Jump to content

Parker Im Date Code


Megaten

Recommended Posts

Hello all. I have a Parker IM that has the date code II U in that order. That seems to correlate with 1991 or 2001 or 2011. However, shouldnt the letter U come first? I was looking on parker penography and II U seems to only match with 1991, which is wrong. If you guys have an IM and have codes similar to this perhaps I could see what you got? Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 6
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • gammada

    3

  • Megaten

    3

  • ardene

    1

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Mine has a IIIE code and it's one of the current models. According to Parker Penography, it is a 2008 pen, except this model was restyled sometime in 2016 or 2017, so that can't be. Yours have any country of origin imprint? Mine does not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have an IM of the 2009 redesign with code corresponding to 2005. However as you may guess this is not possible, so the only solution is that it was made in 2015 and the official dating style can be found mainly on Sonnets and Duofolds... (exceptions might exist there as well).

Edited by ardene
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mine has a IIIE code and it's one of the current models. According to Parker Penography, it is a 2008 pen, except this model was restyled sometime in 2016 or 2017, so that can't be. Yours have any country of origin imprint? Mine does not.

Hi no it doesn't say where its made so China probably. Mine has to be from 2011 considering that in 2001 and 1991 the IM did not exist yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi no it doesn't say where its made so China probably. Mine has to be from 2011 considering that in 2001 and 1991 the IM did not exist yet.

If we go by this text from richardspens.com, you seem to be right:

 

Thus, a pen marked UL was manufactured in the third quarter of 1981, and one marked IIIL was manufactured in the first quarter of 1994 or, if the code format had remained unchanged, 2004. To prevent any ambiguity between the 1990s and the 2000s, Parker in 2000 reversed the order of the year and quarter codes, also inserting a dot between them. Thus, pens made in the first quarter of 2000 were labeled Q.III instead of IIIQ as had been used a decade earlier. It appears that Parker made no format changes in 2010; pens made in 2010 bear date codes identical to those on pens made in 2000. As with the original date code system, you will need to observe the features of the pen to determine when it was made. (E.g., the new Premier was introduced in 2009 and so did not become a dating conundrum until 2019.)

 

Then mine is a 2018 pen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we go by this text from richardspens.com, you seem to be right:

 

Thus, a pen marked UL was manufactured in the third quarter of 1981, and one marked IIIL was manufactured in the first quarter of 1994 or, if the code format had remained unchanged, 2004. To prevent any ambiguity between the 1990s and the 2000s, Parker in 2000 reversed the order of the year and quarter codes, also inserting a dot between them. Thus, pens made in the first quarter of 2000 were labeled Q.III instead of IIIQ as had been used a decade earlier. It appears that Parker made no format changes in 2010; pens made in 2010 bear date codes identical to those on pens made in 2000. As with the original date code system, you will need to observe the features of the pen to determine when it was made. (E.g., the new Premier was introduced in 2009 and so did not become a dating conundrum until 2019.)

 

Then mine is a 2018 pen.

Yeah yours has to be 2018 since yours is the 2016 redesign. I just find it weird that on my date code the roman numerals are first instead of letters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43844
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      33583
    3. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    4. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      26772
    5. jar
      jar
      26105
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • Shanghai Knife Dude
      I have the Sailor Naginata and some fancy blade nibs coming after 2022 by a number of new workshop from China.  With all my respect, IMHO, they are all (bleep) in doing chinese characters.  Go use a bush, or at least a bush pen. 
    • A Smug Dill
      It is the reason why I'm so keen on the idea of a personal library — of pens, nibs, inks, paper products, etc. — and spent so much money, as well as time and effort, to “build” it for myself (because I can't simply remember everything, especially as I'm getting older fast) and my wife, so that we can “know”; and, instead of just disposing of what displeased us, or even just not good enough to be “given the time of day” against competition from >500 other pens and >500 other inks for our at
    • adamselene
      Agreed.  And I think it’s good to be aware of this early on and think about at the point of buying rather than rationalizing a purchase..
    • A Smug Dill
      Alas, one cannot know “good” without some idea of “bad” against which to contrast; and, as one of my former bosses (back when I was in my twenties) used to say, “on the scale of good to bad…”, it's a spectrum, not a dichotomy. Whereas subjectively acceptable (or tolerable) and unacceptable may well be a dichotomy to someone, and finding whether the threshold or cusp between them lies takes experiencing many degrees of less-than-ideal, especially if the decision is somehow influenced by factors o
    • adamselene
      I got my first real fountain pen on my 60th birthday and many hundreds of pens later I’ve often thought of what I should’ve known in the beginning. I have many pens, the majority of which have some objectionable feature. If they are too delicate, or can’t be posted, or they are too precious to face losing , still they are users, but only in very limited environments..  I have a big disliking for pens that have the cap jump into the air and fly off. I object to Pens that dry out, or leave blobs o
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...