Jump to content

15, The Name "Stylograph"


rhr

Recommended Posts

And here are a couple of stylo patents that dare to call the pen by its rightful name. Frank Dubiel and a few others strained to draw a distinction between the early stylographs and the later drafting pens such as the "Rapidograph". They always went to great pains to try to force a difference on them when there really wasn't one. Well, here are two later patents, 2,136,967 and 3,938,899, that aren't ashamed or shy to use the correct name for them.

 

They're all "stylographs".

 

George Kovalenko.

 

:ph34r:

Edited by rhr

rhrpen(at)gmail.com

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • rhr

    3

  • Johnny Appleseed

    2

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

I think the reason that some try to make a distinction is because Stylo's have gotten a reputation for being technical pens like the Rapidograph that are not always suitable for writing. Vintage Stylo's were, of course, made to write and could be as smooth as any fountain pen.

 

A much more usefull way of putting it is that not all Stylographic pens are technical drafting pens like Rapidographs.

 

John

So if you have a lot of ink,

You should get a Yink, I think.

 

- Dr Suess

 

Always looking for pens by Baird-North, Charles Ingersoll, and nibs marked "CHI"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the reason that some try to make a distinction is because Stylo's have gotten a reputation for being technical pens like the Rapidograph that are not always suitable for writing. Vintage Stylo's were, of course, made to write and could be as smooth as any fountain pen.

John, I take your point, but in my experience they are both equally easy, or difficult to write with. Your distinction is like saying that a Waterman's #7 Ripple with a Yellow rounded point that writes on any paper in any direction is different from a Waterman's #7 Ripple with a Blue blunt point that makes thick and thin italic strokes. They're both still Waterman's #7 Ripples. Actually, here's a better way of putting it. Your distinction is like saying that a Waterman's #7 Ripple with a Yellow nib is different from a Waterman's 100 Year Pen with a Blue nib. They're both still lever-filling pens. In your distinction between a stylo and a technical pen, you're trying to differentiate between writing points, but they are still the same basic type of writing instrument underneath.

 

As for the technical pens not always being suitable for general writing, why would you want to use a race horse to pull a plough, or enter a work horse in the Kentucky Derby? Even though technical pens have their specific uses, they can be adapted to other purposes, if you slow down the writing. You can't race either type of stylo point across the page the way you can a Yellow nib, or even a Blue nib.

 

George Kovalenko.

 

:ph34r:

Edited by rhr

rhrpen(at)gmail.com

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

George,

 

I agree that both the rounded-tip stylos and the technical stylos are both stylographic pens, which is why I suggested -

 

A much more usefull way of putting it is that not all Stylographic pens are technical drafting pens like Rapidographs.

 

For many modern users, the only type of stylo they have encountered is a technical pen, and they get the impression stylographic = Rapidograph. To use your horse metaphor, a lot of people have only seen plow-horses. The point is that there are race horses and quarter horses too - you can't judge all horses by a plow-horse.

 

To make an analogy similar to your Waterman Yellow vs Blue, if the only fountain pens widely available today were Sheaffer Calligraphy pens, we would want to let people know there are a lot more nib choices out there than the nibs on Sheaffer Calligraphy pens. Yes, they may both be fountain pens, and the difference is only in the tip, but there is a world of difference from a sharp edged steel calligraphy nib and a buttery-smooth Parker 51, or a flexible Waterman NY nib, or even a well-tuned and smoothed Sheaffer non-nonsense round nib. Same basic pen, in the case of the latter, but a world of difference in the writing experience.

 

And alas I don't have any of the Waterman color nibs to compare it too, but I have a hard-rubber Inkograph that can race across the page almost as fast as a Parker 51, or anything else I have. It is a slight bit more finicky, and needs a slightly different angle than most fountain pens, but only slightly (I have had many nibs more finicky).

 

John

So if you have a lot of ink,

You should get a Yink, I think.

 

- Dr Suess

 

Always looking for pens by Baird-North, Charles Ingersoll, and nibs marked "CHI"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a hard-rubber Inkograph that can race across the page almost as fast as a Parker 51, or anything else I have. It is a slight bit more finicky, and needs a slightly different angle than most fountain pens, but only slightly...

Ah ha, I think we're in agreement, John.

 

Take care,

 

George.

 

:ph34r:

rhrpen(at)gmail.com

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43844
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      33494
    3. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    4. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      26624
    5. jar
      jar
      26101
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • Shanghai Knife Dude
      I have the Sailor Naginata and some fancy blade nibs coming after 2022 by a number of new workshop from China.  With all my respect, IMHO, they are all (bleep) in doing chinese characters.  Go use a bush, or at least a bush pen. 
    • A Smug Dill
      It is the reason why I'm so keen on the idea of a personal library — of pens, nibs, inks, paper products, etc. — and spent so much money, as well as time and effort, to “build” it for myself (because I can't simply remember everything, especially as I'm getting older fast) and my wife, so that we can “know”; and, instead of just disposing of what displeased us, or even just not good enough to be “given the time of day” against competition from >500 other pens and >500 other inks for our at
    • adamselene
      Agreed.  And I think it’s good to be aware of this early on and think about at the point of buying rather than rationalizing a purchase..
    • A Smug Dill
      Alas, one cannot know “good” without some idea of “bad” against which to contrast; and, as one of my former bosses (back when I was in my twenties) used to say, “on the scale of good to bad…”, it's a spectrum, not a dichotomy. Whereas subjectively acceptable (or tolerable) and unacceptable may well be a dichotomy to someone, and finding whether the threshold or cusp between them lies takes experiencing many degrees of less-than-ideal, especially if the decision is somehow influenced by factors o
    • adamselene
      I got my first real fountain pen on my 60th birthday and many hundreds of pens later I’ve often thought of what I should’ve known in the beginning. I have many pens, the majority of which have some objectionable feature. If they are too delicate, or can’t be posted, or they are too precious to face losing , still they are users, but only in very limited environments..  I have a big disliking for pens that have the cap jump into the air and fly off. I object to Pens that dry out, or leave blobs o
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...