Jump to content

A History Of Pelikan (link)


Bill D

Recommended Posts

  • 11 months later...
  • Replies 36
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • stoen

    4

  • joss

    2

  • Manofadventure

    2

  • Penne Stilografiche

    2

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Hi. Can Anyone direct me towards a page on Universal Cartridge Pens. Obtained a lot of Pelikan Long and Standard Cartridges, but they get cracked in My Jinhaos :wallbash:...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Hello, as of 6/27/2019 the link is dead. Any other active link? I am eager to read!

Javier

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

I must be rather foggy on this but I recall the rights and branding being purchased from De La Rue Pelican pens in order for Pelikan to enter the pen market, is this correct?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...
On 6/27/2019 at 9:47 PM, arellano81366 said:

Hello, as of 6/27/2019 the link is dead. Any other active link? I am eager to read!

 

4 hours ago, stoen said:

 

Ten years may be much in terms of Internet time. Please be so kind to update the broken link for the sake of those eager to read, enjoy & learn, and eventually contribute...

 

Thanks in advance!

 

You can try these links :-

http://www.ruettinger-web.de/e_index.html

https://thepelikansperch.com/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi,

I would also like to add this page with a rather comprehensive history of Pelikan 100:

https://www.pelikan-collectibles.com/en/Pelikan/Models/index.html

 

also with menu links to other historical models (100N, Ibis, Rappen...).

 

Yet, all the sites are somewhat inconclusive in terms of my efforts to determine the age of my 100N:

 

-black binde

-celluloid cap tube

-gold plated fluted clip and cap ring

-dark yellow celluloid barrel

-new logo on cap top

 

At some point the original nib must have been replaced with a Model 400 nib.

 

If someone could point me to a place with more detailed information to share, I’d be very grateful.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/26/2020 at 1:59 AM, stoen said:

 

Ten years may be much in terms of Internet time. Please be so kind to update the broken link for the sake of those eager to read, enjoy & learn, and eventually contribute...

 

Thanks in advance!

 

It is not an update of the broken link but if I remember correctly, these are the links to the same text on the Pelikan history written by Rick Propas:

Part I: http://newpentrace.net/penbase/Data_Returns/full_article06cb.html?id=368

Part II: http://newpentrace.net/penbase/Data_Returns/full_article3887.html?id=372

Part III: http://newpentrace.net/penbase/Data_Returns/full_articleaf7f.html?id=380

Part IV: http://newpentrace.net/penbase/Data_Returns/full_articlefb87.html?id=383

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, stoen said:

Yet, all the sites are somewhat inconclusive in terms of my efforts to determine the age of my 100N:

 

I guess that there are people here at FPN that can be of help in this matter, if you can share a few pictures showing the details of your pen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/25/2020 at 5:59 PM, stoen said:

 

Ten years may be much in terms of Internet time. Please be so kind to update the broken link for the sake of those eager to read, enjoy & learn, and eventually contribute...

 

Thanks in advance!

 

Courtesy of the Wayback Machine, the page as it appeared in June, 2011: http://web.archive.org/web/20110606225017/https://www.thepenguinpen.com/pelikan/pelikan_history.jsp

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, joss said:

 

I guess that there are people here at FPN that can be of help in this matter, if you can share a few pictures showing the details of your pen.

Thanks. The details are just as already said:

- deep yellow celluloid barrel

- celluloid cap tube

- gold plated fluted cap ring

- gold plated fluted clip

- black binde

- post 1938 logo on cap tube (aka “two chick logo”).

 

Cap top and blind cap are ebonite. The pen writes and posts nicely. I know that such a series has been batch-produced for the Taylorix company in the end of thirties, but this one has no Taylorix logo on the sleeve.

 

The nib is not original. It is post-1953 made and belongs to a 400-series pen (aka “fir tree”), although its dimensions are exactly the same as a 100N nib. Feed and collar are original 100N.

 

All the relevant details are shown in the picture:

 

8E6CED45-F32C-46DF-AD99-D4482B5F2A05.jpeg.65ecfc6013ed5cfdc9bce1d320edb868.jpeg

 

Thanks for any relevant info.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, stoen said:

Thanks. The details are just as already said:

- deep yellow celluloid barrel

- celluloid cap tube

- gold plated fluted cap ring

- gold plated fluted clip

- black binde

- post 1938 logo on cap tube (aka “two chick logo”).

 

Cap top and blind cap are ebonite. The pen writes and posts nicely. I know that such a series has been batch-produced for the Taylorix company in the end of thirties, but this one has no Taylorix logo on the sleeve.

 

The nib is not original. It is post-1953 made and belongs to a 400-series pen (aka “fir tree”), although its dimensions are exactly the same as a 100N nib. Feed and collar are original 100N.

 

All the relevant details are shown in the picture:

 

8E6CED45-F32C-46DF-AD99-D4482B5F2A05.jpeg.65ecfc6013ed5cfdc9bce1d320edb868.jpeg

 

Thanks for any relevant info.

 

Ok...

 

Your pen has a pre-1940 body/barrel as Pelikan moved to green injection molded acrylic for the barrels during that year.

 

What kind of a piston seal does it have? The move to black elastomer piston seals took place at the end of October 1942 and those were in turn switched to clear elastomer piston seals used in the 400 etc. near the end of the production run for the 100N due to the earlier ones shrinking. If it has a plastic seal it is a later replacement.

 

Those caps with ridged or fluted cap rings were available from 1938 onwards (the same year as the logo was changed).

 

So, a 100N manufactured between 1938-1940 with a nib that has been swapped to the model that was introduced in December of 1954? Those nibs were also used in 100N manufactured after that date.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, mana said:

What kind of a piston seal does it have?

It is a cork-sealed piston.

So my question is answered.

😊

Looks it might have been assembled by 1939 or early 1940 most likely. The original nib could have been a PD or a 585, perhaps even a CN. It might have been swapped for a “fir tree nib” near the end of 100N production run, or even later. The collar however is original pre-war, without nib tool notches, and the feed has a recessed middle fin. All in all, it is an elegant looking and well behaving pen, first one of this particular build I’ve come across. Maybe I’ll re-install a pre-war nib one day.

 

Is there a reference text on “fluted” clips and cap tube rings somewhere else than in the aforementioned Rick Propas text? I haven’t found any so far.

 

Thanks for helping solve this puzzle!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...
  • 1 year later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43844
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      33583
    3. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    4. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      26772
    5. jar
      jar
      26105
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • Shanghai Knife Dude
      I have the Sailor Naginata and some fancy blade nibs coming after 2022 by a number of new workshop from China.  With all my respect, IMHO, they are all (bleep) in doing chinese characters.  Go use a bush, or at least a bush pen. 
    • A Smug Dill
      It is the reason why I'm so keen on the idea of a personal library — of pens, nibs, inks, paper products, etc. — and spent so much money, as well as time and effort, to “build” it for myself (because I can't simply remember everything, especially as I'm getting older fast) and my wife, so that we can “know”; and, instead of just disposing of what displeased us, or even just not good enough to be “given the time of day” against competition from >500 other pens and >500 other inks for our at
    • adamselene
      Agreed.  And I think it’s good to be aware of this early on and think about at the point of buying rather than rationalizing a purchase..
    • A Smug Dill
      Alas, one cannot know “good” without some idea of “bad” against which to contrast; and, as one of my former bosses (back when I was in my twenties) used to say, “on the scale of good to bad…”, it's a spectrum, not a dichotomy. Whereas subjectively acceptable (or tolerable) and unacceptable may well be a dichotomy to someone, and finding whether the threshold or cusp between them lies takes experiencing many degrees of less-than-ideal, especially if the decision is somehow influenced by factors o
    • adamselene
      I got my first real fountain pen on my 60th birthday and many hundreds of pens later I’ve often thought of what I should’ve known in the beginning. I have many pens, the majority of which have some objectionable feature. If they are too delicate, or can’t be posted, or they are too precious to face losing , still they are users, but only in very limited environments..  I have a big disliking for pens that have the cap jump into the air and fly off. I object to Pens that dry out, or leave blobs o
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...