Jump to content

Low-smudge mechanical pencil "leads"


Goodwhiskers

Recommended Posts

Marks and words by most wood-cased (and recycled sawdust/paper-cased) HB (Number 2) pencils, which must be sharpened, do not smudge very much.

 

Marks and words by most twist-advancing and click-advancing mechanical pencils I've tried (0.5 mm, 0.7 mm and 0.9 mm) smudge really easily. I've tried a few different brands of leads, in HB and H grades. All of those leads have been "hi-polymer" or "high-polymer." The H grade smudges less, but it's too light for my taste in these widths. My favorite width in these pencils is 0.9 mm.

 

I have felt two advantages of "hi-polymer:" smooth writing and enough flexibility to prevent most breakage.

 

The high smudging of "hi-polymer," though, has been disappointing.

 

I haven't tried "clutch" mechanical pencils enough to find out whether any low-smudging leads for them are easily available in the USA.

 

Are low-smudging leads for mechanical pencils available?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 15
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Goodwhiskers

    7

  • Bernie0104

    2

  • Splicer

    1

  • atmydesk

    1

I am wrong to think that HB is softer than a #2 pencil. If memory serves me correctly, you want 2H to equal a #2. You were right that HB is like a #2. Regardless, you may want to seek out 3H 4H or 5H leads.

 

"Clutch" type lead holders can work, but I've had a hard time finding leads for those that aren't soft.

 

I'm having the best success lately with 2H 0.3mm leads. Of course, you'd need a 0.3mm mechanical pencil. They're not impossible to find, but they aren't all that common.

 

[Edits in bold or strikeout]

Edited by Splicer

Who are the pen shops in your neighborhood? Find out or tell us where they are, at http://penshops.info/

Blog: http://splicer.com/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Splicer, thanks for your useful remarks.

 

I must confess I've tried H grade leads in the 0.5 mm width only. I'll try H and 2H in the 0.9 mm width. :hmm1:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have you tried Caran D'Ache pencil leads? I recently saw a review of these leads on davesmechanicalpencils.com, and one of the characteristics mentioned was their resistance to smearing. Dave's site is worth checking out if you use mechanical pencils a lot.

 

Bernie

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a .3 mechanical pencil around somewhere. It was my first push-type mechanical pencil, bought 30 yrs ago when I didn't know much. My boss picked it up from my desk and wrote a bit with it and said "It's like writing with a pin!" It's great if you need to squeeze a word into a small space, but generally the lead breaks too often for everyday writing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have you tried Caran D'Ache pencil leads? I recently saw a review of these leads on davesmechanicalpencils.com, and one of the characteristics mentioned was their resistance to smearing. Dave's site is worth checking out if you use mechanical pencils a lot.

 

I use a Caran d'Ache Ecridor Retro pencil with Caran d'Ache led; no smearing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have you tried Caran D'Ache pencil leads? I recently saw a review of these leads on davesmechanicalpencils.com, and one of the characteristics mentioned was their resistance to smearing. Dave's site is worth checking out if you use mechanical pencils a lot.

 

Bernie

Thanks, Bernie!

 

That's an excellent blog. The URL is

 

http://davesmechanicalpencils.blogspot.com/

 

Enjoy!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The "Lead Cup" comparison tests of 0.5 mm HB lead from 16 manufacturers are entertaining and informative! They start on

 

http://dmporganiser.blogspot.com/2006/10/leads.html

 

Re-examining the stats from the angle of smear resistance, I got the following "fantasy league" winners: Montblanc, Faber-Castell and the Korean brand Insung Hands.

 

The high scorers in smear resistance in the opening rounds were

Montblanc (against Caran d'Ache, Cross and Micro),

Pentel (tied with Parker against Staedler and Students Choice),

Parker (tied with Pentel against Staedler and Students Choice),

Faber-Castell (against Rotring, Zebra and Waterman),

and Insung Hands (against Lamy, Papermate and Pilot).

 

Montblanc showed itself very erasable, interestingly enough. It failed to advance from the first round on blackness and strength. Caran d'Ache was the overall winner of that round, and it went on to second place in the tournament, actually beating Pentel in smear resistance while losing in blackness, erasability and strength.

 

Parker and Pentel tied in both smear resistance (top in their round) and erasability (second place). Parker failed to advance from the first round on blackness and strength. Pentel went on to the championship, losing to Caran d'Ache in smear resistance only.

 

Since Montblanc beat Caran d'Ache in smear resistance, and Caran d'Ache beat Pentel there, Montblanc beats Pentel there too (assuming Dave's test methods were consistent).

 

Faber-Castell was tops in its opening round in both smear resistance and erasability. It placed last in its opening round on blackness and strength.

 

Insung Hands was tops in its opening round on smear resistance but not erasability. It placed last in its opening round on erasability, blackness and strength.

 

Faber-Castell and Insung Hands never competed against each other or against Montblanc, so I suppose I could run a match myself. Stay tuned :) .

Edited by Goodwhiskers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a .3 mechanical pencil around somewhere. It was my first push-type mechanical pencil, bought 30 yrs ago when I didn't know much. My boss picked it up from my desk and wrote a bit with it and said "It's like writing with a pin!" It's great if you need to squeeze a word into a small space, but generally the lead breaks too often for everyday writing.

 

I used .3mm pencils every day during law school - writing all my notes in the margins of the books.

 

EDIT: I left my book in class one day. The next day the prof held it up and send, "Someone left this book in here; there is no name but there is some really tiny writing in here."

 

Funny, I was not in class that day, but my friends claimed it for me - they did not even have to ask!

Edited by jmkeuning

Fool: One who subverts convention or orthodoxy or varies from social conformity in order to reveal spiritual or moral truth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I used .3mm pencils every day during law school - writing all my notes in the margins of the books.

 

EDIT: I left my book in class one day. The next day the prof held it up and send, "Someone left this book in here; there is no name but there is some really tiny writing in here."

 

Funny, I was not in class that day, but my friends claimed it for me - they did not even have to ask!

:D

Levenger used to sell a fancy 0.3 mm mechanical pencil from Faber-Castell (with a spring in the barrel to allow more flexibility to prevent breakage), advertising it for just the purpose James put his pencils to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is a summary of another point from Dave's Mechanical Pencils, on this page, related to my comment at the start about wooden pencils vs. mechanical pencils:

 

Most woodcase pencils have leads made of graphite, wax and clay, with the clay holding it all together. From the clay part, Dave (and others in the field?) calls them "ceramic leads." This is the older lead recipe. Dave says that the clay was replaced by polymer materials for narrower mechanical pencils in order to make the leads more break-resistant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hate pencil smudging! In a previous job, most of the work was doen by pencil. I long ago decided that a Scripto pen suited me--it was not push-button, but twist. I fortunately bought out the stock of a couple of stores before the pencil was discontinued years ago (although they're mechanical pencils, they do eventually wear out).

 

To go with it, I found that Sheaffer .9mm lead worked best, preferably Type F. Again these are old, they come in the neat yellow "coffins". I hadn't been able to buy these in a long time--since everyday stationery stores disppeared, but scored a boxful on Ebay a couple of years ago :cloud9: I found that the lead was not too soft, not too hard, and I could write quickly as is my habit, with no smudging. These might still be available on Ebay if if have a suitable pencil and interest.

 

Thanks for the interesting information in this thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have you tried Caran D'Ache pencil leads? I recently saw a review of these leads on davesmechanicalpencils.com, and one of the characteristics mentioned was their resistance to smearing. Dave's site is worth checking out if you use mechanical pencils a lot.

 

Bernie

Thanks, Bernie!

 

That's an excellent blog. The URL is

 

http://davesmechanicalpencils.blogspot.com/

 

Enjoy!

 

Glad to be of assistance! I see you are enjoying Dave's site... I hope you find your perfect smear free lead. Keep us posted!

 

Bernie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hate pencil smudging! In a previous job, most of the work was doen by pencil. I long ago decided that a Scripto pen suited me--it was not push-button, but twist. I fortunately bought out the stock of a couple of stores before the pencil was discontinued years ago (although they're mechanical pencils, they do eventually wear out).

 

To go with it, I found that Sheaffer .9mm lead worked best, preferably Type F. Again these are old, they come in the neat yellow "coffins". I hadn't been able to buy these in a long time--since everyday stationery stores disppeared, but scored a boxful on Ebay a couple of years ago :cloud9: I found that the lead was not too soft, not too hard, and I could write quickly as is my habit, with no smudging. These might still be available on Ebay if if have a suitable pencil and interest.

 

Thanks for the interesting information in this thread.

Pendemonium has them, I am just a satified customer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I decided to try a Staedtler Mars Technico 780 C clutch-type leadholder, which holds 2-mm leads. Of course it came with one Staedtler Mars Carbon HB 2-mm lead, which according to the technical sales document is a "ceramic" lead (clay, wax and graphite, as in the leads for woodcase pencils), not a "high-polymer" lead (coked thread, wax and graphite, as in the 1.2-mm and thinner leads for click-advance pencils). I just tested the lead for smudging on a very smooth-surface paper, and I was pleased to confirm that this lead is just like the lead in woodcase pencils: very smudge-resistant, even in HB hardness! :cloud9:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with Caran d'Ache leads. They hardly smudge. Avoid Staedtler high polymer (lumograph) leads. Also the Faber Castell 2mm leads I bought are quite good.

However with Caran d'Ache you don't get a "strong black" when you write, only if you use very soft leads like 2B or 3B but you get some "smudging" with them

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43844
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      33559
    3. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    4. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      26743
    5. jar
      jar
      26101
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • Shanghai Knife Dude
      I have the Sailor Naginata and some fancy blade nibs coming after 2022 by a number of new workshop from China.  With all my respect, IMHO, they are all (bleep) in doing chinese characters.  Go use a bush, or at least a bush pen. 
    • A Smug Dill
      It is the reason why I'm so keen on the idea of a personal library — of pens, nibs, inks, paper products, etc. — and spent so much money, as well as time and effort, to “build” it for myself (because I can't simply remember everything, especially as I'm getting older fast) and my wife, so that we can “know”; and, instead of just disposing of what displeased us, or even just not good enough to be “given the time of day” against competition from >500 other pens and >500 other inks for our at
    • adamselene
      Agreed.  And I think it’s good to be aware of this early on and think about at the point of buying rather than rationalizing a purchase..
    • A Smug Dill
      Alas, one cannot know “good” without some idea of “bad” against which to contrast; and, as one of my former bosses (back when I was in my twenties) used to say, “on the scale of good to bad…”, it's a spectrum, not a dichotomy. Whereas subjectively acceptable (or tolerable) and unacceptable may well be a dichotomy to someone, and finding whether the threshold or cusp between them lies takes experiencing many degrees of less-than-ideal, especially if the decision is somehow influenced by factors o
    • adamselene
      I got my first real fountain pen on my 60th birthday and many hundreds of pens later I’ve often thought of what I should’ve known in the beginning. I have many pens, the majority of which have some objectionable feature. If they are too delicate, or can’t be posted, or they are too precious to face losing , still they are users, but only in very limited environments..  I have a big disliking for pens that have the cap jump into the air and fly off. I object to Pens that dry out, or leave blobs o
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...