Jump to content

Parker Vacumatics Photo Thread


PenHero

Recommended Posts

A RINGED VACUMATIC WITH WING FEED "51" PROTOTYPE

classifieds-110782-0-82712500-1469342786
classifieds-110782-0-32034000-1469342864_thumb.jpg
classifieds-110782-0-91571400-1469342891_thumb.jpg
classifieds-110782-0-52841500-1469342903_thumb.jpg
classifieds-110782-0-04782000-1469342933_thumb.jpg
classifieds-110782-0-16858500-1469342876_thumb.jpg
classifieds-110782-0-32034000-1469342864_thumb.jpg
classifieds-110782-0-93052400-1469342795_thumb.jpg
(OPTIONAL)
A Christmas Tale

Once upon a time I acquired from Ebay a Parker vacumatic golden pearl simply for completing spectrum of this color. There was no other argument that encouraged the purchase decision, although a priori, as an avid reader of Parker imprints that I am, the inscription “22” in the barrel was a small incentive contrasted with the inconvenience of the feed which, discarded that it was a VS model, I thought that it was an odd addition; a frankenspen perhaps, but in any case, an inconvenience that should be replaced by a more adequate one. The section did not even claim my attention because it did not show transparency in Ebay photos and, apparently, it was one normal section of any other vacumatic.

That's how things were when I dipped the pen in the obligatory soak before I take it apart for unscrewing the filling unit in order to install a new diaphragm.

I will reflect the process -type.gif - if in the future we find a similar case or, simply, if someone wants to smile reading it with a good coffee, during this Christmas dessert.

After I put the pen into the water and the following morning it had diluted some of the dry ink from the section and it was faintly transparent. I will be honest; I did not like it. A Parker vacumatic with a visulated section! They put one over on me! You see now, Ramon, I said to myself, adding the occasional thick exclamation; this section is going to be from a Sheaffer'S or another similar one that has been put in a vacumatic forcefully! I did not see humor in any way because, although as I have said I had spare vacs feeds, much to my dismay, it was not so with sections.

Well, go to the point: extract the section will not be easy but I'm not going to stay with that doubt!, I said myself, so I put a drop of oil, I passed the hot air of the dryer, I took the tongs and then a pleasant surprise came to me! the section came out smoothly and what was more striking also threating. From here a process of amazement is triggered because I started to consider the section as an original Parker.

In order to clean it properly and leave it transparent, the feed should be removed. This operation seem to be like a tricky question since the lower part of the feed ends with a larger diameter than the inside diameter of the section - now I know that the feed are two pieces and I could introduce the outer piece by the upper part of the section and the inner part , from the lower part of the section although with a lot of risk of splitting the inside part in two or breaking some "disk" of the cylindrical comb.

Should I extract the feed from the bottom of the section? How to push the section down by hitting the top of the feed, still gently, without damaging it? The lower part of the feed has a longitudinal slit of about 3 or 4 mm in length that made me think that maybe it was there to compress its circumference when it was introduced so, after putting oil on all sides, giving heat and not being clear if I would have to regret in the next few minutes (because I could broke it), I managed to extract it in the usual way, after of course removing, the tube-breathing siphon and gently hitting the feed from the face where it is inserted.

Once the feed was out it was not transparent because the embedded inner dry ink. It still had not occurred to me that it could be two pieces, nevertheless, I leave it in warm water and I prepared to dismantle section.The section, once crystalline and showing its real color, gave me another delightful surprise and confirmation; it was certainly visulated and a really Parker; because if someone, alien to Parker´s, could have made the thread, which is not easy, could not have made it with celluloid Parker, because this is the same as Parker used in the transparent rings of the barrel; so, definitely the section was a Parker one and therefore satisfied with the success that resulted from the decision to open it, I went in search of the feed.

Then, I extracted the feed from the water to clean it properly; brush, hot / warm water and soap. It is already clean and seems to be composed of two elements. It would be necessary to extract one from the other, at least partially, in order to document it and record that the feed consists of two pieces. prudence warned me that the luck I have had until then, may not accompany me in the nexts steps of the process. In the other plate of the balance was to think about the difficulty of being able to affirm, in absence of a graphic proof, that they were two pieces and this quality could not be appreciated on its absence. I told to myself, you know why, that if I had gotten there, I would have to continue. A drop of oil on top, a drop of oil on the bottom , some heat and with rotary motion, I extracted part of the interior piece. Below the water jet to remove rest of oil and to photograph..

After assembling, once reintroduced the delicate prototype feed, and fountain pen completly mounted, an expresion came to my mind; D´oh!

Edited by RamonCampos
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 145
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Brian-McQueen

    36

  • PenHero

    28

  • FarmBoy

    7

  • Buzz J

    6

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

This is a Parker Duofold vacumatic Senior bears Blue Diamond in striped Maroon laidtone celluloid (a combination of carmines, silver, and black strips). Its full-vision barrel shows the ink supply. The 14 k. gold point is tipped with osmiridium. These models in laidtone celluloid, Senior and Ingenue, both BD and Duofold Major, Duofold Debutante non BD were also available in striped blue and striped green and Sacless Duofold and Sacless Duofold Subdeb, non BD too, additionally was avalaible in black. This 5 1/4 inch long pen is dated coded 1941. The pen and pencil price of this Senior model was $10.50 and $4.80, respectively.

 

fpn_1546017637__parker_senior_duofold_va

 

fpn_1546017697__parker_senior_duofold_va

 

fpn_1546017732__parker_senior_duofold_va

Edited by RamonCampos
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A transparent feed and section, amazing! I am going to have to take a closer look at all future vacumatics. Thank you for sharing.

 

Just don't hold your brreath.

"When Men differ in Opinion, both Sides ought equally to have the Advantage of being heard by the Publick; and that when Truth and Error have fair Play, the former is always an overmatch for the latter."

~ Benjamin Franklin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As you know, in August 1937 Parker decided to change the style of the vacumatics and started to commercialize a more streamlined version of the vacumatic in three sizes of their high range; Major, 14 mm. diameter cap band and 131 mm long, was $ 8.75, (set with pencil at $ 12.50) and Senior Maxima, an oversized of 16 mm diameter and 139 mm long, and Maxima, a "full length" of 14,0 mm diameter and 135 mm long, was $ 10.00 (both Maxima set with pencil at $ 15.00). But not only a new streamlined shape but also a new filler mechanism, so the lockdown was replaced with a new style plunger named "Speedline"; it did not lock down so the blind cap was more stylized to fit the new plunger.

 

The new streamlined pen was launched with a luxurious band, wider in the two Maxima, engraved in sunken relief with the Parker´s arrow and the distinctive word "VACUMATIC". They were hardly publicized only for a few months because in December 1937* Parker was already marketed these pen with a simple chevron band ///\\\///\\\ that will last in the ringed vacumatics until second half 1947, coinciding its disappearance with the Blue Diamond that guaranteed them for life.

 

They were presented in colors laminated jet black and shimmering silver pearl, golden pearl, emerald pearl and burgundy pearl.

 

(*) We´ll see VACUMATIC bands later in the time. But that's another story...and maybe not exactly the same VACUMATIC band.

 

xmas.gif¡¡Feliz 2019 a todos!!xmas.gif

 

fpn_1546247078__parker_vacumatic_band_la

 

fpn_1546247153__parker_vacumatic_band_la

Edited by RamonCampos
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your pen reminds me of this prototype I saw online a few weeks ago. That's an incredible find you have.

 

post-146670-0-49333400-1546288884.jpg

Edited by nsalvut
Link to comment
Share on other sites

@nsalvut, in the Vacumatic Book there a some others similar experimental prototypes, like this single jewel attached, combining ringed barrels with clutch ring for "51" caps. The truth is that I would have paid for being employed in the hyperactive Parker Product Development Dept. of those years -smile-.

 

fpn_1546500869__experimental_prototype_r

Edited by RamonCampos
Link to comment
Share on other sites

@nsalvut, in the Vacumatic Book there a some others similar experimental prototypes, like this single jewel attached, combining ringed barrels with clutch ring for "51" caps. The truth is that I would have paid for being employed in the hyperactive Parker Product Development Dept. of those years -smile-.

 

fpn_1546500869__experimental_prototype_r

Yes I agree, it would be amazing to see some of the incredible prototypes they made.

 

I remember the first time I saw a vacumatic online, I gasped at how beautiful it was. Some of these prototypes are just breathtaking in beauty and design in my opinion. My first vintage pen was an Azure blue SJ Vac. I don't like blue, but when that pen arrived in the mail I was shocked at its coloring in person. Ever since then I've been a fan.

 

Some of the cooler prototypes like the one from ebay that I posted sell in the thousands, but what I wouldn't give to own one.

 

Just curious, was your pen featured in a Ripley ad? The photo looks edited but if it was from 1940 it would make a lot of sense why the photo looks a little off.

 

Edit: just kidding. I saw the brass case in your second post. Obviously not an ad, though I guess maybe you should look into marketing school ;)

Edited by nsalvut
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I came across this great Azure Vacumatic Max Set recently. The imprints are gone from the pen -almost as if some purposely removed the imprints or were never on the pen, but there is almost no brassing on the gold trim. The Azure Pencil has been on my want list for quite some time. The flexible American Vac Nib is the best part.

post-147033-0-21830200-1546879628_thumb.jpeg

post-147033-0-41870000-1546879656_thumb.jpeg

post-147033-0-35327100-1546879668_thumb.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi, Folks!

This is a Parker Vacumatic Major in Laminated Golden Pearl (brown) date coded 1946. It's just over 5 inches long capped. The plunger is black. The Vacumatic fills by removing the blind cap at the end of the barrel, revealing the plunger, dipping the nib in ink, and repeatedly pressing the plunger until the barrel fills with ink. Parker claimed the Vacumatic could be filled with one hand. The barrel clarity is excellent. The barrel is stamped GEO S PARKER next to PARKER VACUMATIC next to MADE IN U.S.A. It has gold filled trim. Parker called the ink view barrel a "full television ink supply." It has the 14 karat gold Vacumatic Arrow nib. The Major sold for $8.75 and the matching pencil sold for $4.00. Parker ended US production of the Vacumatic in 1948.
http://penhero.com/Temp/ParkerVacumaticBrown_1280_02.jpg
Thanks!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

Hi, Folks!

 

A throwback photo from 2004!

This is a Parker Vacumatic Major in Laminated Azure Blue Pearl date coded 1945. It's just over 5 inches long capped. The plunger and the cap top jewell are black. The Vacumatic fills by removing the blind cap at the end of the barrel, revealing the plunger, dipping the nib in ink, and repeatedly pressing the plunger until the barrel fills with ink. Parker claimed the Vacumatic could be filled with one hand. The barrel is stamped GEO. S. PARKER next to PARKER VACUMATIC next to MADE IN U.S.A. next to 5 with three dots. It has gold filled trim. Parker called the ink view barrel a "full television ink supply." It has the 14 karat gold Vacumatic Arrow nib stamped PARKER over MADE IN U.S.A. The Major sold for $8.75 and the matching pencil sold for $4.00. Parker ended US production of the Vacumatic in 1948.
http://penhero.com/Temp/ParkerVacumaticBlue_2048_01.jpg
Thanks!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43844
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      33583
    3. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    4. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      26771
    5. jar
      jar
      26105
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • Shanghai Knife Dude
      I have the Sailor Naginata and some fancy blade nibs coming after 2022 by a number of new workshop from China.  With all my respect, IMHO, they are all (bleep) in doing chinese characters.  Go use a bush, or at least a bush pen. 
    • A Smug Dill
      It is the reason why I'm so keen on the idea of a personal library — of pens, nibs, inks, paper products, etc. — and spent so much money, as well as time and effort, to “build” it for myself (because I can't simply remember everything, especially as I'm getting older fast) and my wife, so that we can “know”; and, instead of just disposing of what displeased us, or even just not good enough to be “given the time of day” against competition from >500 other pens and >500 other inks for our at
    • adamselene
      Agreed.  And I think it’s good to be aware of this early on and think about at the point of buying rather than rationalizing a purchase..
    • A Smug Dill
      Alas, one cannot know “good” without some idea of “bad” against which to contrast; and, as one of my former bosses (back when I was in my twenties) used to say, “on the scale of good to bad…”, it's a spectrum, not a dichotomy. Whereas subjectively acceptable (or tolerable) and unacceptable may well be a dichotomy to someone, and finding whether the threshold or cusp between them lies takes experiencing many degrees of less-than-ideal, especially if the decision is somehow influenced by factors o
    • adamselene
      I got my first real fountain pen on my 60th birthday and many hundreds of pens later I’ve often thought of what I should’ve known in the beginning. I have many pens, the majority of which have some objectionable feature. If they are too delicate, or can’t be posted, or they are too precious to face losing , still they are users, but only in very limited environments..  I have a big disliking for pens that have the cap jump into the air and fly off. I object to Pens that dry out, or leave blobs o
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...