Jump to content

Iron-Gall Ink And Bleach


josera

Recommended Posts

Hi!

 

I've had some troubles recently with the post, because due to the water, the address of some letters were out of the paper and they didin't reach their destination.

 

I bought some Iron-gall Ink to solve this problem: I bough Rohrer & Klinger Salix and Pelikan Blue-Black (Even officially it's not an iron-gall ink, I've read that it contains a little bit of touch or Iron-gall).

 

I have perform a couple of tests:

1. With water: The resistance of both inks against water is good in general. In comparison Royal Blue and Black from R&K was removed from the paper after some time.

2. With Bleach: I soak the pater test in Bleach, and after some times, all the inks were missed!

 

I thought that the iron-gallic inks were inviolable and permanents and thus resistants to Bleach.

 

Do you know if there any iron-gallic ink resistant to Bleach? Should I try nano-pigments or Noddlers inks?

 

Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 27
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • josera

    5

  • Bo Bo Olson

    2

  • thedeacon

    2

  • scrivelry

    2

Well, do not ....do not ....do not use bleach to clean pens even if they had iron gall in them. Use Vinegar 1-10 when water doesn't do the trick, which it will mostly if the pen is cleaned ever six weeks.

 

 

Guess you have to go to Noodler's Warden inks....they are bleach proof....and anything else proof.

In reference to P. T. Barnum; to advise for free is foolish, ........busybodies are ill liked by both factions.

 

 

The cheapest lessons are from those who learned expensive lessons. Ignorance is best for learning expensive lessons.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't use the bleack to clean pens. I've used the bleach to test the ink and to see their resistance to it.

 

Only Noodler's are "bullet proof"?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I chase shading inks, and have got to get the other half of the Euro 100, before I can think of English inks....much less Noodlers. I'm sure there are other Euro inks like Diamine Register and a couple of expensive permanent inks by DA.

ESSR (better, cheaper and more than Diamine register ink) is the iron gall ink, or R&K iron gall inks are the only inks I have that should be check proof.

 

We do bank transfers over here. I write perhaps two checks a year from here to the states, where I have a check taking bank, also. So bullet proof is not heavy in my needs.

I've learned to keep liquids far from my writing....being the pre-ball point generation more or less....and the black ink we used back in B&W TV was homework childproof out side their cloths.

 

It is good to have fun two toned shading inks, and vivid stoggy mono-tone bullet proof inks.

In reference to P. T. Barnum; to advise for free is foolish, ........busybodies are ill liked by both factions.

 

 

The cheapest lessons are from those who learned expensive lessons. Ignorance is best for learning expensive lessons.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the problem of bleach removing the ink from the paper is mostly a problem if you intend to bleach your writing.

 

Random water gets on anything - I do worry about addresses on envelopes myself - but random bleach just does not happen with the same frequency, in my experience.

 

Now, if there is something else you were concerned about removing the ink besides water and you tested with bleach because you thought the bleach was closer to whatever that was, there might still be some issue, but around here bleach does not happen willy-nilly the way good old "oops-just-spilled-my-seltzer/coffee/tea/soda/" does, so I personally see it as less of a problem.

 

T

 

T

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Scrivelry,

 

yes, I'm with you. Usually in your daily written you don't need to face against a risk of spilling bleach over your papers. Normally for 99 % of writtens it's more than enough with normal iron-gall ink (For example for the post).

 

But recently I've read something about Check Washing, that thiefs are able to remove the ink of the paper with some chemical products (Like Acetone). So my next question, for such application, which ink would be perfect and 100 % safer against all this chemicals? (Resistant against bleach, acetone, etc.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am new to the Fountain Pen Network, so I apologize if I am repeating information posted in the past re: iron gall inks. What I can share with you from my own experience (having learned something about Renaissance ink-making as a scholar of c16th English manuscript poetry, and having held many such manuscripts in my hands), is that no small measure of this ink's "permanency" is a function of the acids it contains (not only tannic acid from the oak galls themselves, but also from uric acid (yes...Shakespeare and his contemporaries would have mixed a bit of urine into the powdered galls)). This, in turn, eats into the paper's surface--sometimes a little, sometimes a lot. (I have turned the leaves of more than one Renaissance MS to see spots where the ink has actually burned through the page over time (and this was not cheap wood pulp paper--they used all-rag paper then)). So my suspicion is that iron gall ink is more durable in part b/c of the actual pigment, but also in part to the fact that it cuts into the paper a bit (maybe thereby also causing the pigment to infiltrate deeper layers of the paper?)--so you have nib carving into a soft surface and then dilute acids carrying the job on (even after the ink is dry).

Edited by Randwulfr

Pelikan 600 M • Pelikan 600 F • 1950s Pelikan 400 M flex

1950s Pelikan 400 OBB Pelikan 200 Binder 0.9mm Cursive Italic •

Pelikan 200 Binder 1.1mm Music • 1950s Pelikan 140 OBB

1950s Soennecken 309 OBB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Iron gall doesn't resist bleach. Rather, you can test for its presence in ink with bleach -- the dye component of the ink will disappear, and any iron will oxidize and leave a yellowish trace of rust on the paper:

fpn_1384714335__sam_1457_sm.jpg

 

BTW, when I tried this with Pelikan blue-black a year or two ago, I did get a faint iron trace.

fpn_1375035941__postcard_swap.png * * * "Don't neglect to write me several times from different places when you may."
-- John Purdue (1863)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am new to the Fountain Pen Network, so I apologize if I am repeating information posted in the past re: iron gall inks. What I can share with you from my own experience (having learned something about Renaissance ink-making as a scholar of c16th English manuscript poetry, and having held many such manuscripts in my hands), is that no small measure of this ink's "permanency" is a function of the acids it contains (not only tannic acid from the oak galls themselves, but also from uric acid (yes...Shakespeare and his contemporaries would have mixed a bit of urine into the powdered galls)). This, in turn, eats into the paper's surface--sometimes a little, sometimes a lot. (I have turned the leaves of more than one Renaissance MS to see spots where the ink has actually burned through the page over time (and this was not cheap wood pulp paper--they used all-rag paper then)). So my suspicion is that iron gall ink is more durable in part b/c of the actual pigment, but also in part to the fact that it cuts into the paper a bit (maybe thereby also causing the pigment to infiltrate deeper layers of the paper?)--so you have nib carving into a soft surface and then dilute acids carrying the job on (even after the ink is dry).

Historic formulations of iron-gall inks are different from contemporary formulations. Besides being more consistent and containing just enough acid to react with the iron, contemporary inks are made with HCl, which offgasses as the ink dries. Historically, sulphuric acid remained in the ink and continued to eat into the paper. That's why centuries-old paper contains holes where the ink lay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to ask, why are you so concerned about the effect of bleach on ink? If it is just curiosity, I understand. I just can't think of a scenario where it would be a major concern. Even when I did my undergrad work in chemistry and grad work for my MD, PhD I didn't worry this much about the effect of caustic substances. I just kept my written work out of the danger zone. I promise you can name any FP ink and I can come up with a substance that will effect it. It may destroy the paper, but it will effect the ink as well. :D Again, I'm just curious.

"If you laugh, you think, and you cry, that's a full day. That's a heck of a day. You do that seven days a week, you're going to have something special."-Jim Valvano

 

"Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if they made a difference in the world. But, the Marines don't have that problem."-Ronald Reagan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Noodler's Black is bleach-proof. If I remember correctly, a group of scientists were able to remove Noodler's Black with lasers of some sort, so he created the Warden's series that resisted that as well.

"While you are proclaiming peace with your lips, be careful to have it even more fully in your heart."

- St. Francis of Assisi

"Don't play what's there. Play what's not there."

-Miles Davis

I will gladly take your unwanted Noodler's pens. Don't throw them away.

 

Assume no affiliation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Iron-gall's main property is that it leaves tiny particles of black Iron III Oxide embedded in the matrix of what you are writing on. Because it is an oxide, it is chemically stable. However, bleach does fade the particles (whether it dissolves them, or changes the chemistry so the iron is no longer black, perhaps a current, practising inorganic chemist can enlighten us).

 

Neither bleach, nor any of the other 'normal' chemicals, will fade or remove the cellulose-reactive dye inks (Noodler's Bulletproof, PR Invincible, perhaps the new Mont Blanc permanent inks???) or the pigmented inks.

fpn_1412827311__pg_d_104def64.gif




“Them as can do has to do for them as can’t.


And someone has to speak up for them as has no voices.”


Granny Aching

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to ask, why are you so concerned about the effect of bleach on ink? If it is just curiosity, I understand. I just can't think of a scenario where it would be a major concern. Even when I did my undergrad work in chemistry and grad work for my MD, PhD I didn't worry this much about the effect of caustic substances. I just kept my written work out of the danger zone. I promise you can name any FP ink and I can come up with a substance that will effect it. It may destroy the paper, but it will effect the ink as well. :D Again, I'm just curious.

 

I was wondering just in case of "Check Washing". For 99,9 % of applications is more than enough with normal iron-gallic inks (Like water in the post, etc.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I was wondering just in case of "Check Washing". For 99,9 % of applications is more than enough with normal iron-gallic inks (Like water in the post, etc.)

Ahhhh, got it. I now remember reading that in another post, but I conveniently forgot. :wallbash: That makes perfect sense, just didn't think about it. I haven't written a check in so long it didn't click. I know many people still do, so it would be a concern. As others have suggested, some of the Noodler's inks are almost indestructible.

"If you laugh, you think, and you cry, that's a full day. That's a heck of a day. You do that seven days a week, you're going to have something special."-Jim Valvano

 

"Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if they made a difference in the world. But, the Marines don't have that problem."-Ronald Reagan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Scrivelry,

 

yes, I'm with you. Usually in your daily written you don't need to face against a risk of spilling bleach over your papers. Normally for 99 % of writtens it's more than enough with normal iron-gall ink (For example for the post).

 

But recently I've read something about Check Washing, that thiefs are able to remove the ink of the paper with some chemical products (Like Acetone). So my next question, for such application, which ink would be perfect and 100 % safer against all this chemicals? (Resistant against bleach, acetone, etc.)

Fascinating!

 

I had thought that crooks were concentrating on credit card theft, but who says there is only one kind of crook...

 

Yes, clearly one would want to make this as difficult as possible!

 

T

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Scrivelry,

 

yes, I'm with you. Usually in your daily written you don't need to face against a risk of spilling bleach over your papers. Normally for 99 % of writtens it's more than enough with normal iron-gall ink (For example for the post).

 

But recently I've read something about Check Washing, that thiefs are able to remove the ink of the paper with some chemical products (Like Acetone). So my next question, for such application, which ink would be perfect and 100 % safer against all this chemicals? (Resistant against bleach, acetone, etc.)

 

Your check company should use a paper that is designed to resist this. This isn't something to worry about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Iron-gall's main property is that it leaves tiny particles of black Iron III Oxide embedded in the matrix of what you are writing on. Because it is an oxide, it is chemically stable. However, bleach does fade the particles (whether it dissolves them, or changes the chemistry so the iron is no longer black, perhaps a current, practising inorganic chemist can enlighten us).

 

 

The iron gall pigment that forms on paper is most likely not just iron oxide. It most likely a iron complexed quinoid polymer. (See "Ageing of Laboratory Irongall inks Studied by Reflectance Spectrometry", Restaurator,1999 151-166.) Such a complex is expected to be strongly light absorbing and a dark brown. It is also known that quinoid polymers (e.g. melanin) are readily bleached.

 

Mark

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I seem to remember somewhere that pharmacist here on FPN did a test on his homebrew iron gall ink (the urkundentinte one) and if I'm remembering correctly, his did stand up to bleach.

 

If you're looking for forgery and bleach-proof, Noodler's Bad Blue Heron or their other Warden series inks should fit the bill.

Find my homemade ink recipes on my Flickr page here.

 

"I don't wait for inspiration; inspiration waits for me." --Akiane Kramarik

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43844
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      33494
    3. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    4. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      26624
    5. jar
      jar
      26101
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • Shanghai Knife Dude
      I have the Sailor Naginata and some fancy blade nibs coming after 2022 by a number of new workshop from China.  With all my respect, IMHO, they are all (bleep) in doing chinese characters.  Go use a bush, or at least a bush pen. 
    • A Smug Dill
      It is the reason why I'm so keen on the idea of a personal library — of pens, nibs, inks, paper products, etc. — and spent so much money, as well as time and effort, to “build” it for myself (because I can't simply remember everything, especially as I'm getting older fast) and my wife, so that we can “know”; and, instead of just disposing of what displeased us, or even just not good enough to be “given the time of day” against competition from >500 other pens and >500 other inks for our at
    • adamselene
      Agreed.  And I think it’s good to be aware of this early on and think about at the point of buying rather than rationalizing a purchase..
    • A Smug Dill
      Alas, one cannot know “good” without some idea of “bad” against which to contrast; and, as one of my former bosses (back when I was in my twenties) used to say, “on the scale of good to bad…”, it's a spectrum, not a dichotomy. Whereas subjectively acceptable (or tolerable) and unacceptable may well be a dichotomy to someone, and finding whether the threshold or cusp between them lies takes experiencing many degrees of less-than-ideal, especially if the decision is somehow influenced by factors o
    • adamselene
      I got my first real fountain pen on my 60th birthday and many hundreds of pens later I’ve often thought of what I should’ve known in the beginning. I have many pens, the majority of which have some objectionable feature. If they are too delicate, or can’t be posted, or they are too precious to face losing , still they are users, but only in very limited environments..  I have a big disliking for pens that have the cap jump into the air and fly off. I object to Pens that dry out, or leave blobs o
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...