Jump to content

CHALLENGE: How many "Imperials"?


PenHero

Recommended Posts

The Sheaffer Imperial was probably one of the most distinctive pens Sheaffer made. Introduced in 1960, the name has been applied to many, many different pens, both by Sheaffer and by collectors, as some "Imperials" were not called Imperials by Sheaffer.

 

Here's the CHALLENGE:

 

How many different Imperials are there? Can you post a picture of an Imperial that no one else has? Let's see how many people can come up with.

 

A trick question: Which Sheaffer Imperial is *not* an Imperial?

 

Cheers,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 6
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Maja

    2

  • PenHero

    2

  • KendallJ

    1

  • duchour

    1

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

A trick question:  Which Sheaffer Imperial is *not* an Imperial?

The one with the "Dolphin" inlaid nib?

 

How many different Imperials are there?

 

Hmmm, well there were 8 types of early Imperials (mark I through VIII), then a Sterling Silver version, the "Triumph" Imperial, the special edition "Holly" pen from 1996, and lastly the modern Imperial design with the chrome clip and cap band. I don't know if the original Legacy is considered an Imperial, though (it does have the squared barrel ends which (all???) Imperials have).

 

Can you post a picture of an Imperial that no one else has?  Let's see how many people can come up with.

I own a 1996 Special Edition "Holly" fountain pen:

http://www.pensplanet.com/cgi-bin/shop.pl/...sheaffer-le.htm

 

(I own an Imperial FP with the 'diamond' engraved design)

Edited by Maja
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 12 years later...

Wow, I forgot about this thread. The Imperial that is not an Imperial is the Target, introduced in June, 1960. In the 1961 catalog, Sheaffer changed the name and added it to the new Imperial lineup as the Imperial III. The only way to distinguish them is by chalk marks.

 

post-225-0-06441200-1511613862.jpeg

 

Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, I forgot about this thread. The Imperial that is not an Imperial is the Target, introduced in June, 1960. In the 1961 catalog, Sheaffer changed the name and added it to the new Imperial lineup as the Imperial III. The only way to distinguish them is by chalk marks.

 

attachicon.gif21B42BFA-4357-4650-BFEF-555EDFA7B752.jpeg

 

Thanks!

I love the distinction. Desk bases from 1935 and 1936 have a similar problem in that many models are carried in both years though the numbering system is radically changed. Only way to know is from an original sticker on the bottom of the set.

 

Roger W.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43844
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      33558
    3. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    4. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      26730
    5. jar
      jar
      26101
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • Shanghai Knife Dude
      I have the Sailor Naginata and some fancy blade nibs coming after 2022 by a number of new workshop from China.  With all my respect, IMHO, they are all (bleep) in doing chinese characters.  Go use a bush, or at least a bush pen. 
    • A Smug Dill
      It is the reason why I'm so keen on the idea of a personal library — of pens, nibs, inks, paper products, etc. — and spent so much money, as well as time and effort, to “build” it for myself (because I can't simply remember everything, especially as I'm getting older fast) and my wife, so that we can “know”; and, instead of just disposing of what displeased us, or even just not good enough to be “given the time of day” against competition from >500 other pens and >500 other inks for our at
    • adamselene
      Agreed.  And I think it’s good to be aware of this early on and think about at the point of buying rather than rationalizing a purchase..
    • A Smug Dill
      Alas, one cannot know “good” without some idea of “bad” against which to contrast; and, as one of my former bosses (back when I was in my twenties) used to say, “on the scale of good to bad…”, it's a spectrum, not a dichotomy. Whereas subjectively acceptable (or tolerable) and unacceptable may well be a dichotomy to someone, and finding whether the threshold or cusp between them lies takes experiencing many degrees of less-than-ideal, especially if the decision is somehow influenced by factors o
    • adamselene
      I got my first real fountain pen on my 60th birthday and many hundreds of pens later I’ve often thought of what I should’ve known in the beginning. I have many pens, the majority of which have some objectionable feature. If they are too delicate, or can’t be posted, or they are too precious to face losing , still they are users, but only in very limited environments..  I have a big disliking for pens that have the cap jump into the air and fly off. I object to Pens that dry out, or leave blobs o
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...