Jump to content

Sleeve / Thumb Filling Pen Chronology


sztainbok

Recommended Posts

I don't know if this subject has been or is being addressed elswhere in the site.

My interest is to attempt to establish the chronology and development of pens that use the so called sleeve or thumb filling mechanism.

If we define a sleeve filling pen as one that is filled by pressing directly on the pressure bar with a finger, where access to the pressure bar is protected by a movable or removable sleeve or some other cover, so far I could clasify them in the following categories:

 

Rotating sleeve pens, such as Century and Aikin Lambert pens. The sleeve has a cut-away and by rotating it it exposes the pressure bar.

Sliding sleeve, such as the John Holland design. The sleeve slides along the barrel to expose the pressure bar.

Split barrel, such as the Laughlin design. The barrel is split and part of it extends out to expose the pressure bar. Also used by LeBoeuf.

Full barrel slide, such as the latter LeBoeuf pens, the whole barrel slides out at the secion joint.

Full barrel removal, such as the Parker 51 Aerometric, the whole barrel is removed to access the pressure bar.

 

Jonathan Steinberg in his book Fountain Pens page 31, states that the sleeve filling system was probably initially developed by Century or Aikin Lambert.

I found the following patents in a search that very likely is not complete:

 

No. 799897, W.I. Ferris, assigned to L. E. Waterman, application May 24, 1905, pattented Sep. 19,1905

This patent is for a rotating sleeve filling system

 

No. 800129, Robert Gorham, application Jan. 18, 1905, pattented Sep. 19, 1905

It seems to me that this patent is for a split barrel pen, with no retention means for the part of the barrel that slides out.

 

No. 821940, John Holland, application Feb. 17, 1906, pattented May 29, 1906

This patent is for a sliding sleeve mechanism.

 

No. 828973, W. W. Sanford, application Oct. 10, 1906, pattented Aug. 21, 1906

This patent is for a rotating sleeve system.

 

No. 1038068 G. F. Barret, application Feb. 16, 1912, pattented Sep. 10, 1912

Thes patent is for a rotating sleeve pen.

 

No. 1042695, J. W. Laughlin, application Apr. 20, 1912, pattented Oct. 29, 1912.

This patent is for a split barrel pen.

 

Looking at Plewa's Klips, we could say that Leboef started making the sleeve filler with full barrel slide, in 1932 and Parker started using the Aerometric system on the 51 in 1948.

I don't know if some of the early patents above were used by Akin Lambert or Century.

 

I would appreciate if those interested in this subject would contribute by commenting on the definition and categories I am proposing, and contributing to determine who made the first pen in each category. Also adding some pictures if available. I own a Leboeuf and a Prker 51 that I will upload shortly.

Edited by sztainbok
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 67
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • sztainbok

    27

  • simp

    12

  • DanDeM

    6

  • Penprophet

    5

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Interesting pursuit.

 

I have a Wirt Ring Top with a rotating sleeve that exposes the JBar. A Matchstick fill. Probably 1910ish.

Also an Edison with an exposed JBar, a coin fill. Probably later, say 1915 or so.

Both are BCHR and neither have a patent imprint.

 

Also a Holland that may be out the scope of your effort since the bar is not exposed, but nonetheless quirky. In a 1910 catalog he calls the filling system "Self-Filling" and on another page "Self-Inking", offering the following illustrated instructions.

The flat button B on the outside of the barrel is attached to a ring going around the filler R (i.e. Sac) A metal bar is attached to the opposite side. When the button is lifted the sack is compressed; place the pen in ink, release the button and the pen is filled.

 

No pics right now, but if these are of interest, will post some in the next few days.

Edited by Blotto
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for your interest. I am posting the picture of a Parker 51 and a Leboeuf. If it is not too much trouble, it would be interesting if you post your pens.

Thank you,

Victor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Victor:

Here's the Holland. Wirt and Edison to follow.

 

Filling accomplished by lifting the button that is midway between the bands.

 

post-35057-0-51896200-1320086773.jpg

 

 

This is the imprint. The fill button is just above it.

 

post-35057-0-64437700-1320087039.jpg

 

Dan

Edited by Blotto
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Waterman 412 Sleeve Filler, using a later patent by Ferris, pat #950817. Filed in Aug 23, 1909, issued Mar 1, 1910.

 

Not sure when these went into production. Pen companies often used new tech while the patent was pending. Advertisements for this can be found by 1911 at least. The only ones that I've seen have been slip cap versions.

 

 

post-4689-0-98448900-1320099660.jpg

Edited by Jeff L
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unfortunately I don't have any sleeve filler pen photos excepted a Parker 51 and a Le Bouef that you already have. But I have two other patents, and the first one is earlier than those you listed:

 

781649, February 1905, Robert A. Hamilton, half to John P. Lein

1804522, December 1931, Walsh, Frank T., Assignee: LEBOEUF FOUNTAIN PEN CO INC

 

Simone

Fountain Pen Wiki - www.FountainPen.it

Fountain pen Chronology (need help to improve...)

Old advertisement (needing new ones to enlarge the gallery...)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking at Plewa's Klips, we could say that Leboef started making the sleeve filler with full barrel slide, in 1932 and Parker started using the Aerometric system on the 51 in 1948.

Sorry for my ignorance, but what is this Plewa's Klips that consent to date Leboeuf sleeve filler?

 

Regards

Simone

Fountain Pen Wiki - www.FountainPen.it

Fountain pen Chronology (need help to improve...)

Old advertisement (needing new ones to enlarge the gallery...)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we want to keep this thread on topic, we should not confuse the issue with matchstick fillers, coin-fillers, or saddle-fillers. Let's stick to true thumb-fillers, where the pressure bar is exposed and directly pressed by a finger to collapse the sac.

 

"Plewa's Klips" was an illustrated feature that ran for years in Pen World magazine. It was a single-page capsule history, with each installment focusing on a single model, brand, or feature. As a source, however, it should not be relied upon uncritically, since dates were taken from what was thought correct at the time -- which in most cases is now over 20 years ago.

Edited by Vintagepens
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Jonathan Steinberg in his book Fountain Pens page 31, states that the sleeve filling system was probably initially developed by Century or Aikin Lambert.

I found the following patents in a search that very likely is not complete:

 

One patent that is absent from your list is Frank Mooney's No. 879,296, Feb. 18, 1908. This was the mechanism/patent for the thumb fillers offered by Century. Century, however, didn't develop this mechanism, but purchased its parts from CE Barrett (who acquired the patent from Mooney).

 

Dave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I have one (that I can think of right now) that I believe can be attributed to Sanford & Bennett. I originally thought it was an Aikin Lambert, but now know this is not the case as the mechanism is different (so those poking around at the name of the image will note I have called it an Aikin):

 

http://www.esterbrook.net/collection/alcosleeve.jpg

http://www.esterbrook.net/collection/alcosleeveo.jpg

http://www.esterbrook.net/collection/alcosleeveopen.jpg

 

Cheers!

Brian

Edited by Brian Anderson
www.esterbrook.net All Esterbrook, All the Time.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

If we want to keep this thread on topic, we should not confuse the issue with matchstick fillers, coin-fillers, or saddle-fillers. Let's stick to true thumb-fillers, where the pressure bar is exposed and directly pressed by a finger to collapse the sac.

 

"Plewa's Klips" was an illustrated feature that ran for years in Pen World magazine. It was a single-page capsule history, with each installment focusing on a single model, brand, or feature. As a source, however, it should not be relied upon uncritically, since dates were taken from what was thought correct at the time -- which in most cases is now over 20 years ago.

Thanks David for keeping us on track. As you say we should stick to pens that are filled by pressing with a finger a pressure bar that acts on the sack. The pressure bar can be covered by some means by a sleeve or the barrel, which would include a Parker 51 or LeBoeuf.

Victor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Hicks currently listed on ebay (320826591091) has a patent date of (possibly July) 1905 on the cap, if that helps with your records any

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Hicks currently listed on ebay (320826591091) has a patent date of (possibly July) 1905 on the cap, if that helps with your records any

Thanks for the information. The pen looks very nice. It's a split barrel red mottled hard rubber model. I searched Google Patents and could not find the patenet. Perhaps someone can help finding it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Patent number: 794836

Filed: Apr 1, 1905

Issued: Jul 18, 1905

 

By Thomas P Ambrose. Not assigned to anyone in particular.

 

This patent is a development on another sleeve filler patent, 784528 from Mar 14, 1905.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Patent number: 794836

Filed: Apr 1, 1905

Issued: Jul 18, 1905

 

By Thomas P Ambrose. Not assigned to anyone in particular.

 

This patent is a development on another sleeve filler patent, 784528 from Mar 14, 1905.

Thank you Jeff

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Patent number: 794836

Filed: Apr 1, 1905

Issued: Jul 18, 1905

 

By Thomas P Ambrose. Not assigned to anyone in particular.

 

This patent is a development on another sleeve filler patent, 784528 from Mar 14, 1905.

Jeff,

I looked at those two patents, How do we know that they were used for the Hicks pen?

Also, after reading the patents, it seems to me that there is no pressure bar and we would be pressing with the thumb directly on the rubber sac in order to fill it. Did I miss something?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, neither the pictures for the auction nor the drawings and description in the patent show a pressure bar.

 

As for connecting this particular patent with the Hicks, absent a specific assignment, it's a best guess. The imprint indicates 1905 and a perusal of patents from that year throws this one up.

 

 

There are others from that year aside from the two you've already listed.

 

Patent number: 781649

Filed: May 20, 1904

Issued: Feb 7, 1905

 

Robert A Hamilton

 

This one has a pressure bar.

 

 

 

Patent number: 807500

Filed: May 9, 1905

Issued: Dec 19, 1905

 

William W Sanford

 

This may be the Sanford and Bennett that Brian mentioned above.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you Jeff, I will wait a few more weeks and then I will try to put together a summary of the infomation received and see if we can make sense of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Patent number: 794836

Filed: Apr 1, 1905

Issued: Jul 18, 1905

 

By Thomas P Ambrose. Not assigned to anyone in particular.

 

This patent is a development on another sleeve filler patent, 784528 from Mar 14, 1905.

Jeff,

I looked at those two patents, How do we know that they were used for the Hicks pen?

Also, after reading the patents, it seems to me that there is no pressure bar and we would be pressing with the thumb directly on the rubber sac in order to fill it. Did I miss something?

The Hick's ink sac was very definitely petrified, so I would imagine that if there was a pressure bar intended it would have been in situ. I can say for certain that was not the case.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have attempted to summarize the information that was supplied through this thread. Please see the attached table.

 

I was unable to find the patents for the Parker 51 Aerometric filling system or the Leboeuf full barrel sliding model.

 

I am interested on knowing if R. A. Hamilton's patent 781649 and W. I. Ferris' patent 799897 were ever produced.

 

I would appreciate your help in correcting and expanding the information on the chart.

 

Victor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43844
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      33563
    3. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    4. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      26747
    5. jar
      jar
      26101
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • Shanghai Knife Dude
      I have the Sailor Naginata and some fancy blade nibs coming after 2022 by a number of new workshop from China.  With all my respect, IMHO, they are all (bleep) in doing chinese characters.  Go use a bush, or at least a bush pen. 
    • A Smug Dill
      It is the reason why I'm so keen on the idea of a personal library — of pens, nibs, inks, paper products, etc. — and spent so much money, as well as time and effort, to “build” it for myself (because I can't simply remember everything, especially as I'm getting older fast) and my wife, so that we can “know”; and, instead of just disposing of what displeased us, or even just not good enough to be “given the time of day” against competition from >500 other pens and >500 other inks for our at
    • adamselene
      Agreed.  And I think it’s good to be aware of this early on and think about at the point of buying rather than rationalizing a purchase..
    • A Smug Dill
      Alas, one cannot know “good” without some idea of “bad” against which to contrast; and, as one of my former bosses (back when I was in my twenties) used to say, “on the scale of good to bad…”, it's a spectrum, not a dichotomy. Whereas subjectively acceptable (or tolerable) and unacceptable may well be a dichotomy to someone, and finding whether the threshold or cusp between them lies takes experiencing many degrees of less-than-ideal, especially if the decision is somehow influenced by factors o
    • adamselene
      I got my first real fountain pen on my 60th birthday and many hundreds of pens later I’ve often thought of what I should’ve known in the beginning. I have many pens, the majority of which have some objectionable feature. If they are too delicate, or can’t be posted, or they are too precious to face losing , still they are users, but only in very limited environments..  I have a big disliking for pens that have the cap jump into the air and fly off. I object to Pens that dry out, or leave blobs o
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...