Jump to content

Another "please Identify This Sheaffer Model" Thread


Paul-in-SF

Recommended Posts

Rather plain, black, white dot, just over 5" with cap. It has a plunger filler with a sort of internal barrel which, in my very limited experience, I haven't seen before. Once I know the model I can search out answers for my various servicing questions. Like: how do the bits at the end of the plunger rod fit together and into the end cap (they weren't put together right when I got it); is there supposed to be an o-ring inside that inner barrel (I can't see one nor an evidence of one, but it's hard to see in there). Maybe one or two more. Oh, yes, does the section come off of the internal barrel (I can't see a join).

 

All the inscriptions are quite generic. Barrel just says the usual "W.A. Sheaffer Pen Co." etc. and the nib just says "Scheaffer's Reg. U.S. Pat. Off. Made in USA 14 k." Nothing positive to indicate the model.

post-147249-0-08494400-1562281479_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Paul-in-SF

    3

  • PaulS

    2

  • bsenn

    1

  • doggle2

    1

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

with my limited knolwedge of Sheaffer I could be very wrong, but is there a chance this is an early Balance Vac-Fill with open nib?

I'd suggest you're presently missing a couple of barrel seals - and what have you done with the feed? :) IIRC the section doesn't separate from the internal ink reservoir, which should clean up as an ink visulator.

 

If I'm correct, this isn't the easiest pens to work on, but you've a head start insofar as this one is in bits to start with. Certainly restoration of the Vac-Fil, as a model, is covered in some detail in the Marshall & Oldfield Repair Manual, so if this is as suggested then said manual is essential reading.

Edited by PaulS
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks. From some reading I thought the internal barrel/ink container was in the later vac fill pens, the earlier pens just used the barrel itself as the ink container (I've seen one of those taken apart).

 

The pen didn't come this way, I took it apart myself. Sorry the feed didn't make it into the photo. I've ordered new barrel seals, I hope they fit and that I understand where and how to put them. Those fiddly bits in the blind cap have me stymied at the moment, apparently I need a split screwdriver to drive the shiny piece fully into the cap while the nut piece is sticking through it. Maybe I can sacrifice an old screwdriver to make one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's definitely not a Balance—it's a post-war Sheaffer, from around 1948. It also has a metal cap band, an obvious indicator if this not being a Balance.

I'm pretty sure it's a Sovereign (

Link to comment
Share on other sites

See the D11 tools here for blind cap removal (and other info on plunger fillers):

 

https://pentooling.com/toolssheaffer.html

 

Seeing the tool might give you a starting point to make your own.

 

Brian

 

Well, holy heck, this is rapidly becoming more trouble than it's worth, unless I want to go into this kind of restoration on a regular and ongoing basis. Thank you for the reference, I ordered some stuff from that page yesterday, but I clearly did not scroll down far enough to get as discouraged as I should be.

 

Working with their numbers, I must have the one that requires a D11, because I have a screwdriver that measures 0.036" and it fits into the slot with a little play. I assumed I would be able to screw in the aluminum dingus with the nut sticking through it, into the blind cap, and then screw the rod into the nut, so that a straight tool would do the job and I wouldn't need one with a bend in it. We'll see.

 

Doggle2, thanks for the identification. Richard Binder's site seems to be saying that the Sovereigns had stainless steel caps rather than plastic, although I only find references to that model on the Triumph TM and Snorkel pages, and this pen is neither of those. I don't find any reference to the Sovereign model in the Peyton Street Pens reference. On the Pen Hero site, they say that the Sovereign would have a #3 14 karat two-toned palladium masked open nib, (Richard's site says it was a #5) which could describe this nib. That nib was also used on the Saratoga, Saratogas had plastic caps, so maybe that's what this is? I didn't notice before today, but there's a white dot on the end of the blind cap as well as above the clip. I don't know if that means anything.

 

However, in any case, I don't think it really matters for the repairs. With everyone's help that's been narrowed down enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We had one and called it a "Transitional Sovereign" because ours had a white-dot-qualifying barrel imprint (875) but lacked the white dot on the clip and lacked a Lifetime nib.

 

https://www.peytonstreetpens.com/sheaffer-875-sovereign-fountain-pen-black-fat-vac-fil-medium-fine-14k-open-nib-superior-restored.html

 

Sheaffer re-used the Sovereign name on a later snorkel model ..... that's the one with the stainless steel cap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43844
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      33584
    3. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    4. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      26772
    5. jar
      jar
      26105
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • Shanghai Knife Dude
      I have the Sailor Naginata and some fancy blade nibs coming after 2022 by a number of new workshop from China.  With all my respect, IMHO, they are all (bleep) in doing chinese characters.  Go use a bush, or at least a bush pen. 
    • A Smug Dill
      It is the reason why I'm so keen on the idea of a personal library — of pens, nibs, inks, paper products, etc. — and spent so much money, as well as time and effort, to “build” it for myself (because I can't simply remember everything, especially as I'm getting older fast) and my wife, so that we can “know”; and, instead of just disposing of what displeased us, or even just not good enough to be “given the time of day” against competition from >500 other pens and >500 other inks for our at
    • adamselene
      Agreed.  And I think it’s good to be aware of this early on and think about at the point of buying rather than rationalizing a purchase..
    • A Smug Dill
      Alas, one cannot know “good” without some idea of “bad” against which to contrast; and, as one of my former bosses (back when I was in my twenties) used to say, “on the scale of good to bad…”, it's a spectrum, not a dichotomy. Whereas subjectively acceptable (or tolerable) and unacceptable may well be a dichotomy to someone, and finding whether the threshold or cusp between them lies takes experiencing many degrees of less-than-ideal, especially if the decision is somehow influenced by factors o
    • adamselene
      I got my first real fountain pen on my 60th birthday and many hundreds of pens later I’ve often thought of what I should’ve known in the beginning. I have many pens, the majority of which have some objectionable feature. If they are too delicate, or can’t be posted, or they are too precious to face losing , still they are users, but only in very limited environments..  I have a big disliking for pens that have the cap jump into the air and fly off. I object to Pens that dry out, or leave blobs o
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...