Jump to content

Oh, Lots Of Questions! Please Help About Watermans 351 And 502


MercianScribe

Recommended Posts

1) I have a lovely 351 (Ideal) but I can't find anything about them online. It the red-streaked brown one below. It's Canadian, and it has an Ideal No 2A nib. It says 351 on the end... anyone any idea when it's from? I think late 30s, early 40s: would that be right? And does anyone know where the numbering fits in to the Watermans numbering system if at all?

 

2) I have another 351-esque malarkey: the olive green one in the pic. As you can see, it's very similar, and it is also made in Canada. But! No 351 marking, no clip, no box round the lever, no curve to the end of the cap or the blind end. The barrel and cap imprints are identical to the 351. Anyone any idea what that may be? (I put a 'new' nib in so I can't tell you anything about the original). Did they produce identical but lower quality models without numbers in general?

 

3) I have an English 502 coming, and I have the same questions really... What year (late 40s, early 50s AFAIK)? Where do the numbers fit in? What kind of quality? And also, does anyone know the sac size?

 

4) More general question about Watermans bars... There's no lever bar in the olive green 351-y one: can I just by a generic j bar to in or is it easier to fit some kind of straight bar and if so what would that be called?

 

Thanks a lot!post-132145-0-90320500-1501869456_thumb.jpg

Hi, I'm Mat


:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • MercianScribe

    2

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

After a bit more looking around, for those who are interested, here are a couple of possible solutions.

 

1) The red lined one is the spitting image of this Thorobred in colour, but has gold plated furniture and two cap bands:

 

http://dirck.delint.ca/beta/?page_id=3565

 

but would appear to be a commonweath Stalwart which here is labelled 352, and has one band and the new style clip

 

http://dirck.delint.ca/beta/?page_id=3418

 

So, as I suspected and asked about in the original post, it seems numbering and naming were getting quite confused at this stage, unless the Thorobred was the 351, and came with a commonwealth two-band variation like the Stalwart 352.

 

2) The olive coloured one appears to be one of these:

 

http://dirck.delint.ca/beta/?page_id=3418

 

a Stalwart 352, which has lost its clip (I was thinking it would have been the old style clip that the 351 has, so it wouldn't have actually had one originally, as there are no marks of where it would have been - but if it was the new type clip it would've been fixed on the top of the cap, and there is a hole there that may be where it went. Anyway, I thought it odd a pen of the late 40s-early 50s to be clipless.)

 

3) The 502... seems pretty much the same as this Champion 501, except the 501 has one thick band, and the 502 has one thin:

 

http://dirck.delint.ca/beta/?page_id=3367

 

Whereas the 503 has two thin bands...?

 

(Warning: 1 hr long Stephen Brown vid - and I can't believe he didn't mention the sac size in all that!!)

 

 

Could those band variations be the sole criteria for the different numbering?

 

4) Another thing not mentioned in that vid was whether it was a j-bar or a Watermans' own channeled pressure bar thing... so I'm still in the dark... Anyone?

Hi, I'm Mat


:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43844
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      33558
    3. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    4. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      26730
    5. jar
      jar
      26101
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • Shanghai Knife Dude
      I have the Sailor Naginata and some fancy blade nibs coming after 2022 by a number of new workshop from China.  With all my respect, IMHO, they are all (bleep) in doing chinese characters.  Go use a bush, or at least a bush pen. 
    • A Smug Dill
      It is the reason why I'm so keen on the idea of a personal library — of pens, nibs, inks, paper products, etc. — and spent so much money, as well as time and effort, to “build” it for myself (because I can't simply remember everything, especially as I'm getting older fast) and my wife, so that we can “know”; and, instead of just disposing of what displeased us, or even just not good enough to be “given the time of day” against competition from >500 other pens and >500 other inks for our at
    • adamselene
      Agreed.  And I think it’s good to be aware of this early on and think about at the point of buying rather than rationalizing a purchase..
    • A Smug Dill
      Alas, one cannot know “good” without some idea of “bad” against which to contrast; and, as one of my former bosses (back when I was in my twenties) used to say, “on the scale of good to bad…”, it's a spectrum, not a dichotomy. Whereas subjectively acceptable (or tolerable) and unacceptable may well be a dichotomy to someone, and finding whether the threshold or cusp between them lies takes experiencing many degrees of less-than-ideal, especially if the decision is somehow influenced by factors o
    • adamselene
      I got my first real fountain pen on my 60th birthday and many hundreds of pens later I’ve often thought of what I should’ve known in the beginning. I have many pens, the majority of which have some objectionable feature. If they are too delicate, or can’t be posted, or they are too precious to face losing , still they are users, but only in very limited environments..  I have a big disliking for pens that have the cap jump into the air and fly off. I object to Pens that dry out, or leave blobs o
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...