Jump to content

Chinese Nibs


mke

Recommended Posts

Are there really Chinese nibs with line sizes different from 0.38 and 0.5?

 

I think, all nibs that I have tested were either the obvious 0.38 mm (hooded nibs or fine, sometimes called EF) or 0.5 mm. Certainly, there is a quite large variation especially in the 0.5 nibs. How about finer or broad? Are there any?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Tefolim

    2

  • Seele

    1

  • Mech-for-i

    1

  • mke

    1

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Some brands produce italic nibs, same idea as the Sheaffer italic calligraphy pens. Golden Star (and one or two others) produced specialist nibs for writing in languages in the Arabic alphabet, where the nib is a long vertical slit giving fine vertical lines but very broad horizontal lines.

No, I am not going to list my pens here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Usually, 0.5 was described as f, 0.38 means ef. But it is not accuracy.

 

What's more, in the standard using between 1996-2005, 0.38 is at the range of f, 0.5 at m.

 

And different brand and different series' line sizes are different.

 

财务专用/财会专用≈F or EF.

 

For example, Hero 359's ef and f are similar, boarder than Hero 266 ef.

 

SIPF(Guiguan)'s Guiguan 875 series ef特细(≤0.25mm) is more narrow than Hero 266 ef. And Guiguan 82(1990s-2004?) is described as 0.4mm, which means f is similar to Hero 266 ef特细. Golden Dragon(GD)'s Whitefeather 639 财会专用(ef

or f) is more narrow than another GD's another Model 财会专用(ef or f) and Hero 266 ef.

 

By the way, as SIPF's document said, Hero 100 ef特细 in is about 0.17mm.

 

And now, there is not official ef standard in China.

Edited by Tefolim
Link to comment
Share on other sites

of course there are different width nibs , but these days you are probably seeing the F and EF mostly. They are typically referred to as 0.38 to 0.5 but its kind of misleading. As I've had so call 0.5 nib that write finer than a 0.38. In general though Its fair to say the EF is more like a Japanese fine and a 0.5 is more like a Japanese FM/M , that stated Chinese fountain pen nib always refer to the line width as only a loose reference and in fact in some more detailed documentation the nibs would be referred to write a 0.4-0.6mm for the EF and 0.5-0.7mm for the F.

 

Some specific vintage nibs can be had at M, B, or even wider. Say Fuliwan had M nib option on all their models. And there are some specialist grind for specific models.And of course for the need almost all the major brand had at least a couple of models that can be had with calligraphy nib and, well, not all of them are the same. There is a whole school of variation among the Fude / Calligraphy nibs

Edited by Mech-for-i
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is a 1990s Guiguan 220. Iridium Point Germany mark. Width is B.

The standard in 1996-2005, I do not remember well. It seems that ef≤0.28,f≤0.4,m≤0.6,b>0.6.

Art Pen can reach BB.

post-133921-0-28513500-1508070931_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43844
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      33563
    3. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    4. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      26746
    5. jar
      jar
      26101
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • Shanghai Knife Dude
      I have the Sailor Naginata and some fancy blade nibs coming after 2022 by a number of new workshop from China.  With all my respect, IMHO, they are all (bleep) in doing chinese characters.  Go use a bush, or at least a bush pen. 
    • A Smug Dill
      It is the reason why I'm so keen on the idea of a personal library — of pens, nibs, inks, paper products, etc. — and spent so much money, as well as time and effort, to “build” it for myself (because I can't simply remember everything, especially as I'm getting older fast) and my wife, so that we can “know”; and, instead of just disposing of what displeased us, or even just not good enough to be “given the time of day” against competition from >500 other pens and >500 other inks for our at
    • adamselene
      Agreed.  And I think it’s good to be aware of this early on and think about at the point of buying rather than rationalizing a purchase..
    • A Smug Dill
      Alas, one cannot know “good” without some idea of “bad” against which to contrast; and, as one of my former bosses (back when I was in my twenties) used to say, “on the scale of good to bad…”, it's a spectrum, not a dichotomy. Whereas subjectively acceptable (or tolerable) and unacceptable may well be a dichotomy to someone, and finding whether the threshold or cusp between them lies takes experiencing many degrees of less-than-ideal, especially if the decision is somehow influenced by factors o
    • adamselene
      I got my first real fountain pen on my 60th birthday and many hundreds of pens later I’ve often thought of what I should’ve known in the beginning. I have many pens, the majority of which have some objectionable feature. If they are too delicate, or can’t be posted, or they are too precious to face losing , still they are users, but only in very limited environments..  I have a big disliking for pens that have the cap jump into the air and fly off. I object to Pens that dry out, or leave blobs o
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...