Jump to content

Another Interesting Pen - Mabie Todd For Wanamaker


Recommended Posts

I just got this. This is my first solid gold pen, and it's a little interesting. It has a split lever, which was only made for a year. I was originally told that it was in 1919, but the engraving for Christmas 1918 indicates that the pen was made a little earlier. It's a gorgeous pen.

 

fpn_1586807272__mabietodd_14k_wanamaker_

 

fpn_1586807308__mabietodd_14k_wanamaker_

 

fpn_1586807342__mabietodd_14k_wanamaker_

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 8
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Greenie

    2

  • gweimer1

    1

  • Cob

    1

  • eachan

    1

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Very interesting - 1918! I am surprised.

 

I had a silver one; sadly lost...

 

I'm afraid that they do not hold much ink!

 

Cob

fpn_1428963683__6s.jpg “The pen of the British Empire” fpn_1423349537__swan_sign_is.jpg


Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was a rather silly filling system. Inefficient.

But a beautiful pen with a rare feature and a fantastic engraving.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Congratulations on obtaining such a wonderful pen. I'm a little surprised at the early date but it must be right!

Regards,

Eachan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, great looking pen.

Does it need restored?

What is its nib like?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My great grandfather worked in procurement at John Wanamaker back in the early part of the 20th century. I wonder of he was involved in procurement of pens like that? Thank you for sharing it with us!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A beautiful pen gweimer1.

The date is correct, these were produced in 1918/19 for a short time.

I have a 1918 dated split-lever one with an inscription for 'Matron 1918' (it is the same set photographed on page 114 of Mabie in America by David Moak).

Rather poignant for these times.

Annotation 2020-04-17 121243.pngMabie Todd Pen-Split Lever-Matron 1918 (2) Reduced File Size.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suppose we should be more accurate when we discuss the split lever and say 1918/19.

 

The construction is clearly the same as the Riesenberg patent 1249501 Dec 11, 1917.

But the Moak book also says that they cited Tanimura 1267288 May 21, 1918.

 

Does anyone have any insight into this? My hard rubber split levers say patent applied for. And my overlays do not cite a patent for this at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43844
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      33563
    3. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    4. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      26746
    5. jar
      jar
      26101
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • Shanghai Knife Dude
      I have the Sailor Naginata and some fancy blade nibs coming after 2022 by a number of new workshop from China.  With all my respect, IMHO, they are all (bleep) in doing chinese characters.  Go use a bush, or at least a bush pen. 
    • A Smug Dill
      It is the reason why I'm so keen on the idea of a personal library — of pens, nibs, inks, paper products, etc. — and spent so much money, as well as time and effort, to “build” it for myself (because I can't simply remember everything, especially as I'm getting older fast) and my wife, so that we can “know”; and, instead of just disposing of what displeased us, or even just not good enough to be “given the time of day” against competition from >500 other pens and >500 other inks for our at
    • adamselene
      Agreed.  And I think it’s good to be aware of this early on and think about at the point of buying rather than rationalizing a purchase..
    • A Smug Dill
      Alas, one cannot know “good” without some idea of “bad” against which to contrast; and, as one of my former bosses (back when I was in my twenties) used to say, “on the scale of good to bad…”, it's a spectrum, not a dichotomy. Whereas subjectively acceptable (or tolerable) and unacceptable may well be a dichotomy to someone, and finding whether the threshold or cusp between them lies takes experiencing many degrees of less-than-ideal, especially if the decision is somehow influenced by factors o
    • adamselene
      I got my first real fountain pen on my 60th birthday and many hundreds of pens later I’ve often thought of what I should’ve known in the beginning. I have many pens, the majority of which have some objectionable feature. If they are too delicate, or can’t be posted, or they are too precious to face losing , still they are users, but only in very limited environments..  I have a big disliking for pens that have the cap jump into the air and fly off. I object to Pens that dry out, or leave blobs o
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...