Jump to content

Diamine Registrar's Blue


dizzypen

Recommended Posts

The full version of this review, along with all my others, can be found at The Dizzy Pen.

 

This scan was done after the ink had changed colors to a much dark blue almost black.

 

(click to enlarge and sharpen the image)

 

http://dizzypen.files.wordpress.com/2011/07/dia-registrars-ink-card21.jpg

 

This ink was sent to me for review by the good folks at Diamine Ink Co. I am not otherwise affiliated with them.

Equal Opportunity Ink and Fountain Pen User.

 

My blog: The Dizzy Pen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • dcwaites

    1

  • dizzypen

    1

  • Torculus Resupinus

    1

  • Uncle Red

    1

One of my favorite inks. I found it had faster drying times in a fine nib and it even worked on some credit card receipts. I love to keep checking on it to see the color changes. I noticed that the color darkens slowly on an enclosed space like a closed journal and faster on a pad of paper left out overnight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am very partial to Registrar's Ink. I find its behavior varies considerably depending on the paper used: sometimes it quickly goes almost pure black (with a vibrant quality I prize), other times it will retain a blue tint forever. Sometimes the shading is very noticeable, other times hardly so. The chemical composition of the paper (which I have no definite knowledge of) seems to be the key rather than the smoothness or absorbency of the paper. Like most inks it will also vary depending on the pen used.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had a bottle some time ago. I didn't use it enough, and it clogged up a Platinum Preppy I had it in. I liked it though, as it was the only ink I had at the time that would work on the execrable stationery supplied by by office.

 

I gave it away, strangely enough to a JP, aka Registrar, for use in signing official documents...

 

Recently, I acquired this --

 

post-9467-0-84535300-1315110202.jpg

 

 

It appears to be an early/mid 20th C precursor to the current Registrar's ink. Once made up it looks and behaves the same as the Registrar's ink when I had it. (And no, I haven't made up the full quart's worth).

 

Can anybody from Diamine comment on the history of the names on the container?

Actually, I just looked it up. From the Diamine Website

Diamine dates back to 1864 when the company was founded by T Webster and Co. in London. The business moved to Liverpool in 1925 and T Webster and Co. changed its name to Diamine in 1964.
So the ink was made sometime between 1925 and 1964.

 

Still, if anybody from Diamine is lurking, could you see if there are any of the old containers hiding in a storeroom and perhaps consider offering it to FPN members?

fpn_1412827311__pg_d_104def64.gif




“Them as can do has to do for them as can’t.


And someone has to speak up for them as has no voices.”


Granny Aching

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would advise moving this into its own thread so we can keep the modern Diamine Registrar's review on topic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have this under the "Chesterfield Archival Vault" name. Ordered it from X Fountain Pens (no affil) and that web site claims it has neutral pH levels.

 

A very nice ink and I too love to watch it darken over time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43844
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      33583
    3. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    4. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      26772
    5. jar
      jar
      26105
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • Shanghai Knife Dude
      I have the Sailor Naginata and some fancy blade nibs coming after 2022 by a number of new workshop from China.  With all my respect, IMHO, they are all (bleep) in doing chinese characters.  Go use a bush, or at least a bush pen. 
    • A Smug Dill
      It is the reason why I'm so keen on the idea of a personal library — of pens, nibs, inks, paper products, etc. — and spent so much money, as well as time and effort, to “build” it for myself (because I can't simply remember everything, especially as I'm getting older fast) and my wife, so that we can “know”; and, instead of just disposing of what displeased us, or even just not good enough to be “given the time of day” against competition from >500 other pens and >500 other inks for our at
    • adamselene
      Agreed.  And I think it’s good to be aware of this early on and think about at the point of buying rather than rationalizing a purchase..
    • A Smug Dill
      Alas, one cannot know “good” without some idea of “bad” against which to contrast; and, as one of my former bosses (back when I was in my twenties) used to say, “on the scale of good to bad…”, it's a spectrum, not a dichotomy. Whereas subjectively acceptable (or tolerable) and unacceptable may well be a dichotomy to someone, and finding whether the threshold or cusp between them lies takes experiencing many degrees of less-than-ideal, especially if the decision is somehow influenced by factors o
    • adamselene
      I got my first real fountain pen on my 60th birthday and many hundreds of pens later I’ve often thought of what I should’ve known in the beginning. I have many pens, the majority of which have some objectionable feature. If they are too delicate, or can’t be posted, or they are too precious to face losing , still they are users, but only in very limited environments..  I have a big disliking for pens that have the cap jump into the air and fly off. I object to Pens that dry out, or leave blobs o
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...