Jump to content

Man Or Le Man?


Laureat75

Recommended Posts

I see the Man 100 and 200 pens described both with and without the definite article. So should they be "Le Man" or just "Man". And anyway, why "Man"? They came after the Gentleman, so was it an attempt to reach a wider market or just a reflection that society was becoming more egalitarian, and the concept of a gentlemen was outmoded?

 

But while we are on the subject of men and gentlemen, I note that the Man pens fetch significantly higher prices than the poor Gentlemen, Were they better pens (it seems unlikely), or are there fewer of them?

 

I must declare an interest. I don't own any Men (they are too expensive), but have 5 Gentlemen, and love them. They are elegant and understated and reassuringly solid. True gentlemen, in fact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 33
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Left FPN

    8

  • Xof72000

    4

  • Chrissy

    3

  • praxim

    3

I have seen these pens referred to as "Leman" 100 or 200, also. The company referred to these as "Le Man" models. In the U.S., as you found, the article is often omitted. I would say that the proper name is that used by the manufacturer - Le Man.

 

i don't own any Gentleman models. I have 3 Le Man 100's and 3 Le Man 200's. I can't compare the quality of the Le Man and Gentleman pens. My impression is they are both first rate.

 

David

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am curious about the naming too. There is a lake near Geneva called Leman. It may be named after that, as I think Caran d'Ache or someone did? It does not fit with Le Mans so maybe it was always Man 100 (& 200). I have some Man 100s but no Gentlemen so can not compare. I can think of a couple of people here who could do that for us. I love my Man 100 pens. They are my favourite Watermans post the 1930s. Required to choose, I would keep them rather than Edsons or any later Waterman.

X

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LE MAN = Lewis Edson WaterMAN

 

So for all intents and purposes it should be LE Man albeit Waterman catalogues state MAN and Le Man.

LE MAN 100 production started in 1983 to commemorate 100 year (1883)

 

as for the LE MAN 200 I have no idea other than just to reduce the size slightly for the FP. The RB & BP are the same size as the 100 so the plot thickens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[updates personal records] :)

(superfluous; found already using Le Man consistently)

Edited by praxim

X

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The right term (here in France) is MAN 100, and all the catalogs I have are mentionning "MAN 100 / 200".

 

LE also mean "the" in french, may be some persons are using "LE MAN 100" to say "The MAN 100".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1988

 

I can only assume the designer and directors head bashing in 1982/3 to think up a name for the new model would have had subtle relationship to Lewis.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Le Man is a name I've always wondered about too. Thanks for the explanation. :)

 

I thought there was an easy way to tell Le Man 100 FP and Le Man 200 FP apart in pictures, but I've forgotten it. Is the nib slightly different? Was the Gentleman slightly less popular because it was a thinner pen? Or am I wandering off topic? :wacko:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So far, no-one has contributed weights and measures for Le Man 200 to the Waterman "Weights and Measures" thread.

 

The latest table there shows the Gentleman to be just a little lighter and smaller compared with a standard Le Man 100. The Patrician and gold/silver models are quite a bit heavier. I read that the 200 is similar to the Gentleman in size and weight. Having neither a Gentleman nor a 200 I can add nothing more about their appearance or writing characteristics.

X

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When you don't have the two together just ask to see the feed. The Le Man 100 feed is finned, the 200 is plain and smooth.

 

I have a 200 so will update the Weights & Measures asap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I borrowed a Le Man 200 Caviar for a while, and it wrote beautifully. Sadly, the owner didn't wish to sell it. However, I've never seen a Le Man 100 'in the flesh' so to speak, although in my best friend's shop, I have seen and handled a green Patrician. It was beautiful but was too expensive for me. :mellow:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1988

 

I can only assume the designer and directors head bashing in 1982/3 to think up a name for the new model would have had subtle relationship to Lewis.

 

attachicon.gifDSCN0682.JPG

 

attachicon.gifDSCN0683.JPG

 

 

Not the same name in every country, then, Force ...

 

22289693_1593340287355760_21436459815775

Edited by Xof72000
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes and not only the Man range. In Japan the Hemisphere is called Metropolitan.

 

One must be very careful with some of the Rhapsody 200 models. There are/were issues with material movement in the barrel. Some pens, discussed on FPN, had sections siezed within the barrel. I had one that was tight but still movable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you, Gentlemen. That's now (fairly) clear! :)

 

But it's interesting that the Man and the Gentleman seem to appeal to different people, given that several people have several of one or t'other, but few people have both.

 

It's a small sample, of course.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have collected quite a few Gentlemen because it was my first "real" fountain pen and I love them. I also have a Man 200 and they are very different pens, with the Man 200 being far more stocky than the Gentleman. Both are very nice writers.

Breathe. Take one step at a time. Don't sweat the small stuff. You're not getting older, you are only moving through time. Be calm and positive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Xof72000, that catalogue entry is intriguing; in the title it's MAN without the definite article, but in the text it says 'du Man', therefore 'le Man'.... Even on the same page, it's inconsistent!

 

Darn good pen though.

Too many pens, too little time!

http://fountainpenlove.blogspot.fr/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Xof72000, that catalogue entry is intriguing; in the title it's MAN without the definite article, but in the text it says 'du Man', therefore 'le Man'.... Even on the same page, it's inconsistent!

 

Darn good pen though.

 

Nothing strange in french !

The name of the model is "Man", so when you talk of it's cap ring, you say "La bague du Man". If the name of the pen was "Le Man" in french, they would have written "La bague du Le Man".

And as I wrote previously, the use of "Le" in front of "Man" just means "The" (it's what we call a definite article : le, la, les, ...).

:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hearty thanks to all that contributed to this thread.

 

I'll be needing it soon. An old timer here, a wonderful fellow has 2 enormous pen cases filled with Gentlemen /100/200s in some of the rarest (in one case a one off n titanium) finishes and mouthwatering nibs, wants to know what he's can get for them. Some in huge wooden boxes. Mottled, Jade, Lapis, wood, Sterling, Night and Day, etc. Most NOS. Some with globe nibs, others not, etc.

 

The problem is that I half the time, can't tell what is what.

 

Odd the second time this year I ran into a fellow in his 80s trying to rehome a collection.

 

I'd like to help this guy out. But this whole line is just maddening.

Edited by ink-syringe

Looking for a cap for a Sheaffer Touchdown Sentinel Deluxe Fat version

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Relax and take a couple of deep breaths! Perhaps you can take photos of the pens, post them here and get the collective's opinion of which pen is which. Remember, these pens were often made in custom orders for businesses (or the King of Jordan, etc.) and other large entities, so you might have some of those, too. Good luck.

Breathe. Take one step at a time. Don't sweat the small stuff. You're not getting older, you are only moving through time. Be calm and positive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43844
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      33563
    3. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    4. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      26746
    5. jar
      jar
      26101
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • Shanghai Knife Dude
      I have the Sailor Naginata and some fancy blade nibs coming after 2022 by a number of new workshop from China.  With all my respect, IMHO, they are all (bleep) in doing chinese characters.  Go use a bush, or at least a bush pen. 
    • A Smug Dill
      It is the reason why I'm so keen on the idea of a personal library — of pens, nibs, inks, paper products, etc. — and spent so much money, as well as time and effort, to “build” it for myself (because I can't simply remember everything, especially as I'm getting older fast) and my wife, so that we can “know”; and, instead of just disposing of what displeased us, or even just not good enough to be “given the time of day” against competition from >500 other pens and >500 other inks for our at
    • adamselene
      Agreed.  And I think it’s good to be aware of this early on and think about at the point of buying rather than rationalizing a purchase..
    • A Smug Dill
      Alas, one cannot know “good” without some idea of “bad” against which to contrast; and, as one of my former bosses (back when I was in my twenties) used to say, “on the scale of good to bad…”, it's a spectrum, not a dichotomy. Whereas subjectively acceptable (or tolerable) and unacceptable may well be a dichotomy to someone, and finding whether the threshold or cusp between them lies takes experiencing many degrees of less-than-ideal, especially if the decision is somehow influenced by factors o
    • adamselene
      I got my first real fountain pen on my 60th birthday and many hundreds of pens later I’ve often thought of what I should’ve known in the beginning. I have many pens, the majority of which have some objectionable feature. If they are too delicate, or can’t be posted, or they are too precious to face losing , still they are users, but only in very limited environments..  I have a big disliking for pens that have the cap jump into the air and fly off. I object to Pens that dry out, or leave blobs o
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...