   So yours truly might say: "I'm offering up samples of D
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Expiring Soon

    • By benbot517
      51 years and 5 months
    • By benbot517
      51 years and 5 months
    • By benbot517
      51 years and 5 months
    • By Okami
      51 years and 5 months
    • By Okami
      51 years and 5 months
  • Random Adverts

  • Files

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Adrianc
      Adrianc
    2. alcecena
      alcecena
      (70 years old)
    3. cchan
      cchan
      (29 years old)
    4. ChelleW
      ChelleW
      (48 years old)
    5. CooperCarl
      CooperCarl
      (51 years old)





×
×
  • Create New...