Jump to content

Anyone Seen This Feed Before?


Greenie

Recommended Posts

This is on an eyedropper pen I recently acquired. I have not seen this type of feed and I am hoping someone might be familiar with it.

 

Over and underfeed. The overfeed seems to be one piece machined along with the rest of the section. The underfeed is scooped out and slides into feed. There is a step on the underfeed that catches the end of the nib shank so the minimal underfeed depth seems to be set. Of course, it could have been broken or shortened sometime in history.

 

fpn_1506300218__feed_04.jpg fpn_1506300201__feed_01.jpg fpn_1506300208__feed_03.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 6
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Greenie

    3

  • eachan

    2

  • CS388

    1

  • EMQG

    1

Top Posters In This Topic

Are you sure that the underfeed is supposed to catch the back of the nib? Because I've never seen nor heard of a nib that doesn't use a proper underfeed. An underfeed that doesn't reach close to the tip of the nib doesn't really do anything at all

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It might be broken off a bit short. And the sides can easily be trimmed back so the feed sits better, a bit further out on the underside of the nib. I am hoping someone is familiar with this and has pictures, or even a lead to point me to perhaps a patent.

 

On the other hand, it could also be correct. Such as old Wirt overfeeds. That Wirt design is just a plain flat piece that wicks ink on to the top of the nib over the slit. No underfeed at all.

 

This design could just be another simple flat overfeed. However, one that does not extend into the barrel. Therefore the underfeed would be less of a feed and instead the part that brings ink into the section, to then be fed via the overfeed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The slightly irregular shape at the end of the underfeed makes me wonder if it was longer, once?

As you say, may have been modified or damaged?

 

Looks interesting, though. I see you're restoring it? Have you had a chance to write with it, yet.

 

The action of gravity and capilliary action working together help me understand an underfeed, rather than an overfeed.

I've had a few pens with both (over and under) but never had a pen with just an over.

 

Thanks for sharing. Good luck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No indication of a maker. The pen has alternating mother of pearl and abalone slabs from end to end except the decorative gold ring on each barrel end holding the slabs. It is a design that leaves no room for a maker's mark, and the nib is unmarked as well.

 

I haven't filled it or written yet. I was hoping to find out more about the underfeed first to see if it needed a bit of restoration as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps the overfeed is the ink delivery system. No harm in filling it and giving it a try. It sounds a most interesting and attractive pen.

Regards,

Eachan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43844
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      33580
    3. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    4. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      26766
    5. jar
      jar
      26105
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • Shanghai Knife Dude
      I have the Sailor Naginata and some fancy blade nibs coming after 2022 by a number of new workshop from China.  With all my respect, IMHO, they are all (bleep) in doing chinese characters.  Go use a bush, or at least a bush pen. 
    • A Smug Dill
      It is the reason why I'm so keen on the idea of a personal library — of pens, nibs, inks, paper products, etc. — and spent so much money, as well as time and effort, to “build” it for myself (because I can't simply remember everything, especially as I'm getting older fast) and my wife, so that we can “know”; and, instead of just disposing of what displeased us, or even just not good enough to be “given the time of day” against competition from >500 other pens and >500 other inks for our at
    • adamselene
      Agreed.  And I think it’s good to be aware of this early on and think about at the point of buying rather than rationalizing a purchase..
    • A Smug Dill
      Alas, one cannot know “good” without some idea of “bad” against which to contrast; and, as one of my former bosses (back when I was in my twenties) used to say, “on the scale of good to bad…”, it's a spectrum, not a dichotomy. Whereas subjectively acceptable (or tolerable) and unacceptable may well be a dichotomy to someone, and finding whether the threshold or cusp between them lies takes experiencing many degrees of less-than-ideal, especially if the decision is somehow influenced by factors o
    • adamselene
      I got my first real fountain pen on my 60th birthday and many hundreds of pens later I’ve often thought of what I should’ve known in the beginning. I have many pens, the majority of which have some objectionable feature. If they are too delicate, or can’t be posted, or they are too precious to face losing , still they are users, but only in very limited environments..  I have a big disliking for pens that have the cap jump into the air and fly off. I object to Pens that dry out, or leave blobs o
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...