|***** The FPN Admin Team *****|
FPN Quick Navigation
- Our New FPN 2015 LE Pen!
- - FPN Blue Pearl Celebration LE
- FPN Forums & Forum Categories
- - FPN News forum
- - The Mall forum
- - FPN World forums
- - The Marketplace Forums
- - Writing Instruments forums
- - Brand Focus forums
- - Regional Focus forums
- - Inks, Inc. forums
- - Paper, & Pen Acc. forums
- - Creative Expressions forums
- FPN Store, Donations, Accounts & Advertising
- - Store Home
- - FPN Ink Store
- - Advertise on FPN - Info
- - FPN Marketing & Advertising
- - Variable Amount Donations - Iridium, Rhodium & Platinum
- - Fixed Amount FPN Rhodium & Platinum Supporters, & FPN without Ads Donations
- - Premium (Trader/Retailer) Accounts
- - Straight PayPal Anonymous Donations
- - FPN Without Ads Donation, Annual Subscription
- - FPN Without Ads Donation, Monthly Subscription
- - The FPN Café Press Shop
- FPN Apps & Modules
- - Blogs
- - Classifieds
- - Gallery
- - Downloads
- - Home Page
- - Members
- - Pen Events Calendar
- - FPN's RSS Feeds
- - Shoutbox
- - Upload
- - Classifieds: Browsing
- - Classifieds: Creation
- - Classifieds: Questions & Answers
- - Upload: How-to
- Rules & Guidelines
- - FPN Rules, Guidelines, TOU
- - Classifieds Rules
- - Premium Accounts: Rules
- - Market Watch Rules
Parker Duofold International size comaprison
Posted 07 December 2005 - 23:14
Posted 08 December 2005 - 19:16
The Duofold International has about the same pength as the M-600, but is closer to the M-400 in barrel and cap diameter. The International and M-600 nibs are about the same size. If you like a pen the size of an M-600, the International might do, but the difference in diameter is very noticeable to me. I tend to think of the International as an M-400 size pen with an M-600 size nib.
I hope this information is helpful.
Posted 09 December 2005 - 03:55
Posted 09 December 2005 - 08:47
I've only managed to read this thread so I'm not sure if my post will be of anymore use to you.
I have both the M805 and the Platinum Duofold (which only comes in the International size, unfortunately - for me too).
Before I continue, I concur with everything that FrankB (above) says, from my experience.
I fully agree with you on the classiness of this Duofold which I'm hoping Parker will eventually make in the Centennial size (I have a soft spot for black and silver/chrome/platinum finishes). However, I found the International dimensions to be somehow uncomfortable for me. I found the combination of the shape of the pen (the section is juuuust a bit too thin for me - as wide as an M200's section would have been perfect for me) and it's weight (quite hefty for its size, I feel) just did not work for my hands - I get cramps before I even finish writing a page. The nib however is quite magnificent. Super smooth, the fine nib that I have is almost as broad as the Pelikan's fine, so it's an acceptable width for my handwriting.
The M805 is more comfortable for me between the two - I have yet to try a Centennial for a decent length of time i.e. other than trying one at a shop. But it is indeed bigger in size than the Platinum Duofold. However, if I remember correctly, I found that in terms of weight, I couldn't really tell either apart. No doubt, you would assume that the M805 is heavier (and I'm sure it probably is) but I can't confirm this as I don't have a suitable weight scale.
I hope the Duofold works out for you, and if it does, I'll be jealous. I was really hoping that it would feel right for me. Oh well, I'll just keep praying for a platinum Centennial then.
You can't always get what you want... but if you try sometimes... you just might find... you'll get what you need...
Posted 09 December 2005 - 21:11
Here are a couple of photos that might be helpful. They are of my Parker Duofold International and my Pelikan m605.
Capped and uncapped:
And posted, (note that the Parker's cap sits much higher than the Pel's):
They are similar in weight, though the Parker feels slightly heavier, particularly when posted. In regards to width, the Parker is slightly narrower at the section. I pulled out the ol' calipers and measured the sections of the two pens. At the narrowest point, the Parker is about 9 mm in diameter, while the Pelikan is almost 10 mm. The Parker has a slightly longer "gripping surface", i.e. the threads are up higher. The Pelikan gets wider quicker, so if you are someone who grips the pen up higher on the section, the Pelikan will feel even wider, compared to the Parker.
Hope that was helpful. I'm a small-handed guy, so I'm very comfortable with both of those pens.
Have fun with your new acquisition.
Edited by TMann, 09 December 2005 - 21:19.
Posted 09 December 2005 - 21:40
The very short grip section design is my only objection to Pelikan pens, but it is a very big one. It is also the actual reason why the M200 feels awkward and small in so many hands, when in reality it is not that tiny of a pen. This is a shame, as Pelikans are otherwise great pens. Pelikan should redesign their pens to put the threads above the ink window. It should also make the threads less sharp. Parkers, Sheaffers, and Watermans usually don't have this problem. I don't understand why so many modern manufacturers insist on putting deep steps or sharp threads so low in the grip section.
Posted 09 December 2005 - 22:18
I would guess that the typical person who is used to writing with a ballpoint pen or pencil, probably grips their pen down pretty low, as opposed to the typical fountain pen user, who grips their pen up higher.
I don't understand why so many modern manufacturers insist on putting deep steps or sharp threads so low in the grip section.
Just a guess...