Jump to content

Yes Or No To A Quill


AncientWriterAlex

Recommended Posts

I did, probably 25 years ago. I also cut reed pens. In my opinion, you're all wet. Having the plume (if one leaves part of the vane on the shaft) waving around in the field of vision is an unnecessary distraction. As I hold the quill conventionally and don't try to use it as if it were a ball point pen, I don't have any problem with part of the shaft contacting my index finger. (BTW, the business about fletching is just another red herring, just like the shoulder writing nonsense. It's not relevant.)

The right wing quill curves to the left and down, away from your hand. It obscures nothing and is not distracting. You have never had a quill in your hand, have you?

Can a calculator understand a cash register?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 29
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Mickey

    10

  • Paddler

    8

  • brunico

    2

  • AncientWriterAlex

    2

The right wing quill curves to the left and down, away from your hand. It obscures nothing and is not distracting. You have never had a quill in your hand, have you?

You bet I have. Have you ever seen a feather still attached to a wing? Look, you have your opinion and I have the opinion of several experts and my own experience. So far, you've only offered your personal taste, "Chacun son goût."

 

http://wiesenfeuer.ansteorra.org/links/artsandsciences/useofquillpensbyisaacbane.pdf

 

This is the second source I've offered. Notice the caption on figure 10 "figuring out the curve of the quill." Please note the direction in which the quill curves: back over the hand. Please, if you have an expert source suggesting the quill should curve away from the hand, please post it. I'm always willing to learn something.

The liberty of the press is indeed essential to the nature of a free state; but this consists in laying no previous restraints upon publications, and not in freedom from censure for criminal matter when published. Every freeman has an undoubted right to lay what sentiments he pleases before the public; to forbid this, is to destroy the freedom of the press; but if he publishes what is improper, mischievous or illegal, he must take the consequence of his own temerity. (4 Bl. Com. 151, 152.) Blackstone's Commentaries

Link to comment
Share on other sites

An excellent resource for calligraphy and illumination is Edward Johnston's book -

Writing & Illuminating & Lettering first published in 1906 and reprinted several times since. My copy, a paperback edition, is copyright 1978.

 

it gives detailed instructions and with diagrams, if I recall correctly for cutting quills. The person who spoke about baking the quills in hot sand was in fact speeding up the natural drying out/seasoning process. Again, this process has to be done for the quill to be effective. There is also a "secret" way to create an artificial ink reservoir inside the stalk of the quill and eliminate the need for constant dipping of the quill every few letters.

 

I believe I may still have some old turkey quills from when I was doing the cutting and writing quite a while ago. If you are interested, I will do some digging to determine if they are available and usable. If they are, I would be happy to send them to you. As you are in the U.K. the only cost might be the postage.

 

Please let me know if you would like me to "start digging".

 

also, as for the book, my copy says that it was published simultaneously in the U.S. under agreement with:

Pitman Publishing Limited

19 Parker Street

London, WC2B 5PB

 

Personally, I am unaware or which side, or where on the bird the quills come from. I just know they: worked well, were fun to learn to cut and use and I also have no idea about writing from the shoulder or the hip or underhand. I just did it.

 

Feel free to PM me with additional issues, etc.

“Don't put off till tomorrow what you can do today, because if you do it today and like it, you can do again tomorrow!”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

An excellent resource for calligraphy and illumination is Edward Johnston's book -

Writing & Illuminating & Lettering first published in 1906 and reprinted several times since. My copy, a paperback edition, is copyright 1978.

 

it gives detailed instructions and with diagrams, if I recall correctly for cutting quills. The person who spoke about baking the quills in hot sand was in fact speeding up the natural drying out/seasoning process. Again, this process has to be done for the quill to be effective. There is also a "secret" way to create an artificial ink reservoir inside the stalk of the quill and eliminate the need for constant dipping of the quill every few letters.

 

I believe I may still have some old turkey quills from when I was doing the cutting and writing quite a while ago. If you are interested, I will do some digging to determine if they are available and usable. If they are, I would be happy to send them to you. As you are in the U.K. the only cost might be the postage.

 

Please let me know if you would like me to "start digging".

 

also, as for the book, my copy says that it was published simultaneously in the U.S. under agreement with:

Pitman Publishing Limited

19 Parker Street

London, WC2B 5PB

 

Personally, I am unaware or which side, or where on the bird the quills come from. I just know they: worked well, were fun to learn to cut and use and I also have no idea about writing from the shoulder or the hip or underhand. I just did it.

 

Feel free to PM me with additional issues, etc.

Thanks for the hint. I bought my copy of WIL in 1981 or 1982, probably the same edition as your copy. It's an excellent practical reference and it was probably that book that got me interested in calligraphy. (I was at the time more interested in book binding.)

The liberty of the press is indeed essential to the nature of a free state; but this consists in laying no previous restraints upon publications, and not in freedom from censure for criminal matter when published. Every freeman has an undoubted right to lay what sentiments he pleases before the public; to forbid this, is to destroy the freedom of the press; but if he publishes what is improper, mischievous or illegal, he must take the consequence of his own temerity. (4 Bl. Com. 151, 152.) Blackstone's Commentaries

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You bet I have. Have you ever seen a feather still attached to a wing? Look, you have your opinion and I have the opinion of several experts and my own experience. So far, you've only offered your personal taste, "Chacun son goût."

 

http://wiesenfeuer.ansteorra.org/links/artsandsciences/useofquillpensbyisaacbane.pdf

 

This is the second source I've offered. Notice the caption on figure 10 "figuring out the curve of the quill." Please note the direction in which the quill curves: back over the hand. Please, if you have an expert source suggesting the quill should curve away from the hand, please post it. I'm always willing to learn something.

I have looked at feathers still attached to the wing. If you look at the back of the bird, with the bird facing away from you, stretch out the right wing. The feathers will extend down and to the left - just the way a right handed writer needs it. The Canada goose and the wild turkey both grow their feathers this way, at least during hunting season in my part of the world. I think you are a crummy kid out for a troll.

Can a calculator understand a cash register?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You might consult Ken, Salman, or any number of folks in the Penmanship sub-forum. I believe they will inform you that you are exactly as incorrect thinking me a youthful troll as you are about feathers. As for me being crummy: at the moment, that's true. I just ate a rice cake without a napkin.

The liberty of the press is indeed essential to the nature of a free state; but this consists in laying no previous restraints upon publications, and not in freedom from censure for criminal matter when published. Every freeman has an undoubted right to lay what sentiments he pleases before the public; to forbid this, is to destroy the freedom of the press; but if he publishes what is improper, mischievous or illegal, he must take the consequence of his own temerity. (4 Bl. Com. 151, 152.) Blackstone's Commentaries

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had a quill -- feather and all -- when I was a child. I enjoyed using it at the time. However, since my writing tastes have changed and I now prefer heavy pens, using a quill is no longer an option.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Anyone interested in watching an expert (and a rather charming one) cut a quill should go to

 

 

It's brief and very much to the point.

The liberty of the press is indeed essential to the nature of a free state; but this consists in laying no previous restraints upon publications, and not in freedom from censure for criminal matter when published. Every freeman has an undoubted right to lay what sentiments he pleases before the public; to forbid this, is to destroy the freedom of the press; but if he publishes what is improper, mischievous or illegal, he must take the consequence of his own temerity. (4 Bl. Com. 151, 152.) Blackstone's Commentaries

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good video.

One aspect of nib cutting that you seldom see mentioned is that you don't actually need to make a slit in the nib. If you don't need the flexibility provided by the slit, you can score the nib, top and bottom surfaces, with the back side of the knife point, just where the slit would normally be. The score lines will conduct ink to the point. The advantage is a more durable nib and one that doesn't require a very light touch.

Can a calculator understand a cash register?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good video.

One aspect of nib cutting that you seldom see mentioned is that you don't actually need to make a slit in the nib. If you don't need the flexibility provided by the slit, you can score the nib, top and bottom surfaces, with the back side of the knife point, just where the slit would normally be. The score lines will conduct ink to the point. The advantage is a more durable nib and one that doesn't require a very light touch.

Yes, good point. (I heard the same advice in another video.) It only makes sense. You don't need a slit unless you're doing round hand or one its kin, like Spencerian, which was developed with quills.

The liberty of the press is indeed essential to the nature of a free state; but this consists in laying no previous restraints upon publications, and not in freedom from censure for criminal matter when published. Every freeman has an undoubted right to lay what sentiments he pleases before the public; to forbid this, is to destroy the freedom of the press; but if he publishes what is improper, mischievous or illegal, he must take the consequence of his own temerity. (4 Bl. Com. 151, 152.) Blackstone's Commentaries

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43844
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      33580
    3. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    4. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      26770
    5. jar
      jar
      26105
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • Shanghai Knife Dude
      I have the Sailor Naginata and some fancy blade nibs coming after 2022 by a number of new workshop from China.  With all my respect, IMHO, they are all (bleep) in doing chinese characters.  Go use a bush, or at least a bush pen. 
    • A Smug Dill
      It is the reason why I'm so keen on the idea of a personal library — of pens, nibs, inks, paper products, etc. — and spent so much money, as well as time and effort, to “build” it for myself (because I can't simply remember everything, especially as I'm getting older fast) and my wife, so that we can “know”; and, instead of just disposing of what displeased us, or even just not good enough to be “given the time of day” against competition from >500 other pens and >500 other inks for our at
    • adamselene
      Agreed.  And I think it’s good to be aware of this early on and think about at the point of buying rather than rationalizing a purchase..
    • A Smug Dill
      Alas, one cannot know “good” without some idea of “bad” against which to contrast; and, as one of my former bosses (back when I was in my twenties) used to say, “on the scale of good to bad…”, it's a spectrum, not a dichotomy. Whereas subjectively acceptable (or tolerable) and unacceptable may well be a dichotomy to someone, and finding whether the threshold or cusp between them lies takes experiencing many degrees of less-than-ideal, especially if the decision is somehow influenced by factors o
    • adamselene
      I got my first real fountain pen on my 60th birthday and many hundreds of pens later I’ve often thought of what I should’ve known in the beginning. I have many pens, the majority of which have some objectionable feature. If they are too delicate, or can’t be posted, or they are too precious to face losing , still they are users, but only in very limited environments..  I have a big disliking for pens that have the cap jump into the air and fly off. I object to Pens that dry out, or leave blobs o
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...