Jump to content

Dating Montblanc 149s


DKbRS

Recommended Posts

On 10/4/2010 at 11:57 PM, hari317 said:

Excellent chart David, once completed it will be an excellent resource. Under barrels you might want to add celluloid for the 50's decade. Early to mid 60's early plastic barrel's filling system was press fit filler with higher ink capacity.

This thread is such a great resource, especially the chart created by @DKbRS.

 

This information might be buried in here somewhere, but can someone tell me:

1.  What year the 149's made the transition from celluloid to resin?

2.  What year the 149's two thin cap rings transitioned from sterling silver to gold?

 

Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 649
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • zaddick

    56

  • Barry Gabay

    31

  • hari317

    26

  • niksch

    21

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

On 10/4/2010 at 11:57 PM, hari317 said:

Excellent chart David, once completed it will be an excellent resource. Under barrels you might want to add celluloid for the 50's decade. Early to mid 60's early plastic barrel's filling system was press fit filler with higher ink capacity.

Duplicate post.  Sorry.

Mod, please delete this one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Seney724 said:

This thread is such a great resource, especially the chart created by @DKbRS.

 

This information might be buried in here somewhere, but can someone tell me:

1.  What year the 149's made the transition from celluloid to resin?

2.  What year the 149's two thin cap rings transitioned from sterling silver to gold?

 

Thanks!

Think 1959 is considered the end of celluloid and silver rings era and beginning of resin and all gold rings era. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How about the piston turning knobs? 

Once the production of the celluloid 149s ended and MB moved into the era of the resin 149 have those resin piston turning knobs changed at all in terms of shape, size, etc?

Or, are they all interchangeable?  To mean, for example, can any resin piston turning knob from 1960 (+/-) to 1990 (+/-) be interchanged with any other regardless of decade of production?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe the answers to the recent questions are clear from the chart and other posts in this thread. To put it short:

 

The first plastic (resin, rolled gold cap rings, friction fit mechanism) is considered 1962-1966(?). In 1967 already appeared the second generation plastic model (screw-in mechanism) and stayed there all the way through the seventies.


The celluloid pens had a wholly different metal “telescopic” piston mechanism. No knob or any other part except for the nib, feed and collar are interchangeable between celluloid and plastic (1962-1981) models of 149.

 

For resin piston knob-and-spiral assemblies I know that they’re interchangeable for 149s made between 1962 and 1990s. For later I’m not certain, but it can be found out within this thread.

FF3B62B0-A7CB-4BC6-9EA3-7AEB03DD216E.jpeg.d9f983158ea09652106347ee8afc18a7.jpeg

Here’s a photo of the knob and the piston driving helix spiral assembly, in resin 149 models. In some later models the spiral is black, but is functionally the same.

 

I don’t know if there has been a year or so production gap between celluloid and plastic (resin) 149.

 

Hope this can help.

 

Edited by stoen
photo added
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, stoen said:

I believe the answers to the recent questions are clear from the chart and other posts in this thread. To put it short:

 

The first plastic (resin, rolled gold cap rings, friction fit mechanism) is considered 1962-1966. In 1967 already appeared the second generation plastic model (screw-in mechanism).


The celluloid pens had a wholly different metal “telescopic” piston mechanism. No knob or any other part except the nib, feed and collar are interchangeable between celluloid and (1962-1981) models of 149.

 

For resin piston knobs and spiral assemblies I know that are interchangeable for 149s made between 1962 and 1990s. For later I’m not certain, but can be easily found out.

 

I don’t know if there has been a year or so production gap between celluloid and plastic (resin) 149.

 

Hope this can help.

Thank you!  Yes, it helps!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, stoen said:

I believe the answers to the recent questions are clear from the chart and other posts in this thread. To put it short:

 

The first plastic (resin, rolled gold cap rings, friction fit mechanism) is considered 1962-1966. In 1967 already appeared the second generation plastic model (screw-in mechanism).


The celluloid pens had a wholly different metal “telescopic” piston mechanism. No knob or any other part except the nib, feed and collar are interchangeable between celluloid and (1962-1981) models of 149.

 

For resin piston knob-and-spiral assemblies I know that they’re interchangeable for 149s made between 1962 and 1990s. For later I’m not certain, but it can be found out within this thread.

 

I don’t know if there has been a year or so production gap between celluloid and plastic (resin) 149.

 

Hope this can help.

You, sir, are a living encyclopedia. Although I have owned and used 149s for more than 40 years, and have done a fair amount of research on this great model, I believe you have forgotten more than I ever knew. We all learn something new and important with each of your contributions. Thank you, stoen. Be well.  Best wishes, Barry

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Seney724 said:

Thank you!  Yes, it helps!

I also don’t know if the manufacturing and marketing dates of “friction fit”(1962+) and “screw in”(1967+) models possibly overlapped. I had some conflicting information on this, so they possibly did…

I wrote everything to the best of my knowledge.

 

2 hours ago, Barry Gabay said:

Thank you, stoen. Be well.  Best wishes, Barry

 

Thanks for your kind words. You are the one to be thanked to @Barry Gabay, for your serious recearchers spirit, supportive, positive attitude and quality of your thought in this Forum. Best wishes, 

@stoen

🙂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 9 months later...
  • 2 months later...

I have what may be a pre-1990 pen, but it's hard to tell. Made a separate thread with detailed photos:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Announcements


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43844
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      33583
    3. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    4. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      26772
    5. jar
      jar
      26105
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • Shanghai Knife Dude
      I have the Sailor Naginata and some fancy blade nibs coming after 2022 by a number of new workshop from China.  With all my respect, IMHO, they are all (bleep) in doing chinese characters.  Go use a bush, or at least a bush pen. 
    • A Smug Dill
      It is the reason why I'm so keen on the idea of a personal library — of pens, nibs, inks, paper products, etc. — and spent so much money, as well as time and effort, to “build” it for myself (because I can't simply remember everything, especially as I'm getting older fast) and my wife, so that we can “know”; and, instead of just disposing of what displeased us, or even just not good enough to be “given the time of day” against competition from >500 other pens and >500 other inks for our at
    • adamselene
      Agreed.  And I think it’s good to be aware of this early on and think about at the point of buying rather than rationalizing a purchase..
    • A Smug Dill
      Alas, one cannot know “good” without some idea of “bad” against which to contrast; and, as one of my former bosses (back when I was in my twenties) used to say, “on the scale of good to bad…”, it's a spectrum, not a dichotomy. Whereas subjectively acceptable (or tolerable) and unacceptable may well be a dichotomy to someone, and finding whether the threshold or cusp between them lies takes experiencing many degrees of less-than-ideal, especially if the decision is somehow influenced by factors o
    • adamselene
      I got my first real fountain pen on my 60th birthday and many hundreds of pens later I’ve often thought of what I should’ve known in the beginning. I have many pens, the majority of which have some objectionable feature. If they are too delicate, or can’t be posted, or they are too precious to face losing , still they are users, but only in very limited environments..  I have a big disliking for pens that have the cap jump into the air and fly off. I object to Pens that dry out, or leave blobs o
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...