Jump to content

Soennecken Nibs And Dates


Don Jr

Recommended Posts

I'm trying to establish a timeline for the dates that Soennecken used these Gold and Steel nibs in their pens.

post-8336-0-06590300-1507321693_thumb.jpg

 

The first one on the left came from a 507 (circa 1938), but I'm curious to find out which year Soennecken first allowed this type of steel nib (crown w/ 3 jewels and "S", all beneath the big "V") - were they an option for their pens as early as 1930? Certainly they were the standard 1938-1945, but when did this particular style end, and when did the appearance of their steel nibs change over to #3 and #4 from left (crown w/ 3 jewels and "S" beneath "Soennecken", and no big "V")? Was it 1947 or later? Does anyone know when that newer style steel nib was phased out?

 

Regarding the 2 gold nibs pictured: I believe #2 from left was used 1930-1937, and fairly sure after post-war production picked up again around 1947 until the late 1950's. Any thoughts?

 

The first time I've seen the newer style gold nib (#5 / far right - big "S" superimposed over an "O") is around 1960... but I'm wondering how long this style gold nib was used (?).

 

- Don Jr.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Don Jr

    2

  • Bo Bo Olson

    1

  • Christopher Godfrey

    1

  • praxim

    1

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Good luck with this enquiry, Don: I shall find it interesting, myself.

 

I should also like very much to understand the numeration that Soennecken used to designate the various models and families of their pens, which I find totally baffling, at present. I have models of both 504 and 507 designation, so that I know the physical size went up, apparently, with the last number (510 was presumably the largest in that particular series). I have a 1950s 222 (two of them, actually) and would love a 111; but there <was> an earlier 111 from (I think) 1930s -- and it is tiny! Well, very small, so...perhaps my surmisal, above, was wrong (concerning size and model numbers going up together)?

 

What sources have you got to recommend, I wonder?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Christopher,

 

I'm most interested in Soennecken's pens from 1930-1945; I've found searching old posts & threads right here on FPN to be extremely helpful, and of course Lambrou's Fountain Pens of the World.

 

There is an English collector (Pavoni) who frequently posts things here on FPN; he has an older "pinned" post in the Montblanc forum comparing Montblanc and Soennecken pens with some wonderful accompanying photos - if you haven't already seen it, I think you'll find it worth your time.

Additionally, the Italian pen collector's site has a good overview on Soennecken; here's the link to it: http://www.fountainpen.it/Soennecken/en.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

'43...by or after May of '43 it was illegal to make fountain pens in Germany. That was listed in Kaweco info. The directive came out in March of 1943 taking effect in May.

In reference to P. T. Barnum; to advise for free is foolish, ........busybodies are ill liked by both factions.

 

 

The cheapest lessons are from those who learned expensive lessons. Ignorance is best for learning expensive lessons.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

More on this, I have found in documents on on fountainpen.it and in other places about half a dozen designs for nib markings on 14k gold nibs (ignoring Pargo nibs).

 

On the Rheingold and Präsident, there was a 5-jewel crown in which the two outermost were curved inwards toward the others. Below, sideways, an S, and Soennecken, Bonn. Here and here are examples.

 

Later, it seems, they simplified this to a 5-jewel crown with simple circles as the jewels and a less complex crown, below which there was only a sideways S, no words. See here on a 111. I have seen this on a 116 and a 309. So it appears to be a post-war thing (except my 116 has a cap with the sun circle as well as rays on the finial -- frankenpen?).

 

In 1937-38 when the 5xx series was released it came with no crown but the words Soennecken and Bonn on the nib. A poor image of a 510 nib here. I suspect the same design continued after the war while that series was in production.

 

Next up was a 3-jewel crown which I think was for steel nibs only, like the 416 or 9 or Schulfüllers (an S4 had S4 on the nib).

 

I have also a fancy S, the last item in the first post here, on a small piston-filler with no type marking but with hard rubber piston knob, no locking mechanism, low-profile cone as the jewel (not cigar shape) with no finial logo. It has a single very thin gold band on the cap. I can not match it with anything I have seen. Tentatively, I call it a 101.

 

The only Bayard pen I found was marked Bayard, so Soennecken pens presumably stopped their marking at the takeover.

 

 

X

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43844
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      33494
    3. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    4. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      26626
    5. jar
      jar
      26101
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • Shanghai Knife Dude
      I have the Sailor Naginata and some fancy blade nibs coming after 2022 by a number of new workshop from China.  With all my respect, IMHO, they are all (bleep) in doing chinese characters.  Go use a bush, or at least a bush pen. 
    • A Smug Dill
      It is the reason why I'm so keen on the idea of a personal library — of pens, nibs, inks, paper products, etc. — and spent so much money, as well as time and effort, to “build” it for myself (because I can't simply remember everything, especially as I'm getting older fast) and my wife, so that we can “know”; and, instead of just disposing of what displeased us, or even just not good enough to be “given the time of day” against competition from >500 other pens and >500 other inks for our at
    • adamselene
      Agreed.  And I think it’s good to be aware of this early on and think about at the point of buying rather than rationalizing a purchase..
    • A Smug Dill
      Alas, one cannot know “good” without some idea of “bad” against which to contrast; and, as one of my former bosses (back when I was in my twenties) used to say, “on the scale of good to bad…”, it's a spectrum, not a dichotomy. Whereas subjectively acceptable (or tolerable) and unacceptable may well be a dichotomy to someone, and finding whether the threshold or cusp between them lies takes experiencing many degrees of less-than-ideal, especially if the decision is somehow influenced by factors o
    • adamselene
      I got my first real fountain pen on my 60th birthday and many hundreds of pens later I’ve often thought of what I should’ve known in the beginning. I have many pens, the majority of which have some objectionable feature. If they are too delicate, or can’t be posted, or they are too precious to face losing , still they are users, but only in very limited environments..  I have a big disliking for pens that have the cap jump into the air and fly off. I object to Pens that dry out, or leave blobs o
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...