Jump to content

Parker 51 Desk Pen C/c Filler?


surprise123

Recommended Posts

I just bought a desk pen off ebay. I'm thoroughly confused and scared.

 

It has a hooded nib, a thin clutch ring, but it has a CONVERTER. I have neither seen nor heard of a Parker 51 cartridge converter pen.

 

Maybe just a Parker 61 desk pen, but then I could rip out the nib for other pens, since it was $14.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 6
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • joss

    2

  • christof

    2

  • pajaro

    1

  • surprise123

    1

Top Posters In This Topic

There was a Parker 51 C/C pen. According to a dearly departed expert, Old Griz, who had had one, the ink flow was not so good and the pen was not as good as a normal sac filler 51. The converter had a sac. I had one of these pens as part of a hoard, but I gave it away before I tried it. I never got feedback on how it wrote. I think it just became a collectible.

"Don't hurry, don't worry. It's better to be late at the Golden Gate than to arrive in Hell on time."
--Sign in a bar and grill, Ormond Beach, Florida, 1960.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

does it looks like this?

 

17971322794_6a92037061_k.jpgParker 61(?) Desk Pen by c_m_z, auf Flickr

 

 

then, I guess it's kind of a late P61 but without the arrow at the section. I have also one of these but never was able to identify clearly.

 

C.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You may have found a really rare bird.

 

It is possible you have a P51 C/C desk pen. The hood shape is reminiscent of the P61 without an arrow in the hood, but the P51 c/c can also be called 'like a P61 but without an arrow'. The real clincher would be the internals of the hood. If the shell didn't have a collector, but had an odd simulation of the collector, as shown in the image link below:

https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSf3-3Fr3snQCr6HLjIi5ewMgto8PiVnRQZhV_y2VJYbPYMjug8

If however, the internals have a proper collector, then you may have a different rare bird, an arrowless P61 desk pen, and it'd be the first I've heard of (not that I'm an authority!). The hood does seem to be showing dents correct for a P61 suffering from shell shrinkage. The hood tip shape is very P61 like, much more so than the Argentinian P61's even.

 

The P17 did have variants that had a P61 shape tip on the hood, but I am unaware of any that were c/c, so that is unlikely.

 

I'm not suggesting you take the hood off if it won't come easily, but it might be worth seeing if it does. I think you have an unusual pen either way.

 

If however, the internals have a proper collector, then I think

 

Regards,

 

Richard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Christof, the pen that you have is an early 1970s Parker "1C8" desk pen. These pens are 1970 to ca 1974.

 

From 1970 on, Parker slightly changed the design of the Parker 51 desk pen (which was still present in 1969 Parker dealer pamphlets) and stopped classifying the new desk pens into the previous 51 or 45 series.

 

Below is a copy from a 1970 dek pen pamphlet showing your pen at the far left:

 

fpn_1552038517__pdp-1970.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43844
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      33583
    3. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    4. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      26772
    5. jar
      jar
      26105
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • Shanghai Knife Dude
      I have the Sailor Naginata and some fancy blade nibs coming after 2022 by a number of new workshop from China.  With all my respect, IMHO, they are all (bleep) in doing chinese characters.  Go use a bush, or at least a bush pen. 
    • A Smug Dill
      It is the reason why I'm so keen on the idea of a personal library — of pens, nibs, inks, paper products, etc. — and spent so much money, as well as time and effort, to “build” it for myself (because I can't simply remember everything, especially as I'm getting older fast) and my wife, so that we can “know”; and, instead of just disposing of what displeased us, or even just not good enough to be “given the time of day” against competition from >500 other pens and >500 other inks for our at
    • adamselene
      Agreed.  And I think it’s good to be aware of this early on and think about at the point of buying rather than rationalizing a purchase..
    • A Smug Dill
      Alas, one cannot know “good” without some idea of “bad” against which to contrast; and, as one of my former bosses (back when I was in my twenties) used to say, “on the scale of good to bad…”, it's a spectrum, not a dichotomy. Whereas subjectively acceptable (or tolerable) and unacceptable may well be a dichotomy to someone, and finding whether the threshold or cusp between them lies takes experiencing many degrees of less-than-ideal, especially if the decision is somehow influenced by factors o
    • adamselene
      I got my first real fountain pen on my 60th birthday and many hundreds of pens later I’ve often thought of what I should’ve known in the beginning. I have many pens, the majority of which have some objectionable feature. If they are too delicate, or can’t be posted, or they are too precious to face losing , still they are users, but only in very limited environments..  I have a big disliking for pens that have the cap jump into the air and fly off. I object to Pens that dry out, or leave blobs o
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...