Jump to content

Visconti Push-Pull Filler


JFT

Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

I was wondering if the Push-Pull filling system from Visconti is made to be used "regularly". I mean is this a gadget filling system or is it a rugged and efficient one?

 

There has been some disussion where their double reservoir power filler had some issues. I do not recall seeing anybody comment on the Push-Pull so I was wondering if it was because they were too rare, gadget to look only or simply very effective and rugged?

 

Thanks.

 

Lamy AL-star - 1.1 (Omas Violet)

Nakaya Celluloid Mottishaw F Flex (PR Arabian Rose)

Omas Bologna - M (Noodler's Golden Brown)

Pelikan M620 Grand Place - Binder XF/XXF Flex (Noodler's Navajo Turquoise)

Stipula 22 - 0.9 (Waterman Florida Blue)

Waterman Patrician - M (Waterman Florida Blue)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 22
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • JFT

    4

  • Deirdre

    3

  • gmberg

    2

  • QM2

    2

Top Posters In This Topic

... is this a gadget filling system or is it a rugged and efficient one?

I think it's a gadget, an answer to a question no one was asking. But so what? I bought it because of its very gadgetness, even if it does weigh too much. Nice nib out of the box, too.

 

Fred

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Plunger fillers have been around for a long time. It works and works well, though I've only had one for a few months.

deirdre.net

"Heck we fed a thousand dollar pen to a chicken because we could." -- FarmBoy, about Pen Posse

Link to comment
Share on other sites

... is this a gadget filling system or is it a rugged and efficient one?

I think it's a gadget, an answer to a question no one was asking. But so what? I bought it because of its very gadgetness, even if it does weigh too much. Nice nib out of the box, too.

 

Fred

 

I buy pen to write not to store them and look at them once in a while in my collection list :D I have nothing against the gadgetness of the filling mechanism (I find it pretty cool actually) as long as it is made and designed to be used extensively ;)

 

Plunger fillers have been around for a long time. It works and works well, though I've only had one for a few months.

 

Thank you Deirdre I was not aware that it was an old filling method :)

 

So I have one week to decide between the Arco and the Divina! (The Etruria will follow assuredly within a few months :thumbup:)

Lamy AL-star - 1.1 (Omas Violet)

Nakaya Celluloid Mottishaw F Flex (PR Arabian Rose)

Omas Bologna - M (Noodler's Golden Brown)

Pelikan M620 Grand Place - Binder XF/XXF Flex (Noodler's Navajo Turquoise)

Stipula 22 - 0.9 (Waterman Florida Blue)

Waterman Patrician - M (Waterman Florida Blue)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Plunger fillers have been around for a long time. It works and works well, though I've only had one for a few months.

 

Thank you Deirdre I was not aware that it was an old filling method :)

Parker Vacumatics (which date to the 30s) have plunger fillers, though the Visconti isn't the same as a Vac as far as I know.

 

I also have a Stipula plunger filler.

deirdre.net

"Heck we fed a thousand dollar pen to a chicken because we could." -- FarmBoy, about Pen Posse

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Parker Vacumatics (which date to the 30s) have plunger fillers, though the Visconti isn't the same as a Vac as far as I know.

 

I also have a Stipula plunger filler.

 

Yet another Doh! moment for me;I now realize I never understood correctly was Vacumatics meant! I thought it was some kind of osmose filler... :embarrassed_smile:

 

I've read the expression so many times and assumed I knew :lol: Ok yes it is definitively a proven one!

Lamy AL-star - 1.1 (Omas Violet)

Nakaya Celluloid Mottishaw F Flex (PR Arabian Rose)

Omas Bologna - M (Noodler's Golden Brown)

Pelikan M620 Grand Place - Binder XF/XXF Flex (Noodler's Navajo Turquoise)

Stipula 22 - 0.9 (Waterman Florida Blue)

Waterman Patrician - M (Waterman Florida Blue)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I forgot to ask, how are Pull-Push when it's time to clean them? Are they troublesome like it has been reported for the double reservoir power filler? Do you (Can you) remove the nibs to do a better cleaning job?

Lamy AL-star - 1.1 (Omas Violet)

Nakaya Celluloid Mottishaw F Flex (PR Arabian Rose)

Omas Bologna - M (Noodler's Golden Brown)

Pelikan M620 Grand Place - Binder XF/XXF Flex (Noodler's Navajo Turquoise)

Stipula 22 - 0.9 (Waterman Florida Blue)

Waterman Patrician - M (Waterman Florida Blue)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Plunger fillers have been around for a long time. It works and works well, though I've only had one for a few months.

 

Thank you Deirdre I was not aware that it was an old filling method :)

Parker Vacumatics (which date to the 30s) have plunger fillers, though the Visconti isn't the same as a Vac as far as I know.

 

I also have a Stipula plunger filler.

Hi,

 

Although plunger fillers were in common use in the 1930s, the Vacumatic is not a plunger filler per se. While the Vacumatic does indeed have a plunger which is depressed in order to fill, the plunger acts on a rubber diaphragm, and releasing the spring-loaded plunger allows the pen to fill. The push-and-release process must be repeated several times - Parker instructions recommended ten times, I believe - for the pen to fill completely.

 

"Plunger" fillers, as that term is commonly used, require only a single downward push of the plunger; and the pen fills when the plunger releases the barrel vacuum as it completes its downward travel. The most prominent companies associated with vintage plunger fillers are Sheaffer and Wahl. The Sheaffer Snorkel and Touchdown systems also used plungers...without being "plunger" fillers. And speaking of Touchdowns: is Visconti's use of the term "push and pull touchdown" intended to suggest a kinship with the pneumatic Sheaffer system - or is the Divina's system a variant of the power-filler?

 

Cheers,

 

Jon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Although plunger fillers were in common use in the 1930s, the Vacumatic is not a plunger filler per se.

 

[...]

 

"Plunger" fillers, as that term is commonly used, require only a single downward push of the plunger; and the pen fills when the plunger releases the barrel vacuum as it completes its downward travel. The most prominent companies associated with vintage plunger fillers are Sheaffer and Wahl. The Sheaffer Snorkel and Touchdown systems also used plungers...without being "plunger" fillers. And speaking of Touchdowns: is Visconti's use of the term "push and pull touchdown" intended to suggest a kinship with the pneumatic Sheaffer system - or is the Divina's system a variant of the power-filler?

All of the above are good points, but I don't know enough about Visconti's system (or historic filling systems) for the Divina vs. the Sheaffers, but I think it's pretty similar.

 

My main point, though, was that plunger fillers have been around in various forms. I'm not sure if the Stipula Suprema Nuda filler directly translates to anything historical, but it's also a plunger filler.

deirdre.net

"Heck we fed a thousand dollar pen to a chicken because we could." -- FarmBoy, about Pen Posse

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I have a question about cleaning visconti's system. When I've changed ink it has been diffcult to get all the water out of the pen. Is there a better way to clean this type of filler system?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you go back in the threads, you'll find some folks take the feeds out. I just keep working the plunger until it seems fairly clear of water. As saturated as most inks are these days, it doesn't seem to affect the color or performance any. That being said, I don't store my pens for long periods of time as they're users, so I can't speak to the long term effects of leaving a little moisture in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a question about cleaning visconti's system. When I've changed ink it has been diffcult to get all the water out of the pen. Is there a better way to clean this type of filler system?

Unscrew the nib from the section and you have complete access to the inside of the pen. Cleaning it couldn't be easier. I flush mine, dry it with tissue and then re-fill.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The plunger-filler system was patented by Sheaffer in 1933-1934 and then went on to have glorious 15 year career. When properly restored, they are (I believe) the most efficient use of a pen barrel for storing ink (EDs hold more ink, but lose the contest because they require more work to fill).

While at the DC Show, I had a look at the new Visconti plunger-filler and was fascinated by it. Unfortunately, I did not have the bucks to buy one, test it, and take it apart. I did notice, however, that its plunger uses a configuration that differs from the vintage Sheaffer version. Sheaffer attached a flexible washer on the end of the piston, while the new Visconti uses an o-ring attached to a plastic cylinder. I have read recently of a device designed by Francis Goosens of Belgium that also uses an o-ring.

 

Question: when you fill your Visconti plunger-filler, about what proportion of the barrel fills with ink? The ones that were on display had fairly transparant barrels, and I wish I had seen one fill.

Cheers,

Gerry Berg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.pensinasia.com/vitamahver11.jpg

 

Well, the "power vacuum filler" pumps ink directly into the barrel by creating a vacuum via the back-and-forth pumping motion. The descriptions say that the pen fills on the downstroke, and I am still not sure about the physics of that. But this filling system is supposed to have enormous ink capacity, especially in pens with large barrels such as the Taj Mahal. So it seems to be more than about just gimmicks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

The plunger-vac filler was a George Sweetser invention, which later went into the De La Rue's "Onoto" model in 1905. Sheaffer patented it later for the Balance model, redesigning that flippy seal, as mentioned, I think in the mid 1930s. The Pilot 823 filler derives straight from the Onoto model. And these Visconti "Power Fillers" are of virtually the same design. There's some graphic demos on the Visconti site of the pens filling, with directions etc: http://www.visconti.it/tecnica.html Under "Use and Maintenance" they've got the fillers listed. Click and it takes you through a fill. However, nothing like using one of these yourself. As the plunger is pressed, the head pulls away from the chamber behind it, causing a vacuum (suction) until it hits a wider part of the chamber infront of it and breaks the seal. The ink is then sucked back into the chamber behind the plunger. A very clever and robust type of self-filler that draws a lot of ink. Amazing that we don't see more of it. Not quite as sturdy as a piston filler, but hey, at least no sac, and no (expletive deleted) cartridge converter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm starting to think of the idea that plunger fillers hold more ink is a bit of a myth. At least, with all of the vac-fil/plunger fil type pens I've used, none of them hold more ink than a piston filler or lever filler. They all hold more ink than a c/c, but that's easy to do. The Sheaffer Triumph Vac-Fil I have holds 1.1 mL, about the same as a lever filler Sheaffer I have. My Conklin Nozac piston filler holds 1.5 mL whilst my Conklin Glider lever fill holds a whopping 2 mL! Even the Pilot 823, which someone was awesome enough to lend me for a week, holds "only" 1.5 mL of ink. And it's a *big* pen. A good quantity, to be sure, but it doesn't beat out your average piston filler- even smaller piston fillers can hold 1.2-1.6 mL of ink.

 

I think Vac-Fils are awesome, and the modern ones are way more durable than people give them credit for- but they don't hold that much more ink than a piston filler.

 

As far as the Vacumatic and a plunger filler both being vacuum fillers- I don't think it's good to treat them as the same kind of filler. In the end, all filling systems are "vacuum fillers," except eyedropper and c/c pens. I guess you could call Vacumatics incremental vacuum fillers, plunger fillers = acute vacuum fillers, piston fillers = constant liner vacuum fillers, sac fillers = shape reformation vacuum fillers, etc. Or something like that. :P

 

Aaron

WTB: Lamy 27 w/ OB/OBB nibs; Pelikan 100 B nib

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I've now been using the Push-Pull Filler in my Visconti Taj Mahal for a bit. It is a sturdy, practical, reliable system that seems similar to the Parker vac. It is easy to use and holds a lot of ink. I have nothing negative to say about this filling system so far.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm starting to think of the idea that plunger fillers hold more ink is a bit of a myth. At least, with all of the vac-fil/plunger fil type pens I've used, none of them hold more ink than a piston filler or lever filler. They all hold more ink than a c/c, but that's easy to do. The Sheaffer Triumph Vac-Fil I have holds 1.1 mL, about the same as a lever filler Sheaffer I have. My Conklin Nozac piston filler holds 1.5 mL whilst my Conklin Glider lever fill holds a whopping 2 mL! Even the Pilot 823, which someone was awesome enough to lend me for a week, holds "only" 1.5 mL of ink. And it's a *big* pen. A good quantity, to be sure, but it doesn't beat out your average piston filler- even smaller piston fillers can hold 1.2-1.6 mL of ink.

 

Hi Aaron:

The typical Sheaffer Triumph pluinger-filler (1940s) as I restore them hold anywhere from 1.4 to 2.2 ml. depending on the model. Even the small Tuckaway (the earlier model that uses the entire barrel) holds 1.2 ml. When you consider that these and the Triumphs are not large pens, you get some idea of the system's efficiency. True, there are pens that hold more ink (giant Japanese eye droppers!) but FOR THEIR SIZE, a Sheaffer plunger-filler is unmatched.

 

Now when you go back to the 1930s, you get really large capacities. The typical late 1930s Over Size Balance plunger-filler holds a whopping 3.0 ml, more than the largest modern Mont Blanc! The 1934 oversize Sheaffer WASP plunger-filler is only 5 1/8" long (capped) and yet it holds 3.0 ml.

 

Gerry

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43844
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      33494
    3. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    4. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      26624
    5. jar
      jar
      26101
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • Shanghai Knife Dude
      I have the Sailor Naginata and some fancy blade nibs coming after 2022 by a number of new workshop from China.  With all my respect, IMHO, they are all (bleep) in doing chinese characters.  Go use a bush, or at least a bush pen. 
    • A Smug Dill
      It is the reason why I'm so keen on the idea of a personal library — of pens, nibs, inks, paper products, etc. — and spent so much money, as well as time and effort, to “build” it for myself (because I can't simply remember everything, especially as I'm getting older fast) and my wife, so that we can “know”; and, instead of just disposing of what displeased us, or even just not good enough to be “given the time of day” against competition from >500 other pens and >500 other inks for our at
    • adamselene
      Agreed.  And I think it’s good to be aware of this early on and think about at the point of buying rather than rationalizing a purchase..
    • A Smug Dill
      Alas, one cannot know “good” without some idea of “bad” against which to contrast; and, as one of my former bosses (back when I was in my twenties) used to say, “on the scale of good to bad…”, it's a spectrum, not a dichotomy. Whereas subjectively acceptable (or tolerable) and unacceptable may well be a dichotomy to someone, and finding whether the threshold or cusp between them lies takes experiencing many degrees of less-than-ideal, especially if the decision is somehow influenced by factors o
    • adamselene
      I got my first real fountain pen on my 60th birthday and many hundreds of pens later I’ve often thought of what I should’ve known in the beginning. I have many pens, the majority of which have some objectionable feature. If they are too delicate, or can’t be posted, or they are too precious to face losing , still they are users, but only in very limited environments..  I have a big disliking for pens that have the cap jump into the air and fly off. I object to Pens that dry out, or leave blobs o
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...