Jump to content

Waterman Man 100 C/f Cartridge/converter 1983


aurore

Recommended Posts

Did any Man 100 ever used C/F cartridges/converters instead of modern ones?

I have seen a 1983 piece in the original box that included C/F converter and a pack of C/F cartridges. A bit confusing...

Seeking a Parker Duofold Centennial cap top medallion/cover/decal.
My Mosaic Black Centennial MK2 lost it (used to have silver color decal).

Preferably MK2. MK3 or MK1 is also OK as long as it fits.  
Preferably EU.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 10
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Francois_uk

    3

  • RMN

    2

  • aurore

    2

  • Mr.Rene

    1

I think it is a mistake.Waterman Man 100 takes new converter and cartridges (European size) in actual production. Regards

Edited by Mr.Rene
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it is a mistake.Waterman Man 100 takes new converter and cartridges (European size) in actual production. Regards

Even the earliest version made in 1983?

Seeking a Parker Duofold Centennial cap top medallion/cover/decal.
My Mosaic Black Centennial MK2 lost it (used to have silver color decal).

Preferably MK2. MK3 or MK1 is also OK as long as it fits.  
Preferably EU.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

I can only reply based on my own experience, but I believe this is the case.

 

My very first Man 100 was the 1983 version and was offered to me as a birthday gift not long after it was released in the shops. The first box was as per pictures enclosed and contained a CF type converter.

 

http://www.chezrossi.net/pen/Man_100_1983_Box1_A.jpg

 

The box has a single Waterman logo and has a velvet-like cover.

 

Inside, you have the special 1883-1983 lettering on the ribbon as well as the leather case.

 

http://www.chezrossi.net/pen/Man_100_1983_Box1_B.jpg

 

Underneath, this is what it contained, unchanged from when I got it.

 

http://www.chezrossi.net/pen/Man_100_1983_Box1_C.jpg

 

 

Later on, I purchased a second Man 100 1983. This time, the box looks a bit different. Still the velvet-like cover, but with more logo imprinted. Also, the converter is no longer a CF.

 

http://www.chezrossi.net/pen/Man_100_1983_Box2_A.jpg

 

http://www.chezrossi.net/pen/Man_100_1983_Box3_A.jpg

 

Finally, a second gen Man 100. This time, the box is a leatherette type cover and the same converter.

 

http://www.chezrossi.net/pen/Man_100_1983_Box4.jpg

 

I can say for definite that my earlier box never got the imprints you see on box 2 (i.e. not like they were there but faded over time) and the box did come with the converter you see.

 

Could it be that the shop kept the converter like that of box 2 and put a CF instead? Could be. I cannot even tell if the CF converter can be use with the Man 100 as I've always used the Waterman cartridges with it.

- The only imaginative fiction being written today is income tax returns -

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure that squeeze converter is a CF. AFAIK the Man 100 was not a CF type pen. (correct me if I'm wrong)

Interesting is that all boxes have the 23 type cartridges. I have yet to find out the designation of the various numbers. There is also an 88 type cartridge.

 

Perhaps 23 was the current type and they dropped the number later on when they stopped making different sizes?

 

 

 

D.ick

~

KEEP SAFE, WEAR A MASK, KEEP A DISTANCE.

Freedom exists by virtue of self limitation.

~

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a late 1980's early 90's catalogue which shows that converter (post #4, third picture) and it's termed an 89508 CF Metal convertor (as typed).

 

The catalogue also shows the later 56010 Metal convertor (as typed) with screw and 56002 Plastic + Metal convertor (as typed)

 

So perhaps they all fit the modern pens.

 

Yet, my 1988 dealers catalogue shows bottled ink but no converters.

 

post-42786-0-76653000-1549388398_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have just looked at a CF cartridge and a type 23 cartridge. The CF is just shorter. It seems that both have the same diameter. So the CF metal converter could well be used with a Man 100.

- The only imaginative fiction being written today is income tax returns -

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's make it a little bit more complicated ... B) ... : there are several types of Waterman "23" cartridges !

 

What I think is that Waterman used to call "23" its 'standard" size cartridges. As anyone knows, the "standard" has evoluated over the years, and the previous "23" cartridges wouldn't fit in a Man 100 body : they had a kind of excrescence on their body :

 

http://i1092.photobucket.com/albums/i404/Xof72000/SAM_7673_zpsov1dyqkn.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is a picture of the different types of no 23 cartridges. The picture above shows the old type. Not a pack design I can recall being sold in France, but I may be wrong. The photo below shows the old 88 type sold in the 60's. Then the new 23 standard introduced in the 70's, the one from the 80's that is not washable, and the one from the 80's that is washable. The difference is in the shoulder that goes into the nib section, much longer in the old type. You need this old type with a Line 60 for example. The other 3 fit a Man 100 and later.

 

http://www.chezrossi.net/pen/Waterman_cartridges.jpg

Edited by Francois_uk

- The only imaginative fiction being written today is income tax returns -

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's make it a little bit more complicated ... B) ... : there are several types of Waterman "23" cartridges !

 

What I think is that Waterman used to call "23" its 'standard" size cartridges. As anyone knows, the "standard" has evoluated over the years, and the previous "23" cartridges wouldn't fit in a Man 100 body : they had a kind of excrescence on their body :

 

http://i1092.photobucket.com/albums/i404/Xof72000/SAM_7673_zpsov1dyqkn.jpg

 

 

Here is a picture of the different types of no 23 cartridges. The picture above shows the old type. Not a pack design I can recall being sold in France, but I may be wrong. The photo below shows the old 88 type sold in the 60's. Then the new 23 standard introduced in the 70's, the one from the 80's that is not washable, and the one from the 80's that is washable. The difference is in the shoulder that goes into the nib section, much longer in the old type. You need this old type with a Line 60 for example. The other 3 fit a Man 100 and later.

 

http://www.chezrossi.net/pen/Waterman_cartridges.jpg

 

Yes, but note that they are 88-23 cartridges, a different size/type from the regular 23.

 

 

D.ick

~

KEEP SAFE, WEAR A MASK, KEEP A DISTANCE.

Freedom exists by virtue of self limitation.

~

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43844
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      33582
    3. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    4. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      26771
    5. jar
      jar
      26105
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • Shanghai Knife Dude
      I have the Sailor Naginata and some fancy blade nibs coming after 2022 by a number of new workshop from China.  With all my respect, IMHO, they are all (bleep) in doing chinese characters.  Go use a bush, or at least a bush pen. 
    • A Smug Dill
      It is the reason why I'm so keen on the idea of a personal library — of pens, nibs, inks, paper products, etc. — and spent so much money, as well as time and effort, to “build” it for myself (because I can't simply remember everything, especially as I'm getting older fast) and my wife, so that we can “know”; and, instead of just disposing of what displeased us, or even just not good enough to be “given the time of day” against competition from >500 other pens and >500 other inks for our at
    • adamselene
      Agreed.  And I think it’s good to be aware of this early on and think about at the point of buying rather than rationalizing a purchase..
    • A Smug Dill
      Alas, one cannot know “good” without some idea of “bad” against which to contrast; and, as one of my former bosses (back when I was in my twenties) used to say, “on the scale of good to bad…”, it's a spectrum, not a dichotomy. Whereas subjectively acceptable (or tolerable) and unacceptable may well be a dichotomy to someone, and finding whether the threshold or cusp between them lies takes experiencing many degrees of less-than-ideal, especially if the decision is somehow influenced by factors o
    • adamselene
      I got my first real fountain pen on my 60th birthday and many hundreds of pens later I’ve often thought of what I should’ve known in the beginning. I have many pens, the majority of which have some objectionable feature. If they are too delicate, or can’t be posted, or they are too precious to face losing , still they are users, but only in very limited environments..  I have a big disliking for pens that have the cap jump into the air and fly off. I object to Pens that dry out, or leave blobs o
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...