Jump to content

Wing Sung #235?


Kelvandor

Recommended Posts

So, while stumbling around flea-bay, I found two listings for the Wing Sung #235 with a "triumph style" nib.

 

Does anyone out there have any experience with one of these? Are they good writers? Does the quality and workmanship hold up?

 

 

Opinions? Comments? Snide Remarks?

 

 

 

-Kel

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 10
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Kelvandor

    3

  • JDlugosz

    2

  • RevAaron

    2

  • bob_hayden

    1

Top Posters In This Topic

I have been looking at the #233's on I Sell Pens and based on a little digging they appear to be a decent pen. Below are a couple reviews.

 

One here

And one here

Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent.

Isaac Asimov, Salvor Hardin in "Foundation"

US science fiction novelist & scholar (1920 - 1992)

 

There is probably no more terrible instant of enlightenment than the one in which you discover your father is a man--with human flesh.

Frank Herbert, Dune

US science fiction novelist (1920 - 1986)

 

My Pens on Flikr

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I bought a used Wing Sung from an FPN member. I think it's a #237, in orange celluloid. I like it, though it's too fine of a line to be used too often by me. Not that it has much flex, but it does have more flex than any of the Triumph nibs I have used, which somewhat surprised me. I was also surprised at how similar the nib felt to most of the Triumph nibs I've used- consistent but bumpy feedback. Not sure what other qualifier to use, though don't take "bumpy" to mean unsmooth, toothy, scratchy or rough.

WTB: Lamy 27 w/ OB/OBB nibs; Pelikan 100 B nib

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then the Wing Sung nibs are not as rigid as the Triumph nibs were/are noted for?

 

The Wing Sung would interest me greatly if I knew that the nibs are the same framing nails that the Sheaffers' had. I have a need for a FP that will handle single-sheet carbonless copy without worrying about damaging the nib through some pressure. The Triumph or Triumph Manifold sounds perfect, but getting one for the budget I have (rather small) seems to be quite a challenge.

 

 

Mayhaps there are other recommendations? Are there any other pens out there for a low-budget that have a nib of granite and can handle Noodler's?

 

 

...or am I just asking for too much?

 

 

 

-Kel

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do not think you are asking too much. I just checked the ISellPens site and as far as I can see the 233's are still for sale.

My experience: The Wing Sung 233 was one of the first fountain pens I ever owned. I was in school ( in the 1960's) and about 13 years old. I used it for many years. Later there were a Parker 45, a Mont Blanc Monte Rosa, and many after that, but the 233 always stayed with me like an old friend. Now it has been retired for many years already, but before I started to write this reply I dug it up and gave it a try. Dipped it once and: write! Nice fine line.

Stiff as a nail! I do not feel ANY flex, but flex doesn't seem to be you biggest concern...

A rugged, indestructible fountain pen with one of the nicest designs of nibs ever made.

Thanks Sheaffer for the nib design, thanks Parker for the airometric filler (yes you do need an ink pot!), thanks Wing Sung (sub brand of Chinese Hero Pen Factory now) for making it into a low budged pen and finally thanks IsellPens for still having it available for $5,-- only!

Need I say more!

 

Cheers,

 

:eureka: Lexaf :eureka:

 

 

Then the Wing Sung nibs are not as rigid as the Triumph nibs were/are noted for?

 

The Wing Sung would interest me greatly if I knew that the nibs are the same framing nails that the Sheaffers' had. I have a need for a FP that will handle single-sheet carbonless copy without worrying about damaging the nib through some pressure. The Triumph or Triumph Manifold sounds perfect, but getting one for the budget I have (rather small) seems to be quite a challenge.

 

 

Mayhaps there are other recommendations? Are there any other pens out there for a low-budget that have a nib of granite and can handle Noodler's?

 

 

...or am I just asking for too much?

 

 

 

-Kel

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then the Wing Sung nibs are not as rigid as the Triumph nibs were/are noted for?

 

Correct. The Wing Sung has some flex. Not a ton, but an amount common to a lot of 18kt nibs. Doesn't have the corresponding cushion, but the tines widen.

 

The Wing Sung would interest me greatly if I knew that the nibs are the same framing nails that the Sheaffers' had. I have a need for a FP that will handle single-sheet carbonless copy without worrying about damaging the nib through some pressure. The Triumph or Triumph Manifold sounds perfect, but getting one for the budget I have (rather small) seems to be quite a challenge.

 

I'm not sure what your budget is, but you can get Sheaffer's w/ Triumph nibs in the Marketplace for $20-40 pretty frequently. That might be too much, not sure. Put a note in the Want to Buy section, set your dollar amount, and see if anyone has one they want to sell. If you average out the cost of all my Triumph nibbed pens it comes to ~$25.

 

The Hero 200A, or another Hero, might be a great option. Still not really cheap, $25 at ISellPens, but you do get a 14k nib. Don't let the gold content fool you, it's pretty hard. I just gave my mom one, after she mashed up the tines on the once-heavenly cursive italic Kaweco Sport I bought from Pendemonium.

 

Also, the Parker Vector I had for a while had a really stiff, short, semi-hooded nib. Its rigidity might come from the fact that it's conical not unlike the Triumph. If your budget is under $20, you can get one of those for $7-15.

 

Make sure not to let anyone confused your request for really stiff with no flex. Some folks might recommend the Lamy Safari or Pelikano Jr, but steer clear. Neither have flex, but they a really aren't *nails* like the Triumph. A real stiff-as-a-nail nib is one you can't adjust using your fingernails, at least in my mind. :P

 

Aaron

WTB: Lamy 27 w/ OB/OBB nibs; Pelikan 100 B nib

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually, I have a Vector (it's one of only 3 pens I own). I hadn't thought about trying it out to see if it would handle what I needed a nail-nib for. If it does work, then I can at least use it until I save enough to get a proper Sheaffer Triumph. I"ll just have to syringe-fill the carts with ink, as I don't have a converter for it.

 

 

Thanks for the info, folks. I appreciate it :)

 

 

 

-Kel

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Sheaffer for the nib design, thanks Parker for the airometric filler (yes you do need an ink pot!), thanks Wing Sung (sub brand of Chinese Hero Pen Factory now) for making it into a low budged pen and finally thanks IsellPens for still having it available for $5,-- only!

Need I say more!

 

Cheers,

 

:eureka: Lexaf :eureka:

 

i think you summed it up really well there! and yes, kelvandor, i use mine (brown celulloid 237 model) on carbonless (or carbon) copy paper.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I bought two Triumph-style Wing Sungs, and one was just OK and the other was soo poor of a writer that I thought about sending it back. When I started doing nib polishing I got it working acceptably.

 

If it's anything like Hero, the low-end pens are intermittent in bulk. But for $10 or more mail-order I would expect one that works properly. In fact, that was one of the inspirations when I started selling Hero pens with my own QA.

 

--John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a need for a FP that will handle single-sheet carbonless copy without worrying about damaging the nib through some pressure.

 

For Five bucks, it might be OK to wear through the pen eventually. They are indeed good-looking pens. I think the ultra-fine will help apply more presure to the page being a small area. It will be next week before I can dig out mine and check it out for that use (I'm on the road now).

 

--John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 9 years later...

s-l1600.jpg

 

I am torn whether to start a new thread to review the 235. This one is old, and discusses mostly other pens than the 235, but it does appeal to me to have just one thread on the pen, so here goes;-) I owned a 235 long ago and got rid of it. Another arrived just recently. This came as part of a lot of ten old Wing Sung NOS pens from jewelrymathematics on eBay at a cost of about $2.50 per pen. The exterior of the pen is shiny gold color metal with decorative grooves cut into it both longitudinally and circumferentially so the surface looks like graph paper. These grooves create some sparkle which I think was supposed to be eye-catching but to me looks cheap and tinsely. Still, the basic shape is attractive, the spring loaded pocket clip a nice touch for clipping the pen to something thick, and you can find plenty of old WS pens that are much more garish than this. Inside, the nib (somewhere between medium and fine on mine) and section are the commonplace WS take on the Sheaffer Triumph nib. My experience with these is that they tend to be scratchy or gritty, as was my first 235, but the nib on the latest one was fairly smooth to begin with and quite nice (though still with some tooth) after some work with Micro Mesh. Be warned though that the nib material is very stiff and hard. You will not be able to align this with a fingernail and smoothing may take a long time. But the good side of that is that this nib should handle a lot of abuse -- or many carbons. It does show more flex and line width variation than my real Triumph, but it's too stiff to obtain that line variation in normal writing. Appears to be bottle fill only. 15g inked -- amazingly light for a pen with a metal exterior.

 

IF you like a stiff and sturdy nib and can tolerate some tooth then the WS "Triumph:"nib can be a good choice. What pen to get it in may be a matter of taste in exterior design. This one is too flashy for me but others find my preferred 233 to be dull-to-ugly;-)

Edited by bob_hayden
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43844
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      33583
    3. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    4. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      26771
    5. jar
      jar
      26105
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • Shanghai Knife Dude
      I have the Sailor Naginata and some fancy blade nibs coming after 2022 by a number of new workshop from China.  With all my respect, IMHO, they are all (bleep) in doing chinese characters.  Go use a bush, or at least a bush pen. 
    • A Smug Dill
      It is the reason why I'm so keen on the idea of a personal library — of pens, nibs, inks, paper products, etc. — and spent so much money, as well as time and effort, to “build” it for myself (because I can't simply remember everything, especially as I'm getting older fast) and my wife, so that we can “know”; and, instead of just disposing of what displeased us, or even just not good enough to be “given the time of day” against competition from >500 other pens and >500 other inks for our at
    • adamselene
      Agreed.  And I think it’s good to be aware of this early on and think about at the point of buying rather than rationalizing a purchase..
    • A Smug Dill
      Alas, one cannot know “good” without some idea of “bad” against which to contrast; and, as one of my former bosses (back when I was in my twenties) used to say, “on the scale of good to bad…”, it's a spectrum, not a dichotomy. Whereas subjectively acceptable (or tolerable) and unacceptable may well be a dichotomy to someone, and finding whether the threshold or cusp between them lies takes experiencing many degrees of less-than-ideal, especially if the decision is somehow influenced by factors o
    • adamselene
      I got my first real fountain pen on my 60th birthday and many hundreds of pens later I’ve often thought of what I should’ve known in the beginning. I have many pens, the majority of which have some objectionable feature. If they are too delicate, or can’t be posted, or they are too precious to face losing , still they are users, but only in very limited environments..  I have a big disliking for pens that have the cap jump into the air and fly off. I object to Pens that dry out, or leave blobs o
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...