Jump to content

Just What is Solv-X


Parker Quink Turquoise

Recommended Posts

I know Slov-X is an ingredient put in ink that is suppose to clean your pen as you write.What I would like to know is just what the ingredient Solv-X is made from?

Edited by Parker Quink Turquoise
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 49
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Mr.Rene

    5

  • corniche

    5

  • Parker Quink Turquoise

    4

  • bunnspecial

    4

I know Slov-X is an ingredient put in ink that is suppose to clean your pen as you write.What I would like to know is just what the ingredient Solv-X is made from?

I think it was Phenol/ carbolic acid. Now declared a carcinogen and was removed, which is why 'Wrights Coal Tar Soap' also smells wrong because ther's no carbolic acid in that either any more.

 

Regards,

 

Richard.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very interesting Richard.I have noticed that my older bottles of Parker Quink Turqoise have a very acid smell to them.My later bottles Made in UK seem to have a sweet smell.Both contain Solv-X.I am guessing that the older bottles have a different smell because of age.

Edited by Parker Quink Turquoise
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it was Phenol/ carbolic acid.

 

Hmm... I thought the phenol acid is the aseptic and fungicidal ingridient. But Parker declared the Solve-X is the cleaner.

 

I'm not insane, my mother had me tested (с)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it was Phenol/ carbolic acid.

 

Hmm... I thought the phenol acid is the aseptic and fungicidal ingridient. But Parker declared the Solve-X is the cleaner.

 

 

Phenol would do both. A solution of phenol in water is what Lister used to sterilize his surgical instruments for what became known as "antiseptic surgery". It is nasty stuff.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some more questons concering quink ink and Solv-X.

 

I have a numder of old blue diamond shaped bottles of Parker Super Quink Permanent Turquoise ink.It does not say contains Solv-X on the box.It states only,"Cleans you pen as it writes".

1.Would these bottles contain Solv-X or was something else used before the introduction of Solv-X?

 

The next questons has to deal with Quink and Super Quink.

2.What is the difference if any?

3.From what I have seen it started out as Quink,then went to Super Quink and in the 1980's or 90's went back to just Quink again.Am I correct in this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some more questons concering quink ink and Solv-X.

 

I have a numder of old blue diamond shaped bottles of Parker Super Quink Permanent Turquoise ink.It does not say contains Solv-X on the box.It states only,"Cleans you pen as it writes".

1.Would these bottles contain Solv-X or was something else used before the introduction of Solv-X?

 

The next questons has to deal with Quink and Super Quink.

2.What is the difference if any?

3.From what I have seen it started out as Quink,then went to Super Quink and in the 1980's or 90's went back to just Quink again.Am I correct in this?

 

 

1. The blue diamond shaped Quink bottles had Solv-X in them, as ink that was made after that ink also had Solv-X in it. I'd assume it was a marketing decision to not include that information on the box or label. Here's a selection from a Parker 61 insert:

 

http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b222/johnboz/ParkerQuink62.jpg

 

2. As far as I know, there is no difference between Quink and Super Quink except for manufacture date. Once again, I'm pretty sure it was all marketing. Super Quink should not be confused with Superchrome! Both were made by Parker around the same time, but Superchrome was manufactured exclusively for Parker "51" and "21" pens. It is known to damage pens due to it's high alkalinity. Super Quink was advertised as "the ink that's best for all pens".

 

3. You are correct.

I've got a blog!

Fountain Pen Love

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Solv-X is likely a non-ionic detergent. These substances are non-corrosive and do a great job of cleaning. Given the name "Solv-X" I would hazard a guess that the chemical in question is Triton-X, which I think appeared about the same time.

 

Peter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Solv-X is likely a non-ionic detergent. These substances are non-corrosive and do a great job of cleaning. Given the name "Solv-X" I would hazard a guess that the chemical in question is Triton-X, which I think appeared about the same time.

 

Peter

 

Maybe the safety datasheet can help: http://www.solvaychemicals.us/static/wma/p...v-X_CAN_ENG.pdf

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Peter, very interesting. Don't you think it's a Phenol?

 

Yes, I do think it was phenol -- I guess my answer wasn't very clear. Phenol is quite nasty stuff, but was widely used before 1960 in a variety of consumer products because it killed germs and helped a wide variety of substances dissolve in water. Unfortunately, the properties that make it so effective in doing these jobs also make it hazardous to one's health.

 

Often in health and environmental issues you get similar good news / bad news stories.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Solv-X is likely a non-ionic detergent. These substances are non-corrosive and do a great job of cleaning. Given the name "Solv-X" I would hazard a guess that the chemical in question is Triton-X, which I think appeared about the same time.

 

For what it's worth, i've heard that, too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Peter, very interesting. Don't you think it's a Phenol?

 

Yes, I do think it was phenol -- I guess my answer wasn't very clear. Phenol is quite nasty stuff, but was widely used before 1960 in a variety of consumer products because it killed germs and helped a wide variety of substances dissolve in water. Unfortunately, the properties that make it so effective in doing these jobs also make it hazardous to one's health.

 

Often in health and environmental issues you get similar good news / bad news stories.

 

Last time I looked, phenol was still the active ingredient in some throat lozenges and throat sprays (eg Chloraseptic), because it's also a topical anesthetic. Must not be all that bad.... B)

 

From the name Solv-X, I would guess it was something like a surfactant, that makes the ink flow better.

The early bird may get the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A decade or so ago, I remember Camlin claimed their inks contained Camli-Solvx...It said so on the box that contained the bottle. I never knew what it meant at the time..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What I want to say - Parker Pen Company declared the Solv-X as a "Magic Ingredient", they even registered the trade mark, but we know that the Phenol was widely used by many ink-manufacturers.

It turns out that in fact the most of the inks contained Solv-X somehow.

Edited by maxS

D'Antheses never miss.

 

Parker. Стрелы и перья

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I doubt that Solv-X is phenol. Phenol is not a detergent, it's a preservative (and a very good one) but is required in amounts too high for safety if a child were to drink some of it, or stick a filled pen in their mouth and suck on it -those with small children will understand how this happens.

 

Phenol was the preservative of choice in many, many inks, and is in fact the source of the "ink" smell of many vintage inks. Very effective at preventing fermentation and mold growth. Formaldehyde also works very well, and is even more toxic, but I can smell it in some vintage inks, too.

 

Neither has any real impact on flow or detergent qualities.

 

Peter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Solv-X was a detergent used to aid flow (surfactant) and since it was a detergent, Parker could claim it cleaned, too. Much like many of you use a drop of liquid dish soap it further aid flow in your current bottles of ink. All the ink companies used a surfactant of one kind of another. Solv-X is memorable and well known amongst pen people because Parker was a great advertiser!

 

Phenol was used to inhibit mold growth.

 

Sam

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Peter, very interesting. Don't you think it's a Phenol?

 

Yes, I do think it was phenol -- I guess my answer wasn't very clear. Phenol is quite nasty stuff, but was widely used before 1960 in a variety of consumer products because it killed germs and helped a wide variety of substances dissolve in water. Unfortunately, the properties that make it so effective in doing these jobs also make it hazardous to one's health.

 

Often in health and environmental issues you get similar good news / bad news stories.

 

Last time I looked, phenol was still the active ingredient in some throat lozenges and throat sprays (eg Chloraseptic), because it's also a topical anesthetic. Must not be all that bad.... B)

 

From the name Solv-X, I would guess it was something like a surfactant, that makes the ink flow better.

 

Look again. The active ingredients in Chloraseptic are benzocaine and menthol. See http://www.chloraseptic.com/lozenge-cherry.htm

 

Try looking up phenol on the EPA's website or any of the "toxicity" databases on the web.

 

 

Edited to add phenol information from weblakes.com:

 

 

Health Hazard Information

 

 

 

Acute Effects:

 

 

* Inhalation and dermal exposure to phenol is highly irritating to the skin, eyes, and mucous membranes in humans. (1-3)

 

* Phenol is considered to be very toxic to humans through oral exposure, with ingestion of 1 g reported to be lethal, with symptoms including muscle weakness and tremors, loss of coordination, paralysis, convulsions, coma, and respiratory arrest. (1-3)

 

* Blood changes, liver and kidney damage, and cardiac toxicity including weak pulse, cardiac depression, and reduced blood pressure have been reported in humans acutely exposed to phenol by the oral route. (1,2)

 

* Acute (short-term) animal tests, such as the LD50 tests in rats, mice, and rabbits, have shown phenol to have high acute toxicity from oral exposure. (4)

 

 

More information is available from EPA's IRIS database.

 

Edited by Peter from Sherwood Park
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Solv-X was a detergent used to aid flow (surfactant) and since it was a detergent, Parker could claim it cleaned, too. Much like many of you use a drop of liquid dish soap it further aid flow in your current bottles of ink. All the ink companies used a surfactant of one kind of another. Solv-X is memorable and well known amongst pen people because Parker was a great advertiser!

 

Phenol was used to inhibit mold growth.

 

Sam

 

That was exactly my understanding also.

 

As far as being a harmful substance, Phenol is not that bad. I think toxicity is somewhere in the neighborhood of LD50 140mg/kg for humans and it has not been found to be a human cancer risk in the States. As with all things this is relative as I understand doctors find Warfarren useful for blood thinning and even Curare and Nitroglycerin have medical uses.

 

However, if anyone still is living in fear of having those old bottles of Parker ink with Solv-X in the house there are several here who are willing to take them off your hand. Just wrap them up nicely and mail them to us through the Post.

 

 

YMMV

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. The blue diamond shaped Quink bottles had Solv-X in them, as ink that was made after that ink also had Solv-X in it. I'd assume it was a marketing decision to not include that information on the box or label. Here's a selection from a Parker 61 insert:

 

http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b222/johnboz/ParkerQuink62.jpg

 

2. As far as I know, there is no difference between Quink and Super Quink except for manufacture date. Once again, I'm pretty sure it was all marketing. Super Quink should not be confused with Superchrome! Both were made by Parker around the same time, but Superchrome was manufactured exclusively for Parker "51" and "21" pens. It is known to damage pens due to it's high alkalinity. Super Quink was advertised as "the ink that's best for all pens".

 

3. You are correct.

Thank-you for the information,John.Very interesting.

 

I have about half a bottle of turquoise Parker Superchrome.Thanks for the heads up on its use.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43844
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      33558
    3. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    4. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      26730
    5. jar
      jar
      26101
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • Shanghai Knife Dude
      I have the Sailor Naginata and some fancy blade nibs coming after 2022 by a number of new workshop from China.  With all my respect, IMHO, they are all (bleep) in doing chinese characters.  Go use a bush, or at least a bush pen. 
    • A Smug Dill
      It is the reason why I'm so keen on the idea of a personal library — of pens, nibs, inks, paper products, etc. — and spent so much money, as well as time and effort, to “build” it for myself (because I can't simply remember everything, especially as I'm getting older fast) and my wife, so that we can “know”; and, instead of just disposing of what displeased us, or even just not good enough to be “given the time of day” against competition from >500 other pens and >500 other inks for our at
    • adamselene
      Agreed.  And I think it’s good to be aware of this early on and think about at the point of buying rather than rationalizing a purchase..
    • A Smug Dill
      Alas, one cannot know “good” without some idea of “bad” against which to contrast; and, as one of my former bosses (back when I was in my twenties) used to say, “on the scale of good to bad…”, it's a spectrum, not a dichotomy. Whereas subjectively acceptable (or tolerable) and unacceptable may well be a dichotomy to someone, and finding whether the threshold or cusp between them lies takes experiencing many degrees of less-than-ideal, especially if the decision is somehow influenced by factors o
    • adamselene
      I got my first real fountain pen on my 60th birthday and many hundreds of pens later I’ve often thought of what I should’ve known in the beginning. I have many pens, the majority of which have some objectionable feature. If they are too delicate, or can’t be posted, or they are too precious to face losing , still they are users, but only in very limited environments..  I have a big disliking for pens that have the cap jump into the air and fly off. I object to Pens that dry out, or leave blobs o
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...