Jump to content

The Ideal 149?


Inkling13

Recommended Posts

http://i573.photobucket.com/albums/ss171/DKbRS/Pens/MB149Dating.jpgI was wondering when the most ideal 149's were manufactured? It seems from what I've gathered that new nibs are quite soulless and nail-like. But the brass threads on the filler seem more robust. Also, it seems that ebonite is desired over plastic?

Just wondering, as I'm contemplating dipping my toes into the MB pond with a used 149.

Edited by Inkling13
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 12
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • meiers

    3

  • niksch

    2

  • Inkling13

    2

  • eidola

    2

Top Posters In This Topic

I don't know if the parts are interchangeable between generations, but if they are you could build your perfect 149 albeit it would be fairly expensive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know if the parts are interchangeable between generations, but if they are you could build your perfect 149 albeit it would be fairly expensive.

 

 

I think the nibs are fairly interchangeable and I see older 149 nibs for sale somewhat regularly. I wouldn't say a Frankepen 149 would be cheap but it might not be too expensive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In my humble opinion and experience limited to 149s manufacturered in the last 20 years, all working 149s are ideal.

 

What matters, I think, is the performance of the nib. Each one of my 149s is a stellar writer and I have developed a real liking to them. I hope to experience 149s made in the 1950s and 60s some time in the not too distant future.

Edited by meiers
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have 149s from all eras, nibs, and feeds. My personal opinion is the early to mid 1960s pens are the best fit for me. Here are the reasons:

 

1. Softer, springer nibs, especially in the EF size.

2. More weight balance towards nib, as the press-fit piston housings weigh much less than the brass, so less weight away from the nib.

3. Large ink capacity vs modern 149. Only slightly.

4. Ebonite feed

5. Better plating that on the 1980s 149s I have had (may well be a sample size related observation)

6. The possibility to find 3B nib width (pretty rare, but not impossible) or an EF with a bit of an architect grind effect.

7. Prefer the style of (hand?) engraving on the cap bands.

8. Prefer the clip style

9. Prefer the screw off derby as it makes it easier to fiddle with the clip.

10. One piece body lessens chances for leaking around threads.

 

Dislike the fact the piston is much harder to remove without cracking the barrel so servicing is more difficult.

Edited by zaddick

If you want less blah, blah, blah and more pictures, follow me on Instagram!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you. I appreciate your sharing this first-hand experience with earlier models.

 

I love the look of the silver rings on the early fifties models.

However, worries about celluloid shrinking and the fragility of the material might keep me up at night. Are such worries justified?

Edited by meiers
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you. I appreciate your sharing this first-hand experience with earlier models.

 

I love the look of the silver rings on the early fifties models.

However, worries about celluloid shrinking and the fragility of the material might keep me up at night. Are such worries justified?

 

Precisely your reasons. The nibs are still good, but I don't have to worry about shrinkage. I've had issues with *every* celluloid MB of this vintage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you. I appreciate your sharing this first-hand experience with earlier models.

 

I love the look of the silver rings on the early fifties models.

However, worries about celluloid shrinking and the fragility of the material might keep me up at night. Are such worries justified?

 

Matt,

 

I've got or have had a few celluloid 149s, and material shrinking or fragileness weren't really issues for me.

Hard times don't last, but hard people do.

 

Thank a Veteran.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have 149s from all eras, nibs, and feeds. My personal opinion is the early to mid 1960s pens are the best fit for me. Here are the reasons:

 

1. Softer, springer nibs, especially in the EF size.

2. More weight balance towards nib, as the press-fit piston housings weigh much less than the brass, so less weight away from the nib.

3. Large ink capacity vs modern 149. Only slightly.

4. Ebonite feed

5. Better plating that on the 1980s 149s I have had (may well be a sample size related observation)

6. The possibility to find 3B nib width (pretty rare, but not impossible) or an EF with a bit of an architect grind effect.

7. Prefer the style of (hand?) engraving on the cap bands.

8. Prefer the clip style

9. Prefer the screw off derby as it makes it easier to fiddle with the clip.

10. One piece body lessens chances for leaking around threads.

 

Dislike the fact the piston is much harder to remove without cracking the barrel so servicing is more difficult.

 

I agree, mostly, and especially with #6. WRT #10, Maybe it's my preference for use of early '60s 149, but I've experienced more leaks at the threads on one-piece body 149s than on the more modern versions, and the sections on the '60s bodies are harder to repair.

Hard times don't last, but hard people do.

 

Thank a Veteran.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Announcements


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43844
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      33583
    3. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    4. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      26772
    5. jar
      jar
      26105
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • Shanghai Knife Dude
      I have the Sailor Naginata and some fancy blade nibs coming after 2022 by a number of new workshop from China.  With all my respect, IMHO, they are all (bleep) in doing chinese characters.  Go use a bush, or at least a bush pen. 
    • A Smug Dill
      It is the reason why I'm so keen on the idea of a personal library — of pens, nibs, inks, paper products, etc. — and spent so much money, as well as time and effort, to “build” it for myself (because I can't simply remember everything, especially as I'm getting older fast) and my wife, so that we can “know”; and, instead of just disposing of what displeased us, or even just not good enough to be “given the time of day” against competition from >500 other pens and >500 other inks for our at
    • adamselene
      Agreed.  And I think it’s good to be aware of this early on and think about at the point of buying rather than rationalizing a purchase..
    • A Smug Dill
      Alas, one cannot know “good” without some idea of “bad” against which to contrast; and, as one of my former bosses (back when I was in my twenties) used to say, “on the scale of good to bad…”, it's a spectrum, not a dichotomy. Whereas subjectively acceptable (or tolerable) and unacceptable may well be a dichotomy to someone, and finding whether the threshold or cusp between them lies takes experiencing many degrees of less-than-ideal, especially if the decision is somehow influenced by factors o
    • adamselene
      I got my first real fountain pen on my 60th birthday and many hundreds of pens later I’ve often thought of what I should’ve known in the beginning. I have many pens, the majority of which have some objectionable feature. If they are too delicate, or can’t be posted, or they are too precious to face losing , still they are users, but only in very limited environments..  I have a big disliking for pens that have the cap jump into the air and fly off. I object to Pens that dry out, or leave blobs o
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...