Jump to content

Fountain Pen Sac Size Guide For Repairers


Richard

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 43
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Richard

    7

  • Ron Z

    3

  • professionaldilettante

    3

  • kirchh

    2

Not sure you really mean "dearth"...

--Daniel

"The greatest mental derangement is to believe things because we want them to be true, not because we observe that they are in effect." --Jacques-Bénigne Bossuet

Daniel Kirchheimer
Specialty Pen Restoration
Authorized Sheaffer/Parker/Waterman Vintage Repair Center
Purveyor of the iCroScope digital loupe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure you really mean "dearth"...

Dave Guard (banjo player and resident humorist for the Kingston Trio) once remarked during a concert at the Hungry I that the Trio would play the next tune in response to a diminishing number of requests. I always liked Guard.

sig.jpg.2d63a57b2eed52a0310c0428310c3731.jpg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would It be possible to include a table of sac dimensions for those of us who are into tinkering?

Please be more specific — I don't understand what you're asking for.

sig.jpg.2d63a57b2eed52a0310c0428310c3731.jpg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Richard!

 

Thanks for the resource - as timing would have it, I'm gearing up to do my first re-sacs. 3 are very straight-forward (Estie J/SJ), but one is a Sheaffer Touchdown Tuckaway. I believe it to be a #17 sac, the info of which I seem to recall I got on David Nishimura's site. I don't see it in your Sheaffer table - do you concur with that sac size?

 

Cheers,

Jon

Edited by JonSzanto

"When Men differ in Opinion, both Sides ought equally to have the Advantage of being heard by the Publick; and that when Truth and Error have fair Play, the former is always an overmatch for the latter."

~ Benjamin Franklin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would It be possible to include a table of sac dimensions for those of us who are into tinkering?

Please be more specific — I don't understand what you're asking for.

I wanted to stick a sac over the mating end of a halved Sailor cartridge to increase ink capacity, and I wasn't sure of what size sac I'd need.

The heart has its reasons which reason knows nothing of.

Blaise Pascal

fpn_1336709688__pen_01.jpg

Tell me about any of your new pens and help with fountain pen quality control research!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure you really mean "dearth"...

Dave Guard (banjo player and resident humorist for the Kingston Trio) once remarked during a concert at the Hungry I that the Trio would play the next tune in response to a diminishing number of requests. I always liked Guard.

From the responses so far, it seems reports of its dearth have been greatly exaggerated...

 

--Daniel

Edited by kirchh

"The greatest mental derangement is to believe things because we want them to be true, not because we observe that they are in effect." --Jacques-Bénigne Bossuet

Daniel Kirchheimer
Specialty Pen Restoration
Authorized Sheaffer/Parker/Waterman Vintage Repair Center
Purveyor of the iCroScope digital loupe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is the sac size number for short pens like Waterman 452 1/2? Is it the same as 45 1/2 and trim it?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

… one is a Sheaffer Touchdown Tuckaway. I believe it to be a #17 sac, the info of which I seem to recall I got on David Nishimura's site. I don't see it in your Sheaffer table - do you concur with that sac size?

It should be a 171/2x17/16 N. Since that size isn't available, you can use a 17. But a better choice would be a 171/2x111/16 N, cut to length. It won't be necked, but it will still hold if shellacked properly. The advantage of using the slightly larger diameter is that the pen won't hork up so much ink when you pull the plunger out because the sac won't have as much room to expand under the partial vacuum. All this technical stuff — fun, huh? :)

sig.jpg.2d63a57b2eed52a0310c0428310c3731.jpg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is the sac size number for short pens like Waterman 452 1/2? Is it the same as 45 1/2 and trim it?

The 4521/2 is a full-length pen, not a short pen. It has the same internal diameter as the 521/2, and it uses the same sac. (The 4 in its number refers to the sterling overlay, and that goes on over a standard-size barrel.) The 4521/2V is the short version, and it uses the same sac. As for trimming, all straight sacs need to be trimmed to fit the pen; there are instructions here. And there is an explanation of Waterman's Standard Numbering System here.

Edited by Richard

sig.jpg.2d63a57b2eed52a0310c0428310c3731.jpg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It should be a 171/2x17/16 N. Since that size isn't available, you can use a 17. But a better choice would be a 171/2x111/16 N, cut to length. It won't be necked, but it will still hold if shellacked properly. The advantage of using the slightly larger diameter is that the pen won't hork up so much ink when you pull the plunger out because the sac won't have as much room to expand under the partial vacuum.

Xlnt, just the kind of stuff I needed to know.

 

All this technical stuff — fun, huh? :)

Well, basically... yikes! Except that I'm drawing the line at the re-sacing - anything beyond this goes to a professional,

"When Men differ in Opinion, both Sides ought equally to have the Advantage of being heard by the Publick; and that when Truth and Error have fair Play, the former is always an overmatch for the latter."

~ Benjamin Franklin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wanted to stick a sac over the mating end of a halved Sailor cartridge to increase ink capacity, and I wasn't sure of what size sac I'd need.

The dimension you need is simply the outside diameter. It's the sac number times 1/64". Thus, a Nº 16 sac is 16/64" in diameter. That's 1/4", or 6.35 mm. For your purposes, the stretch in putting this sac over a 1/4" tube would do the job nicely. Adjust the sac size to the diameter you need.

sig.jpg.2d63a57b2eed52a0310c0428310c3731.jpg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could Conway Stewart be added to the list at some point please? I have a couple of 58's and aren't sure of their sac size.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just can't help myself...

 

sack size isn't eveything :headsmack:

 

 

Puss

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wanted to stick a sac over the mating end of a halved Sailor cartridge to increase ink capacity, and I wasn't sure of what size sac I'd need.

The dimension you need is simply the outside diameter. It's the sac number times 1/64". Thus, a Nº 16 sac is 16/64" in diameter. That's 1/4", or 6.35 mm. For your purposes, the stretch in putting this sac over a 1/4" tube would do the job nicely. Adjust the sac size to the diameter you need.

Thank You! This is just what I've been looking for.

The heart has its reasons which reason knows nothing of.

Blaise Pascal

fpn_1336709688__pen_01.jpg

Tell me about any of your new pens and help with fountain pen quality control research!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43844
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      33553
    3. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    4. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      26724
    5. jar
      jar
      26101
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • Shanghai Knife Dude
      I have the Sailor Naginata and some fancy blade nibs coming after 2022 by a number of new workshop from China.  With all my respect, IMHO, they are all (bleep) in doing chinese characters.  Go use a bush, or at least a bush pen. 
    • A Smug Dill
      It is the reason why I'm so keen on the idea of a personal library — of pens, nibs, inks, paper products, etc. — and spent so much money, as well as time and effort, to “build” it for myself (because I can't simply remember everything, especially as I'm getting older fast) and my wife, so that we can “know”; and, instead of just disposing of what displeased us, or even just not good enough to be “given the time of day” against competition from >500 other pens and >500 other inks for our at
    • adamselene
      Agreed.  And I think it’s good to be aware of this early on and think about at the point of buying rather than rationalizing a purchase..
    • A Smug Dill
      Alas, one cannot know “good” without some idea of “bad” against which to contrast; and, as one of my former bosses (back when I was in my twenties) used to say, “on the scale of good to bad…”, it's a spectrum, not a dichotomy. Whereas subjectively acceptable (or tolerable) and unacceptable may well be a dichotomy to someone, and finding whether the threshold or cusp between them lies takes experiencing many degrees of less-than-ideal, especially if the decision is somehow influenced by factors o
    • adamselene
      I got my first real fountain pen on my 60th birthday and many hundreds of pens later I’ve often thought of what I should’ve known in the beginning. I have many pens, the majority of which have some objectionable feature. If they are too delicate, or can’t be posted, or they are too precious to face losing , still they are users, but only in very limited environments..  I have a big disliking for pens that have the cap jump into the air and fly off. I object to Pens that dry out, or leave blobs o
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...