Jump to content

Parker51 Desk Pen


corgicoupe

Recommended Posts

I was looking at the Parker51 dot com site in an attempt to ID a Parker 51 desk pen that I acquired a few years ago. It shows two pens, only one of which can be my pen:

My pen has an 8 date code [no dots], and the aerometric filler says press 6 times, which I think places it in the 1940s since my 1950 [date code 50] Parker 51 says press 4 times. However, my pen looks more like the shape of the lower pen in the photo on the Parker "51" web site, which the site says is from the 1950s. My pen is exactly 6" long. Which pen do you folks think I have?

 

 

fpn_1600613985__parker51_desk_pen.jpg

Edited by corgicoupe

Baptiste knew how to make a short job long

For love of it. And yet not waste time either.

Robert Frost

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 9
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • joss

    4

  • pajaro

    3

  • corgicoupe

    3

Somewhere, packed for moving, I have a pen that looks like the one in that picture, and ir has an "8." code. 1948 third quarter for mine. It is possible that the barrel was changed, of course, but I believe the "press 6 times filler sheath is 48 0r 49, but I can't claim to be an authority. I'm not sure about 1950. I think my 1950 pens had "press 4 times."

 

I collected "8" date codes with however many or no dots. I was born in 48. There are small caches of 51s around the house, though.

"Don't hurry, don't worry. It's better to be late at the Golden Gate than to arrive in Hell on time."
--Sign in a bar and grill, Ormond Beach, Florida, 1960.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The "press 6 times" Aerometric filler is correct indeed for an early (1948-49) Parker 51 Aerometric.

 

When looking at the picture on Parker51.com, I think that your pen rather looks like the top pen with stump taper rather than the bottom pen with a slightly longer taper that is slimmer at the top.

 

P51 Aero desk pen barrels can be switched but the design of the taper changed slightly from 1953 onwards when a golden top cone was added (as seen on the rare P51 blue desk pen that is also shown at Parker51.com).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah. I wish there had been a length measurement on those two pens. Ernesto [Parker "51"] wrote to say that my pen was indeed a 1948, and that perhaps the longer tail may have appeared earlier than the 1950s.

Baptiste knew how to make a short job long

For love of it. And yet not waste time either.

Robert Frost

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting. Does the filler sleeve say Press 4 times or 6 times?

Baptiste knew how to make a short job long

For love of it. And yet not waste time either.

Robert Frost

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I have a mark III desk pen with one of the tapers that has a golden or brass nob at the top, the standard nob. Do you think someone changed this taper out?

"Don't hurry, don't worry. It's better to be late at the Golden Gate than to arrive in Hell on time."
--Sign in a bar and grill, Ormond Beach, Florida, 1960.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a mark III desk pen with one of the tapers that has a golden or brass nob at the top, the standard nob. Do you think someone changed this taper out?

A picture might be helpful but a taper with gold top is correct for all Parker 51 desk pens that are later than 1953.

 

What you call Mark III is likely the version with the narrow P61-type clutch ring? This version appeared circa 1959. Is the Aerometric filler of your pen marked "Parker 51" or simply "Parker"?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Narrow clutch ring. Filler marked "Parker."

"Don't hurry, don't worry. It's better to be late at the Golden Gate than to arrive in Hell on time."
--Sign in a bar and grill, Ormond Beach, Florida, 1960.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43844
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      33577
    3. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    4. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      26766
    5. jar
      jar
      26105
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • Shanghai Knife Dude
      I have the Sailor Naginata and some fancy blade nibs coming after 2022 by a number of new workshop from China.  With all my respect, IMHO, they are all (bleep) in doing chinese characters.  Go use a bush, or at least a bush pen. 
    • A Smug Dill
      It is the reason why I'm so keen on the idea of a personal library — of pens, nibs, inks, paper products, etc. — and spent so much money, as well as time and effort, to “build” it for myself (because I can't simply remember everything, especially as I'm getting older fast) and my wife, so that we can “know”; and, instead of just disposing of what displeased us, or even just not good enough to be “given the time of day” against competition from >500 other pens and >500 other inks for our at
    • adamselene
      Agreed.  And I think it’s good to be aware of this early on and think about at the point of buying rather than rationalizing a purchase..
    • A Smug Dill
      Alas, one cannot know “good” without some idea of “bad” against which to contrast; and, as one of my former bosses (back when I was in my twenties) used to say, “on the scale of good to bad…”, it's a spectrum, not a dichotomy. Whereas subjectively acceptable (or tolerable) and unacceptable may well be a dichotomy to someone, and finding whether the threshold or cusp between them lies takes experiencing many degrees of less-than-ideal, especially if the decision is somehow influenced by factors o
    • adamselene
      I got my first real fountain pen on my 60th birthday and many hundreds of pens later I’ve often thought of what I should’ve known in the beginning. I have many pens, the majority of which have some objectionable feature. If they are too delicate, or can’t be posted, or they are too precious to face losing , still they are users, but only in very limited environments..  I have a big disliking for pens that have the cap jump into the air and fly off. I object to Pens that dry out, or leave blobs o
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...