Jump to content
Classifieds is broken, please do not submit any new ads ×

Question. Hero 616 Under The Hood, Same As The 51?


Cyclopentadiene
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

I've been wondering about the Hero 616. Does anyone know if the feed/collector system is the same for the 616 as that on the Parker 51?

 

Just curious is all...

 

Thanks,

Badger

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 9
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Flounder

    2

  • WayTooManyHobbies

    1

  • Seele

    1

  • Cyclopentadiene

    4

Top Posters In This Topic

From previous reading, neither the 616 nor the 100 are the same under the hood as a 51. They are somewhat similar, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The basic engineering and functional principles are very similar between the Parker 51, Hero 616, 100 and others, but parts are not cross-compatible. Despite what people say the Hero pens - and those by other makers - are not "clones" of the 51. In some ways, I think the 100 might even have a bit of an edge in engineering, but the proliferation of counterfeits do tend to skew people's perception somewhat.

No, I am not going to list my pens here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you search hard enough and are a bit lucky (try the FPN <only> Googler) I am pretty sure there are posts here with pics of real 51 and "Hero 51" innards in the same pics.

 

Bruce in Ocala, Fl

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The basic engineering and functional principles are very similar between the Parker 51, Hero 616, 100 and others, but parts are not cross-compatible. Despite what people say the Hero pens - and those by other makers - are not "clones" of the 51. In some ways, I think the 100 might even have a bit of an edge in engineering, but the proliferation of counterfeits do tend to skew people's perception somewhat.

 

I've heard that he Hero 100 might have an edge, but I can't think of why?

 

If you search hard enough and are a bit lucky (try the FPN <only> Googler) I am pretty sure there are posts here with pics of real 51 and "Hero 51" innards in the same pics.

 

Bruce in Ocala, Fl

 

Thanks bruce, as always brill info. I'll look it up soon :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 616 collector is made of out a softer material and fewer and shallower vanes. The profile of the hood is a little closer to Parker's 61 than the "51", too; the length/width of the collector is bound to be different.

 

On the 100's potential edge, I know that there's a special tool for disassembly that doesn't occur with the 51, but the filler spring is still a little weak by comparison (not FLIMSY like the 616, but still nothing like the "51"s).

Ravensmarch Pens & Books
It's mainly pens, just now....

Oh, good heavens. He's got a blog now, too.

 

fpn_1465330536__hwabutton.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's the same basic idea, but none of the parts are interchangable between the 51 and its closest homage, the larger 616 ("Jumbo" or "Doctor")

 

Here's a 616 jumbo collector. Same idea as a 51 aero collector, fat channel on one side, thin channel on the other, no spacer shim.

 

http://i773.photobucket.com/albums/yy19/flounder2009/Hero%20616%20Nib%20Alignment/th_Hero616nibalign6.jpg

 

Here's a 51 collector (ignore the arrow).

http://i773.photobucket.com/albums/yy19/flounder2009/Parker51%20Collector%20Cleaning/th_CleaningParker51Collectors007.jpg

 

The nib is similar to the 51 and fits in the same way. The feed is more similar to the thicker 51 feeds than the thinner ones. The 616 gets a breather tube, but this doesn't have the wee pressure equalising hole the breather tube on the aero 51 has.

 

http://i773.photobucket.com/albums/yy19/flounder2009/Hero%20616%20Nib%20Alignment/th_Hero616nibalign5.jpg

 

The hoods on the 616 jumbo and the aero 51 are pretty much the same size and shape. The internal threading is different.

 

http://i773.photobucket.com/albums/yy19/flounder2009/Gray%2051/51%20Aero%20Hood%20vs%20616%20Jumbo/th_51Hoodvs616Jumbo.jpg

 

Latest pen related post @ flounders-mindthots.blogspot.com : vintage Pilot Elite Pocket Pen review

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the responses folks!

I've seen your blog flounders and I'm considering having a go at the vac-conversion to a 616 when I finally get a few pennies saved up :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, cool! Post a photo if you get round to it. It was great "long way round" experience which came in handy servicing real vac units.

 

Will do. See y'all around. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      37955
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      31092
    3. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    4. jar
      jar
      26101
    5. wimg
      wimg
      25602
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • Splat
      Ah Ruaidhri ya wee heid banger, you do indeed have an Irishman’s way wid dose words now. I’ll be from outer Aberdeenshire up in the blizzard riven braes of the Grampians.  Amateur medicine and surgery is it? Well what noble aspirations you do possess, we need to encourage such noble experimentations.  I pondered on leaving my own battered shell to science, but, until I read your pearls of wisdom and lament, I had comedown on the side of leaving my body to Findus frozen foods.  However, your rema
    • austollie
      Hi Smug Dill,   Nice project.  If it were me, I'd cover stuff like: - nib types available, i.e. styles, materials (SS vs gold), flex vs nails; - filling systems (I love the "thingie" comment) and how once can use them in practice (e.g. fill cartridges with a syringe); - pen body materials and their consequences (pen not balanced of too heavy and big for the hand); - and, whilst you've made it clear that you do not like vintage pens, a discussion of these beyond "I d
    • A Smug Dill
      Thanks for your input! Yes, not putting wood in the list of body materials warranting a mention was an oversight. I love pens with wooden bodies, but my main concern, or chagrin, is that I have not come across a wooden-bodied pen with a wooden cap that seals well. Actually, there is one, but it isn't really wood per se: the Pilot Custom Kaede's maple body is resin impregnated. All other wooden pens I have can dry out while capped and undisturbed; that includes several Platinum #3776 models.
    • amk
      That looks pretty good. You might want to add wood as a material (with its weakness of staining) and mention urushi. And under ergonomic considerations, the size of section (slender pens vs chunky pens), and shape of section, and 'disturbances' such as the Lamy 2000 'ears' and Pilot Capless clip getting in the way might be worth mentioning. Also possibly a general section on things you can do yourself with a bit of care, with a bit of practice, and things that are strictly "don't try this a
    • Detman101
      Hahaha...this is brilliantly funny! 🤣 I did not know about this section of the site...what gem!  
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Aramilxiloscient
      Aramilxiloscient
      (32 years old)
    2. bartonflyer
      bartonflyer
      (71 years old)
    3. bluewatermark
      bluewatermark
      (48 years old)
    4. Bob_
      Bob_
      (71 years old)
    5. Bonnie Prince Shuggie
      Bonnie Prince Shuggie
      (74 years old)





×
×
  • Create New...