Jump to content

1957 Parker Duofold Maxima


eugenebeauxbuton

Recommended Posts

As is my habit, I pulled the trigger on this pen and then began the deep research into its provenance and Duofold Maximas on the whole.

 

A couple of questions:

 

1. The Maxima is said to have been released in 1958 to replace the Senior, correct? I have a nib imprinted with 1957. What gives??

 

2. I was reading that the barrel is imprinted with something along the lines of "Parker Duofold Maxima/Made in England" and yet mine does not have that (the only thing is a rather cool reference to the 26th Colchester Sea Scouts which seem to be the UK's seafaring boy scouts -- fine with being wrong here).

 

Thoughts on the above or why this might be the case? Is my 1957 in fact a Frankenstein's monster of a pen? See attached for pics. Thanks for the help and consideration!

 

 

post-1727-0-93373900-1496422778.png

post-1727-0-58432100-1496422785.png

post-1727-0-80975800-1496422794.png

Current Collection:

 

1922 BCHR Waterman No. 52

1941 Parker Vacumatic Major (Canada)

1946 Parker Vacumatic Major (U.S.)

1957/8 Parker Duofold Maxima (U.K.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • eugenebeauxbuton

    2

  • Beechwood

    2

  • mitto

    1

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Firstly, that is an exceptional pen, looks perfect.

 

The maxima was introduced in 1958 at 50 shillings, twice as a much as a Slimfold. 50 shillings is £2 50p, average weekly wage at the time was £12.

 

From memory, the Maxima didnt replace the Senior, I bought a senior in 1964 for example. The Maxima was quite a bit longer than the senior, also the nib was both bigger and better.

 

It wouldnt be unreasonable for the nib to be made in 1957 ready for a 58 launch (probably a Christmas 57 launch in reality).

 

You are not far wrong in your summation of a Sea Scout, whereas the regular Scout would go to the woods the Sea Scout would sail away in a pea green boat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I picked up my red aero Maxima Duofold I asked the seller what does the imprint on the barrel says. He replied there was no imprint on the barrel. Yet I bought the pen seeing the #50 nib and the size of the pen in the pictures. When the pen arrived I was able to see the worn out imprint using a powerful loupe.

 

Might be the imprint is there on your pen too but is worn out.

Khan M. Ilyas

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes I feel rather happy to have found such a lovely example.

 

 

Ah thanks much @Beechwood, thought that might be a possibility with manufacturing dates...

 

Will need to scope it out then @mitto.

Current Collection:

 

1922 BCHR Waterman No. 52

1941 Parker Vacumatic Major (Canada)

1946 Parker Vacumatic Major (U.S.)

1957/8 Parker Duofold Maxima (U.K.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes I feel rather happy to have found such a lovely example.

 

 

Ah thanks much @Beechwood, thought that might be a possibility with manufacturing dates...

 

Will need to scope it out then @mitto.

 

 

It is not imperative that Parker stamped the name and model on the pen, I have another Duofold that was made by Parker for a department store and stamped only with their name.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43844
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      33583
    3. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    4. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      26772
    5. jar
      jar
      26105
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • Shanghai Knife Dude
      I have the Sailor Naginata and some fancy blade nibs coming after 2022 by a number of new workshop from China.  With all my respect, IMHO, they are all (bleep) in doing chinese characters.  Go use a bush, or at least a bush pen. 
    • A Smug Dill
      It is the reason why I'm so keen on the idea of a personal library — of pens, nibs, inks, paper products, etc. — and spent so much money, as well as time and effort, to “build” it for myself (because I can't simply remember everything, especially as I'm getting older fast) and my wife, so that we can “know”; and, instead of just disposing of what displeased us, or even just not good enough to be “given the time of day” against competition from >500 other pens and >500 other inks for our at
    • adamselene
      Agreed.  And I think it’s good to be aware of this early on and think about at the point of buying rather than rationalizing a purchase..
    • A Smug Dill
      Alas, one cannot know “good” without some idea of “bad” against which to contrast; and, as one of my former bosses (back when I was in my twenties) used to say, “on the scale of good to bad…”, it's a spectrum, not a dichotomy. Whereas subjectively acceptable (or tolerable) and unacceptable may well be a dichotomy to someone, and finding whether the threshold or cusp between them lies takes experiencing many degrees of less-than-ideal, especially if the decision is somehow influenced by factors o
    • adamselene
      I got my first real fountain pen on my 60th birthday and many hundreds of pens later I’ve often thought of what I should’ve known in the beginning. I have many pens, the majority of which have some objectionable feature. If they are too delicate, or can’t be posted, or they are too precious to face losing , still they are users, but only in very limited environments..  I have a big disliking for pens that have the cap jump into the air and fly off. I object to Pens that dry out, or leave blobs o
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...