Jump to content

The Fountain Pen Network uses (functional) cookies. Read the FPN Privacy Policy for more info.  To remove this message, please click here to accept the use of cookies






Photo

Hero 616


  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

#1 mstone

mstone

    Pensive Penman

  • Member - Gold

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,410 posts
  • Flag:

Posted 28 December 2008 - 00:28

h616.jpg
First impressions: 5

It's a cheap pen. No fancy box, no exotic story, just a pen. A pen obviously inspired by the Parker 51, with a hooded nib, clutch ring, a solid color plastic body, and an arrow clip. But you know going in that this is one of Hero's low tier pens, so expectations should be calibrated appropriately.

Appearance/Design: 5

The overall appearance is that of the Parker 51, as noted above, which people either like or dislike. I'll focus instead on the build quality and the differences from the 51. No doubt that the pen is constructed on thin margins. Some parts are out of alignment, the edges are sharp (e.g., around the opening where the nib emerges from the hood). The cap and body are constructed out of lighter material than a real 51. In terms of design, ther's actually a lot of refinement for such a low end pen. The clip seems fairly solidly attached to the cap, the clutch ring and the threaded portion between the section and filler are transparent (this is actually an improvement over the 51), and there's a breather tube to help efficiently fill the bladder. Within fairly tight budget constraints, Hero has done a goo job of evolving the 51 design.

h616.p51.jpg
(here's a Hero 616 [green] next to a Parker 51 [burgundy])

Weight & Dimensions: 5

Smaller and lighter than a 51. A little too much so for smaller hands.

Nib & Performance: 5

h616.p51.nibs.jpg

Very dry writer, toothy & stiff. The nib (steel) is quite functional, however, starting reliably even if uncapped. This is not the smooth nib of the 51. I can already guess why many people consider this the perfect pen for Baystate Blue.

Filling system: 7

h616.p51.open.jpg

Functional squeeze filler.

Cost & Value: 9

These can be found for only a couple of bucks. I can't imagine a better pen for that kind of money.

Conclusion: 7

Overall, a good implementation in the "cheap pen" category. It's rough to look at, and the build quality is relatively poor. But the design allows for that, and it's really functional--which is, I suppose, what counts most for a pen in this segment.

Attached Images

  • h616.nib.jpg

Edited by mstone, 28 December 2008 - 00:33.


Sponsored Content

#2 penmanila

penmanila

    Vacumaniac

  • Member - Gold

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,263 posts
  • Location:Manila/San Diego
  • Flag:

Posted 28 December 2008 - 00:43

thanks for the review. i was in shanghai last week and got a 10-pack of 616s (for the grand total of $13) to give away to pen-loving friends. as you say, it's lots of bang for the buck!

Check out my blog and my pens


#3 J English Smith

J English Smith

    Antique

  • Member - Gold

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,452 posts

Posted 28 December 2008 - 01:20

616s are indeed a great value for the money and some of them come darn close to the feel of a regular, user-grade 51. I have one that I've been carrying regularly now that ice season is upon us in Iowa. And yes, they make great give-aways for anyone wanting to try out a fountain pen to see if it's right for them.
<i>"Most people go through life using up half their energy trying to protect a dignity they never had."</i><br>-Marlowe, in <i>The Long Goodbye</i>

#4 Nihontochicken

Nihontochicken

    Nihonto Chicken

  • Member - Gold

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,316 posts

Posted 29 December 2008 - 03:09

If only Hero (or anybody) would upgrade the 616 materials and finish to Parker 51 levels and then sell the pen for five or even ten times what it does now, it would still be a great deal for the customer, relative to most of what else is available. Sigh.
Nihonto Chicken






Sponsored Content




|