Jump to content

J.Herbin Encre Rouge (Rose Scent)


Immoteus

Recommended Posts

Here is the fourth ink of the J.Herbin "Les Subtiles" Series. I apologize for the messy review as I was a bit rushed (It's painfully clear that margins and straight lines are not my strong points :P ).

 

Disclaimer: Any feathering in this review is caused by the sharp tines of the dip nib digging into the paper.

 

post-10295-1206083040_thumb.jpg

post-10295-1206083053_thumb.jpg

Edited by Immoteus

Virtute enim ipsa non tam multi praediti esse quam videri volunt.

 

Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.

 

 

Contact Information for Japanese Manufacturers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 6
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Immoteus

    3

  • cmeisenzahl

    1

  • girlieg33k

    1

  • Ondina

    1

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Thanks for the review! The last thing I need is another bottle of ink -- but I like the looks of this one. It could work as an editing ink, though I mainly use brown and orange to edit. The subtlety of the rose scent, as an editing ink, will be a bonus. A strong rosy scent, coupled with the colour, would likely send the wrong message... :)

 

 

P.S. Have you tried it in a regular fountain pen to see if its lubricating properties improve?

 

 

Edited by girlieg33k

Talking about fountain pens is like dancing about architecture.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lovely!. Both the color and the review!. I heard a few months back that Herbin had started producing scented inks also. Is nice, I have always missed the scent of the old inks my aunts used to write their notes with. I wonder how would tha ink behave in a regular Fp in the long run, though. Great, now I want to have it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is a scan of the ink used in different pens. For some reason the flow was inconsistent in the Sheaffer school pen, but it does exhibit the best shading out of the group. Fortunately, lubrication properties did improve with fountain pens (but not much, since this ink is better suited for wet writers).

 

post-10295-1206141149_thumb.jpg

Edited by Immoteus

Virtute enim ipsa non tam multi praediti esse quam videri volunt.

 

Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.

 

 

Contact Information for Japanese Manufacturers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...

I had intended to write some Christmas correspondence with 1670, but my offspring has absconded with it, so I took out a bottle of Les Subtiles Roses to write my letters. I have it in a Graphomatic with a nice flexible nib. I have found it to be so bleedy and feathering that it is useless as letter writing ink. I was writing on a very heavy linen paper and it still bled right through. So having wasted a sheet of white, I decided to try it in stone parchment paper and the result is the same. It smells lovely, it is a beautiful colour, but I really do not think it is good ink for my uses. I do not have this problem with the Bleu Nuit, however the cologne like smell of that is cloying and not at all subtle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43972
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      35347
    3. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      30426
    4. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    5. Bo Bo Olson
      Bo Bo Olson
      27744
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • inkstainedruth
      Thanks for the info (I only used B&W film and learned to process that).   Boy -- the stuff I learn here!  Just continually astounded at the depth and breadth of knowledge in this community! Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth 
    • Ceilidh
    • Ceilidh
      >Well, I knew people who were photography majors in college, and I'm pretty sure that at least some of them were doing photos in color,<   I'm sure they were, and my answer assumes that. It just wasn't likely to have been Kodachrome.  It would have been the films I referred to as "other color films." (Kodachrome is not a generic term for color film. It is a specific film that produces transparencies, or slides, by a process not used for any other film. There are other color trans
    • inkstainedruth
      @Ceilidh -- Well, I knew people who were photography majors in college, and I'm pretty sure that at least some of them were doing photos in color, not just B&W like I learned to process.  Whether they were doing the processing of the film themselves in one of the darkrooms, or sending their stuff out to be processed commercially?  That I don't actually know, but had always assumed that they were processing their own film. Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth   ETA: And of course
    • jmccarty3
      Kodachrome 25 was the most accurate film for clinical photography and was used by dermatologists everywhere. I got magnificent results with a Nikon F2 and a MicroNikkor 60 mm lens, using a manually calibrated small flash on a bracket. I wish there were a filter called "Kodachrome 25 color balance" on my iPhone camera.
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...